Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

Evaluating a Science Diversity Program at UC Berkeley: More Questions Than Answers

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
5
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
10-08-2024
Geschreven in
2024/2025

lower high school GPAs and total SAT scores upon entering UC Berkeley (Table 2), they graduate with a biology degree in significantly higher percentages than non-BSP members regardless of race/ethnicity (Figure 1). For all racial/ethnic groups combined (All Groups), there is no statistical difference in final UC GPA (Figure 2). 2. For Majority Graduates—BSP Majority students enter UC Berkeley with significantly lower total SAT scores (Table 2) yet graduate with a higher percentage of biology degrees and a UC GPA equivalent to that of non-BSP majority students (Figures 1 and 2). BSP Majority students have similar high school GPAs compared to non-BSP Majority students. 3. For Minority Graduates—Minority BSP students enter UC Berkeley with equivalent high school SAT scores and GPAs Table 3. Summary of results: comparison of BSP vs. non-BSP students in terms of preparation (SAT and high school GPA) and success (completion of a biology degree and final UC GPA) at UC Berkeley between 1994 and 1999a Race/ethnicity High school GPA Total SAT score Completion of biology degree Final UC GPA All Groups ↓↓ ↑ — Majority — ↓ ↑ — Minority — — ↑ ↑ African American — — ↑ ↑ Hispanic — — ↑ ↑ a–No significant differences. (↑↓) Statistically significant differences using Scheff´e’s (1953) F post hoc test; significance is noted where P 0.05. and graduate with a higher percentage of biology degrees and a higher UC GPA than nonmembers (Figures 1 and 2). 4. For African-American Graduates—BSP and non-BSP African-American students enter UC Berkeley with similar high school GPAs and SAT scores (Table 2), yet BSP members graduate with a higher percentage of biology degrees and a higher UC GPA than students not in the program (Figures 1 and 2). 5. For Hispanic Graduates—BSP and non-BSP Hispanic students enter UC Berkeley with similar high school GPAs and SAT scores (Table 2), yet BSP members graduate with a higher percentage of biology degrees and a higher UC GPA than students not in BSP (Figures 1 and 2). DISCUSSION Our analysis of student performance suggests that underrepresented students in BSP have attained parity with nonprogram majority students in terms of graduating with a biology degree and in terms of their GPA at graduation. In fact, BSP Minority students graduate with statistically similar final UC GPAs compared to non-BSP Majority students (data not shown). In other words, by their success in biology at UC Berkeley, BSP graduates have closed the minority–majority gap. This raises the important questions of (1) What possible role has BSP had in their success? and (2) What can other institutions do to help their undergraduates replicate this success? What kinds of activities characterize BSP? Many are familiar to those with program goals similar to those of BSP, including study groups, paid research opportunities, and mentoring by culturally sensitive faculty and advisors who teach students “how to think about” their major and career choices and provide “reality checks” regarding their readiness to succeed in specific courses, research, and summer internships. In addition, the BSP Center is housed within the academic biology community, and the students immediately are part of that physical identification with biology. Finally, a student advisory committee has been integral in voicing the needs and concerns of BSP members, planning activities each semester that reflect their interests and needs. However, no listing or description of components can explain the effectiveness of BSP. “Building community,” “mentoring,” “addressing critical transitions,” and “providing research opportunities and academic support” are common phrases used to describe what programs like BSP do to address underrepresentation in science (e.g., see the inventory of common characteristics of successful science diversity programs in Gandara and Maxwell-Jolly [1999]). If it is as simple 120 Cell Biology Education Evaluating a Science Diversity Program at UC Berkeley as providing students with this fairly agreed-upon list of conditions for their success, then why, after three decades of effort across the United States, is there still underrepresentation in science at the undergraduate, graduate, and professional levels? It is within this context that we raise a number of questions about the overall success of BSP for further study. 1. Are BSP students simply more motivated than Berkeley students at large, and, if so, might this difference account for the results in Figures 1 and 2? 2. In Figure 2, what is the “real-world” significance of these statistically significant differences in final UC GPA? At UC Berkeley, undergraduates know their GPAs to the 1000th decimal point: Might a 3.160 vs. a 2.949 GPA make a real difference in students’ self-concept and their ability to succeed in science? 3. Many BSP members participate in research while at Berkeley. Is there a correlation among research, graduation rates, and final GPA for BSP members and/or nonmembers? 4. Is gender a significant factor in the success of BSP vs. non-BSP students? The majority of participants in BSP are women, over 65%. Based on our current measures of preparation and success, statistical analyses show no significant differences between men and women within and outside the program. From nearly a decade of working successfully with BSP members, it is our strong sense that our single greatest challenge is to go beyond simply describing what we have done to explaining why it has worked, in applicable ways/formats that we can share with our colleagues. Toward elevating BSP to “the next level” as we go into the 11th year of the program, we view this study as a formative step toward understanding BSP in terms of what is working, what is not, and f

