MPH 6011 Final Exam | 100% Correct
Answers | Verified | Latest 2024 Version
True or false: A retrospective cohort study is an observational study but a prospective cohort study is an
intervention study. - ✔✔False
What study designs are both analytic, observational studies? - ✔✔Retrospective and prospective cohort
studies
What is the measure of association if we start with a cohort free of disease and analysis is by cumulative
incidence? - ✔✔relative risk
What is the ratio of cumulative incidence rate in exposed compared to cumulative incidence rate in the
unexposed? - ✔✔relative risk
What is the measure of association if we start with a cohort free of disease and analysis is by incidence
rates with person-time in the denominator? - ✔✔rate ratio
In a cohort study, several design and implementation problems can impact the strength of the measure
of association. Choose which of these problems below is least likely in a cohort study?
a. information bias
b. absence of temporality
c. loss to follow-up
d. none of the above - ✔✔b
Among the items listed below, which design feature or bias is NOT similarly found in both case-control
and cohort studies?
a. both make comparisons between exposed and unexposed groups
b. confounding
c. both measure exposure before disease occurs
, d. both can have misclassification of exposure - ✔✔c
Exposure is measured __________ disease occurrence in cohort studies.
a. before
b. after - ✔✔a
In a cohort study, the association between smoking and coronary heart disease was investigated by
selecting for study a group of 3000 smokers and 5000 non-smokers who were free of disease at baseline.
Both groups were followed for the development of coronary heart disease. 84 smokers developed
coronary heart disease and 87 non smokers did too. 4913 persons did not develop disease and did not
smoke. The measure of association relating exposed to unexposed would be: - ✔✔(84/3000)/(87/5000)
True or false: Attributable risk tells us how much disease can be prevented if exposure is removed from
the population. - ✔✔True
In a 20 year cohort study with 30 cases of heart disease in exposed group and 54,308 person years, while
the unexposed group had 60 cases and 51,477 person-years. The measure of association showed 0.47.
The best interpretation of this finding was:
a. exposed group had a greater risk of heart disease than unexposed group
b. unexposed group had reduced risk of heart disease compared to exposed group
c. exposed group had a reduced risk of heart disease compared to the unexposed group - ✔✔c
Which of the following is an advantage of cohort studies?
a. can examine multiple outcomes from a single exposure
b. can match on confounders
c. can avoid recall bias
d. can enroll cases at beginning of study - ✔✔a
True or false: A case control study can be embedded within a cohort? - ✔✔True
Answers | Verified | Latest 2024 Version
True or false: A retrospective cohort study is an observational study but a prospective cohort study is an
intervention study. - ✔✔False
What study designs are both analytic, observational studies? - ✔✔Retrospective and prospective cohort
studies
What is the measure of association if we start with a cohort free of disease and analysis is by cumulative
incidence? - ✔✔relative risk
What is the ratio of cumulative incidence rate in exposed compared to cumulative incidence rate in the
unexposed? - ✔✔relative risk
What is the measure of association if we start with a cohort free of disease and analysis is by incidence
rates with person-time in the denominator? - ✔✔rate ratio
In a cohort study, several design and implementation problems can impact the strength of the measure
of association. Choose which of these problems below is least likely in a cohort study?
a. information bias
b. absence of temporality
c. loss to follow-up
d. none of the above - ✔✔b
Among the items listed below, which design feature or bias is NOT similarly found in both case-control
and cohort studies?
a. both make comparisons between exposed and unexposed groups
b. confounding
c. both measure exposure before disease occurs
, d. both can have misclassification of exposure - ✔✔c
Exposure is measured __________ disease occurrence in cohort studies.
a. before
b. after - ✔✔a
In a cohort study, the association between smoking and coronary heart disease was investigated by
selecting for study a group of 3000 smokers and 5000 non-smokers who were free of disease at baseline.
Both groups were followed for the development of coronary heart disease. 84 smokers developed
coronary heart disease and 87 non smokers did too. 4913 persons did not develop disease and did not
smoke. The measure of association relating exposed to unexposed would be: - ✔✔(84/3000)/(87/5000)
True or false: Attributable risk tells us how much disease can be prevented if exposure is removed from
the population. - ✔✔True
In a 20 year cohort study with 30 cases of heart disease in exposed group and 54,308 person years, while
the unexposed group had 60 cases and 51,477 person-years. The measure of association showed 0.47.
The best interpretation of this finding was:
a. exposed group had a greater risk of heart disease than unexposed group
b. unexposed group had reduced risk of heart disease compared to exposed group
c. exposed group had a reduced risk of heart disease compared to the unexposed group - ✔✔c
Which of the following is an advantage of cohort studies?
a. can examine multiple outcomes from a single exposure
b. can match on confounders
c. can avoid recall bias
d. can enroll cases at beginning of study - ✔✔a
True or false: A case control study can be embedded within a cohort? - ✔✔True
