PSYC UN2640:

Discussion Prompt 1: “This [Smith’s previous point that satisfaction of the desire for worldly success is more substantial than pleasure] does not have to be argued for a contemporary Western audience. The Anglo-American temperament is not voluptuous. Visitors from abroad do not find English-speaking peoples enjoying life a great deal, or much bent on doing so – they are too busy. Being enamored not of sensualism but of success, what takes arguing in the West is not that achievement’s rewards exceed those of the senses but that success too has its limitations – that ‘What is he worth?’ does not come down to ‘How much has he got?’ (Smith, 15) Who are these ‘Anglo-Americans’ to which Smith refers? Do you agree with this characterization of Anglo-Americans as not “…enjoying life a great deal, or much bent on doing so – they are too busy. ”? Explain your view. Anglo-Americans refers to those people who speak English as their first language or their mother tongue. These people do not necessarily have to be whites but those people who move to the English speaking countries and begin to speak the English language and with time when they have offspring they learn English as their first or native language. The Anglo-Americans do not seem to be enjoying life but are viewed to focus much on their worldly success according to Smith. Also, these people are viewed to focus so much towards success rather than pleasure since they are mostly viewed be migrants who leave their native countries and settle in these countries with various reasons. These people also are believed to be living in those countries either due to job activities or as refugees who later end up having offspring’s who learn this language as they grow and become citizens of that state by birth because they were born in those countries. Discussion Prompt 2: “What is distinctive in Hinduism is the amount of attention it has devoted to identifying basic spiritual personality types and the disciplines that are most likely to work for each. The result is a recognition, pervading the entire religion, that there are multiple paths to God, each calling for its distinctive mode of travel.” (Smith, 28) What do we think about this claim, that there are multiple paths to God? A.The use of the singular (i.e. god v. gods) and capitalization, as with a proper name {i.e. (the) God v. (a) god} would seem to imply the same, identical, one and only one God…woul