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Evaluating A Science Diversity Program At UC Berke
Vak
Evaluating a Science Diversity Program at UC Berke

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Cell Biology Education
Vol. 2, 117–121, Summer 2003




Articles
Evaluating a Science Diversity Program at UC Berkeley:
More Questions Than Answers
John Matsui,* Roger Liu, and Caroline M. Kane
Biology Scholars Program, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, 2075 Valley Life Sciences
Building, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720-3200

Submitted October 8, 2002; Revised December 10, 2002; Accepted January 8, 2003
Monitoring Editor: Anton Lawson



For the past three decades, much attention has been focused on developing diversity programs
designed to improve the academic success of underrepresented minorities, primarily in mathe-
matics, science, and engineering. However, ethnic minorities remain underrepresented in science
majors and careers. Over the last 10 years, the Biology Scholars Program (BSP), a diversity pro-
gram at the University of California (UC), Berkeley, has worked to increase the participation and
success of students majoring in the biological sciences. A quantitative comparison of students in
and out of the program indicates that students in BSP graduate with a degree in biology at signif-
icantly higher rates than students not in BSP regardless of race/ethnicity. Furthermore, students
who are in BSP have statistically lower high school grade point averages (GPAs) and Scholastic
Achievement Test (SAT) scores than students not in BSP. African-American and Hispanic stu-
dents who join BSP graduate with significantly higher UC Berkeley biology GPAs than non-BSP
African-American and Hispanic students, respectively. Majority (Asian and White) students in
BSP graduate with statistically similar UC GPAs despite having lower SAT scores than non-BSP
majority students. Although BSP students are more successful in completing a biology degree
than non-program members, the results raise a series of questions about why the program works
and for whom.
Keywords: science diversity program, University of California, Berkeley, Biology Scholars Program, minority
students, grade point average, Scholastic Achievement Test.


INTRODUCTION degrees awarded in the fields of math, science, and engineer-
ing. For example, of the 65,000 bachelors degrees awarded na-
The population of the United States is undergoing dramatic
tionally in the biological sciences in 1999, underrepresented
demographical changes. In 2000, the U.S. population num-
minorities received less than 13%. Although the numbers
bered over 280 million people, increasing 38% from 1990,
of academically successful underrepresented minorities have
with dramatic increases in the numbers of racial/ethnic mi-
grown over the past four decades, there still exists a signifi-
norities. In 1999, the U.S. Department of Education reported
cant graduation gap between majority and minority students,
that approximately 44% of the population between 18 and
especially in the sciences.
24 years of age was enrolled in a 4-year degree-granting in-
For more than 30 years, much attention has been focused on
stitution. Although underrepresented minorities, including
developing programs designed to improve academic success
African Americans, Hispanics, and Native Americans, con-
for underrepresented minorities. A large percentage of these
stitute 25% of the U.S. population, they received a dispro-
programs has been designed for college students entering the
portionately low percentage (16%) of all bachelors degrees
fields of math, science, and engineering. In 1999, a report com-
awarded. The percentage decreases further when examining
missioned by the College Board, a not-for-profit educational
association, described and assessed 24 college and univer-
DOI: 10.1187/cbe.02-10-0050 sity programs involved in promoting the high achievement of
*Corresponding author. E-mail address: . underrepresented minority students (Gandara and Maxwell-
edu. Jolly, 1999). Although the study describes “what works,” few



C 2003 by The American Society for Cell Biology 117

, J. Matsui et al.

quantitative data are provided as to the effectiveness of the The specific aims of this article are (1) to present the results
programs in increasing graduates. In addition, a separate of a quantitative evaluation of the success of BSP students,
study commissioned by the College Board in the same year (2) to discuss programmatic research questions raised by
reported that only a few promising programs were found to these results, and (3) to develop an outline for future studies.
have undergone extensive external evaluation (Cota-Robles
and Gordan, 1999). METHODS
The University of California (UC), Berkeley, is well known
for both its academic programs and its diverse student pop- To assess the impact of BSP on its members to date, we compared
program and nonprogram members in terms of the following.
ulation. However, between 1992 and 1999, of the students
majoring in the biological sciences, only 4% were African I. Academic preparation—as measured by their uncapped high-school
American and 9% were Hispanic. In 1992, The Biology Schol- GPA and their combined score for the math and verbal SAT tests.
ars Program (BSP) was established in the Department of II. Success—as measured by
Molecular and Cell Biology at UC Berkeley. Funded by the (a) The percentage of intended biology majors who graduated
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, BSP is a program de- with a biology degree.
signed to promote the success of undergraduates from eco- (b) Comparisons of final UC GPA.
nomic, gender, ethnic, and cultural groups historically under- Data on biology graduates were taken from the Central Campus Stu-
represented in the biological sciences. BSP is an academically dent Database.
centered program administratively housed in UC Berkeley’s
Department of Molecular and Cell Biology. It is a continuum Research Participants
of resources available to help its members address critical
The data used for this analysis span the academic years 1992 through
transitions (e.g., making the high school-to-university aca- 1999, and using these data, we compare BSP and non-BSP students
demic and social adjustment, declaring a major, applying to graduating with a degree in the biological sciences between 1994 and
graduate or professional school) throughout their undergrad- 1999. Spring of 1994 saw the first BSP graduates. Our comparison
uate years. Program components include academic support data sets include all 1994–1999 BSP (n = 143) and non-BSP (n = 1904)
for lower-division courses in the biology major, an academic biology graduates (Table 1). In our study, “intended biology majors”
and career seminar series, social events, access to on- and off- include those students who state on their admissions application that
campus paid research opportunities, academic and personal they intend to major in 1 of 11 majors: bioengineering, conservation
and resource studies, environmental science, forestry, genetics and
advising, and mentoring. By design, BSP also addresses issues
plant biology, integrative biology, microbial biology, molecular and
that encompass students’ lives “beyond academics,” such as cell biology, molecular environmental biology, nutritional sciences,
the impact of family, financial, personal, etc., issues on their and resource management. It should be noted that intended majors
performance at Berkeley. Overall, the goal of BSP is to create in biology who do not graduate with a biology degree have not nec-
a community of scholars with both high academic expecta- essarily left the university but may have switched to an alternative
tions and high academic support, which allows its members major.
to network with culturally sensitive faculty, staff, more se- In addition to Intended Major, the data sets of 1994–1999 BSP and
non-BSP graduates also include Ethnicity, Math–Verbal–Total SAT
nior undergraduates, and graduate students in an academic
Scores, Uncapped High School GPA (i.e., GPAs that exceed a max-
context. imum of 4.0 if a student takes honors and/or advanced placement
Any student admitted to the UC Berkeley undergrad- courses), and Final UC GPA at graduation.
uate program expressing an interest in the biological sci- All students in the study are “intended biology majors,” “All
ences is qualified to join BSP. Underrepresented high school Groups” includes “Majority” + “Minority” students, “Majority” in-
students applying to UC Berkeley with an interest in the cludes Asian and White students, and “Minority” includes African-
biological sciences, as indicated on their application, are American and Hispanic (Chicano/Latino) students. Native American
mailed information including an invitation to apply to the and Pacific Island students were not included in this analysis because
of their small numbers.
program. UC Berkeley students from low-income and/or Regarding graduates who were once transfer students, because
first-generation college backgrounds are identified through most of them completed their lower-division science and math-
various on-campus programs, provided an informational ematics courses at their community colleges before their admis-
meeting, and encouraged to apply. Current students having sion to the university, we cannot assume that their academic
difficulties adjusting to the university are referred to BSP by experiences (e.g., lower-division class size, testing, workload) were
professors and college/major advisors. Finally, current BSP similar to those of students who entered Berkeley as freshmen.
members can recommend students for acceptance into the Therefore, in this study students who transferred to the university
in advanced standing were omitted from the analyses. In a future
program. Selection into the program is based on an infor-
mational one-on-one meeting with either the Director or the
Assistant Director of BSP that includes a written application
and a final interview. Table 1. Race/ethnicity of BSP and non-BSP students graduating
Between 1992 and 1999, African American and Hispanic with a biology degree at UC Berkeley between 1994 and 1999
students made up 28 and 31% of the program participants, re-
spectively. The goal of BSP is to diversify those participating Race/ethnic category BSP Non-BSP
in science by targeting Berkeley undergraduates from these
underrepresented groups. Through collaborative academic African American 31 (22%) 31 (2%)
workshops, research opportunities, career/course advising, Asian 61 (43%) 1283 (67%)
and a student center located in the heart of the main science Hispanic 39 (27%) 111 (6%)
Caucasian 12 (8%) 479 (25%)
building on the UC Berkeley campus, students develop a com- Total 143 (100%) 1904 (100%)
munity through academic as well as social activities.


118 Cell Biology Education

Geschreven voor

Instelling
Evaluating a Science Diversity Program at UC Berke
Vak
Evaluating a Science Diversity Program at UC Berke

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
10 augustus 2024
Aantal pagina's
5
Geschreven in
2024/2025
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

$13.49
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
StudyCenter1 Teachme2-tutor
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
227
Lid sinds
2 jaar
Aantal volgers
91
Documenten
3850
Laatst verkocht
3 dagen geleden
Nursing school is hard! Im here to simply the information and make it easier!

My mission is to be your LIGHT in the dark. If you"re worried or having trouble in nursing school, I really want my notes to be your guide! I know they have helped countless others get through and thats all i want for YOU! Stay with me and you will find everything you need to study and pass any tests,quizzes abd exams!

4.3

28 beoordelingen

5
18
4
4
3
4
2
0
1
2

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen