LICEO DE CAGAYAN UNIVERSITY
Section 1: Theoretical Concepts and Frameworks
1. Question: Compare and contrast the contributions of the Ecological Systems Theory and the
Strengths Perspective in social work practice. How do these frameworks influence intervention
strategies?
Answer:
The Ecological Systems Theory, developed by Urie Bronfenbrenner, emphasizes the interaction
between individuals and their environments, focusing on multiple layers of influence from
immediate contexts (microsystems) to broader societal factors (macrosystems). This theory
informs intervention by addressing how various environmental systems impact an individual’s
behavior and well-being, prompting social workers to engage with the client’s entire ecosystem
for effective interventions.
In contrast, the Strengths Perspective, rooted in the work of Saleebey, focuses on the inherent
strengths and resources of individuals, families, and communities. It encourages social workers
to identify and leverage these strengths to empower clients and foster resilience. While the
Ecological Systems Theory directs attention to the interplay of environmental factors, the
Strengths Perspective shifts the focus to the capabilities and potential of clients themselves.
Interventions based on this perspective are centered on building upon existing strengths rather
than solely addressing deficits.
2. Question: Discuss how the use of Critical Race Theory (CRT) can influence social work
practice, particularly in relation to policy development and client advocacy.
Answer:
Critical Race Theory (CRT) provides a framework for analyzing how race and racism intersect
with other forms of social stratification and power structures. In social work practice, CRT can
influence policy development by highlighting the ways in which institutional racism and
systemic inequalities affect marginalized communities. It encourages social workers to advocate
for policies that address racial injustices and promote equity.
By incorporating CRT, social workers can critically evaluate existing policies and practices for
potential biases and advocate for reforms that promote social justice. For client advocacy, CRT
helps in understanding the unique experiences of clients from racially marginalized backgrounds
and supports approaches that acknowledge and challenge racial inequities.
Section 2: Complex Case Scenarios