The Court of Criminal Appeal
ADRIAN TWOMEY
Appellant
-and-
THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS
Respondent
21$33($/)5207+(&(175$/&5,0,1$/&2857
0(025,$/2)7+($33(//$17
Page 1 of 19
,TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Introduction
2. Validity of the Warrant
3. Constitutionality of the Warrant
4. Technical Issues Arising with the Warrant
5. Conclusion
Page 2 of 19
, 1. Introduction
1. It is submitted that the warrant in the case should be deemed invalid on the
following grounds:
a. Invalidity of the Warrant
b. Unconstitutionality of the Warrant
c. Technical Issues Arising in the Warrant
Page 3 of 19
ADRIAN TWOMEY
Appellant
-and-
THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS
Respondent
21$33($/)5207+(&(175$/&5,0,1$/&2857
0(025,$/2)7+($33(//$17
Page 1 of 19
,TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Introduction
2. Validity of the Warrant
3. Constitutionality of the Warrant
4. Technical Issues Arising with the Warrant
5. Conclusion
Page 2 of 19
, 1. Introduction
1. It is submitted that the warrant in the case should be deemed invalid on the
following grounds:
a. Invalidity of the Warrant
b. Unconstitutionality of the Warrant
c. Technical Issues Arising in the Warrant
Page 3 of 19
