Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

Progression of recurrent acute to chronic pancreatitis: More questions than answers!

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
2
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
10-08-2024
Geschreven in
2024/2025

Progression of recurrent acute to chronic pancreatitis: More questions than answers! Rupjyoti Talukdar1 Published online: 19 March 2018 # Indian Society of Gastroenterology 2018 Acute pancreatitis (AP) continues to pose a substantial challenge to clinicians and researchers. It has been proposed that an index episode of AP could progress to recurrent AP (RAP) and may finally culminate into chronic pancreatitis (CP). This is the sentinel acute pancreatitis event (SAPE) hypothesis that defines pancreatitis as a disease spectrum [1]. Even though several clinical and bench studies have provided insights into the pathophysiology of the disease [2–5], there is still no modality to accurately predict the progression of RAP to CP. This gap in understanding has likely, at least in part, precluded development of any specific interventions that could prevent progression of RAP to CP or reverse the changes of CP. In the current issue, Kalaria and colleagues have reported their observations on the progression of RAP to CP in a tertiary care private hospital in western India [6]. They observed the development of features of CP during a median period of 32 months in five out of 72 patients who had a single episode of AP. 27.8% had RAP of which 13 (48.1%) developed features of chronicity after a median of 47 months from the index or sentinel episode. Chronicity was observed with a higher frequency among patients with alcoholic and idiopathic subtypes. In a meta-analysis by Sankaran et al. in 2015 [7], the crude prevalence of RAP based on 11 studies (n = 8017) was estimated to be 22% (95% CI 18% to 26%). However, on analysis of the prospective studies only (nine studies, n = 1869), the pooled prevalence of RAP turned out to be 20% (95% CI 15% to 25%). Five studies (n = 6826) in this metaanalysis reported the subsequent diagnosis of CP after RAP, which was reported to be 36% (95% CI 20% to 53%). On the other hand, 10% of patients who had a single episode of AP subsequently developed CP. Unpublished data from an ongoing study from our institute also reveals that 10% of patients with a single episode of AP and 28% with RAP eventually developed CP. Since only a proportion of RAP progresses to CP, it becomes speculative as to what determines the progression of RAP to CP. A recent study from the Dutch group involving 669 patients who survived the first episode of AP defined independent risk factors for the development of CP after an index and recurrent AP [8]. RAP conferred an odds of 2.90 (95% CI 2.07 to 4.05) per episode for progression to CP. Among patients who had RAP as a risk factor, the other independent risk factors for progression to CP were alcohol as the etiology (OR 4.85 [95% CI 2.04 to 11.52]) and development of necrotizing pancreatitis (OR 8.78 [95% CI 4.09 to 18.86]). On the other hand, among patients who did not have RAP, the independent risk factors were alcohol (OR 4.22 [95% CI 1.83 to 9.73]; p = 0.001) and idiopathic etiology (OR 3.98 [95% CI 1.64 to 9.65]; p = 0.002), current smoker (OR 2.90 [95% CI 1.42 to 5.93]; p = 0.004), and necrotizing pancreatitis (OR 6.65 [95% CI 3.40 to 13.01]; p 0.001). It is now clearly established that the pathological hallmark of CP is progressive fibrosis that is mediated by the activated pancreatic stellate cells (PSCs). PSC activation could be triggered by several mediators including alcohol, smoking, and inflammatory cytokines such as interleukins, TGF-β, TNF-α, and PDGF, to name a few [9]. It was also shown in an experimental setting that application of pressure on PSCs could result in the generation of oxidative stress, which is known to result in inflammation [10]. This observation could have an implication in patients with CP, in whom ductal and interstitial hypertension due to pancreatic ductal obstruction could result in PSC activation. Interestingly, it has been shown in experimental models of AP using L-arginine that there could be PSC activation and early fibrosis even after the first episode of AP [11]. In our recent studies using human pancreatic acini, we could show that PSC activation could occur even after bile acid-mediated injury [4]. However, clinical acute biliary pancreatitis does not progress to CP. This implies that for * Rupjyoti Talukdar 1 Pancreas Research Group, Asian Healthcare Foundation/Wellcome DBT Labs, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, 6-3-661 Somajiguda, Hyderabad 500 082, India Indian Journal of Gastroenterology (March–April 2018) 37(2):77–78 progressive fibrosis to occur, PSC activation needs to be repetitive and persistent and should reach a certain thres

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Progression Of Recurrent Acute To Chronic Pancreat
Vak
Progression of recurrent acute to chronic pancreat

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Indian Journal of Gastroenterology (March–April 2018) 37(2):77–78
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-018-0839-8

EDITORIAL



Progression of recurrent acute to chronic pancreatitis: More questions
than answers!
Rupjyoti Talukdar 1

Published online: 19 March 2018
# Indian Society of Gastroenterology 2018




Acute pancreatitis (AP) continues to pose a substantial chal- ongoing study from our institute also reveals that 10% of
lenge to clinicians and researchers. It has been proposed that patients with a single episode of AP and 28% with RAP even-
an index episode of AP could progress to recurrent AP (RAP) tually developed CP.
and may finally culminate into chronic pancreatitis (CP). This Since only a proportion of RAP progresses to CP, it be-
is the sentinel acute pancreatitis event (SAPE) hypothesis that comes speculative as to what determines the progression of
defines pancreatitis as a disease spectrum [1]. Even though RAP to CP. A recent study from the Dutch group involving
several clinical and bench studies have provided insights into 669 patients who survived the first episode of AP defined
the pathophysiology of the disease [2–5], there is still no mo- independent risk factors for the development of CP after an
dality to accurately predict the progression of RAP to CP. This index and recurrent AP [8]. RAP conferred an odds of 2.90
gap in understanding has likely, at least in part, precluded (95% CI 2.07 to 4.05) per episode for progression to CP.
development of any specific interventions that could prevent Among patients who had RAP as a risk factor, the other inde-
progression of RAP to CP or reverse the changes of CP. pendent risk factors for progression to CP were alcohol as the
In the current issue, Kalaria and colleagues have reported etiology (OR 4.85 [95% CI 2.04 to 11.52]) and development
their observations on the progression of RAP to CP in a ter- of necrotizing pancreatitis (OR 8.78 [95% CI 4.09 to 18.86]).
tiary care private hospital in western India [6]. They observed On the other hand, among patients who did not have RAP, the
the development of features of CP during a median period of independent risk factors were alcohol (OR 4.22 [95% CI 1.83
32 months in five out of 72 patients who had a single episode to 9.73]; p = 0.001) and idiopathic etiology (OR 3.98 [95% CI
of AP. 27.8% had RAP of which 13 (48.1%) developed fea- 1.64 to 9.65]; p = 0.002), current smoker (OR 2.90 [95% CI
tures of chronicity after a median of 47 months from the index 1.42 to 5.93]; p = 0.004), and necrotizing pancreatitis (OR
or sentinel episode. Chronicity was observed with a higher 6.65 [95% CI 3.40 to 13.01]; p < 0.001).
frequency among patients with alcoholic and idiopathic sub- It is now clearly established that the pathological hallmark
types. In a meta-analysis by Sankaran et al. in 2015 [7], the of CP is progressive fibrosis that is mediated by the activated
crude prevalence of RAP based on 11 studies (n = 8017) was pancreatic stellate cells (PSCs). PSC activation could be trig-
estimated to be 22% (95% CI 18% to 26%). However, on gered by several mediators including alcohol, smoking, and
analysis of the prospective studies only (nine studies, n = inflammatory cytokines such as interleukins, TGF-β, TNF-α,
1869), the pooled prevalence of RAP turned out to be 20% and PDGF, to name a few [9]. It was also shown in an exper-
(95% CI 15% to 25%). Five studies (n = 6826) in this meta- imental setting that application of pressure on PSCs could
analysis reported the subsequent diagnosis of CP after RAP, result in the generation of oxidative stress, which is known
which was reported to be 36% (95% CI 20% to 53%). On the to result in inflammation [10]. This observation could have an
other hand, 10% of patients who had a single episode of AP implication in patients with CP, in whom ductal and interstitial
subsequently developed CP. Unpublished data from an hypertension due to pancreatic ductal obstruction could result
in PSC activation. Interestingly, it has been shown in experi-
mental models of AP using L-arginine that there could be PSC
* Rupjyoti Talukdar activation and early fibrosis even after the first episode of AP
[11]. In our recent studies using human pancreatic acini, we
1 could show that PSC activation could occur even after bile
Pancreas Research Group, Asian Healthcare Foundation/Wellcome
DBT Labs, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, 6-3-661 Somajiguda, acid-mediated injury [4]. However, clinical acute biliary
Hyderabad 500 082, India pancreatitis does not progress to CP. This implies that for

Geschreven voor

Instelling
Progression of recurrent acute to chronic pancreat
Vak
Progression of recurrent acute to chronic pancreat

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
10 augustus 2024
Aantal pagina's
2
Geschreven in
2024/2025
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

$12.99
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
StudyCenter1 Teachme2-tutor
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
227
Lid sinds
2 jaar
Aantal volgers
91
Documenten
3850
Laatst verkocht
2 weken geleden
Nursing school is hard! Im here to simply the information and make it easier!

My mission is to be your LIGHT in the dark. If you"re worried or having trouble in nursing school, I really want my notes to be your guide! I know they have helped countless others get through and thats all i want for YOU! Stay with me and you will find everything you need to study and pass any tests,quizzes abd exams!

4.3

28 beoordelingen

5
18
4
4
3
4
2
0
1
2

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen