Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

DBIA EXAM 3

Rating
5.0
(1)
Sold
-
Pages
10
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
25-09-2024
Written in
2024/2025

Exam study book Design-Build: Planning Through Development of Jeffrey L. Beard, Michael C. Loulakis, Edward C. Wundram - ISBN: 9780071499965 (DBIA EXAM 3)

Institution
Course

Content preview

DBIA EXAM 3 LATEST ACTUAL EXAM
How team members are organized, establishes when parties engage, determines
roles of parties, and determines sequence of design, procurement, and construction
(db, cmar, dbb) - ANSWER: Project Delivery System

how team members are selected (QBS, best value, low price, sole source) - ANSWER:
Procurement Method

how team members are paid (fp, gmp, cost reimbursement, target price, unit price) -
ANSWER: contracting approach

linear, sequential process, A/E selected on qualifications, GC selected on low price,
design is fully completed without input from GC, A/E acting in owner's interests, with
a historically strong bond, process is well-established and understood - ANSWER:
Design-Bid-Build (DBB)

similar org structure to DBB, construction manager selected by QBS or best value,
contractor provides precon services, negotiated gmp contracting approach, open
book estimating process, potential to fast track project, construction cost
determined before design completed, potential issues over what is reasonably
inferable from gmp design documents - ANSWER: construction manager at risk

The owner contracts with one entity (a person or firm) to provide both design and
construction services, designer and contractor have a direct contractual relationship,
selected by QBS or best value, wide spectrum of contracting approaches and
organizational structures, single point responsibility, owner does not manage
designer, owner exposure to claims is significantly reduced - ANSWER: Design-Build

similar to design build, in industrial and power generation sectors, systems and
performance testing are central to scope, contractor will typically perform
engineering with its in-house staff, owner has need for single point responsibility,
contracts include plant and process performance guarantees, contract items include
performance and schedule liquidated damages and limitations of liability - ANSWER:
engineer procure construct (epc)

owner contracts with multiple trade contractors, attributes are typically similar to
dbb, owner's ability to schedule and coordinate the work - ANSWER: Multiple Prime
Contracting

multi-party agreement - all parties equal, QBS procurement and target pricing
contract approach, private sector use (limited at this time), key: owner's ability to
accept risk - ANSWER: Integrated Project Delivery (IPD)

Instead of government building and maintaining major infrastructure (such as
highway, water treatment plant), build and maintenance is outsourced to a private

, company. Opposed by public sector unions. this is not considered a delivery system
but its underlying approaches are delivery systems and typically use DB. multiple
procurement and contracting approaches - ANSWER: public-private partnership (p3)

intense efforts to establish scope early in the process; drives early team formation to
include key trade subcontractors; can enable big decisions to be made early, affect
project outcomes at lowest cost, establish a need for co-location and collaboration,
and compress time during concurrent design and construction - ANSWER: shift left

typically two-phase best value procurement with lump sum contract; owner defines
project requirements and scope of prescriptive work; use of performance-based
technical requirements with limited prescriptive specifications - ANSWER: traditional
design build

design and price are progressively developed after the design-builder is under
contract; final project cost and schedule commitment is not established as part of
the selection process; two phases: preliminary services and final design and
construction services - ANSWER: progressive design build

describe the end result - ANSWER: criteria documents

prescribes how to achieve the end result - ANSWER: bridging documents

prior to bidding, owner undertakes a process to design the project and all of its
details to 100% complete plans and specs. the owner is therefore responsible for
success or failure of details of the design, and warrants the sufficiency of design to
the contractor. the owner is therefore liable to the contractor for any gaps between
plans and specifications and owner's requirements for project performance -
ANSWER: design bid build paradigm

the owner should define its performance requirements and award the contract on
the basis of preliminary design; this makes the design-builder responsible for
completing the design in accordance with the owner's performance requirements.
that also causes the design-builder to warrant the sufficiency of the design to meet
the owner's criteria and the sufficiency of the design to subcontractors/suppliers
that have no design responsibility - ANSWER: design details responsibility

subdivides project by functional elements, focuses on systems and assemblies, useful
for preliminary information and early design phases, aligns with BIM models and
conceptual estimating - ANSWER: uniformat

subdivides work by results/trades, focuses on building materials, products, and
activities, useful for detailed information during final design and construction
phases, and aligns with detailed estimating - ANSWER: masterformat

a specific business need or behavior as seen by an external user of the system;
describe what functions/operations the end product must perform/accommodate;

Connected book

Written for

Course

Document information

Uploaded on
September 25, 2024
Number of pages
10
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

$18.49
Get access to the full document:

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF


Also available in package deal

Reviews from verified buyers

Showing all reviews
5 months ago

5.0

1 reviews

5
1
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0
Trustworthy reviews on Stuvia

All reviews are made by real Stuvia users after verified purchases.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
tutorsection1 Chamberlain College Of Nursing
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
52
Member since
1 year
Number of followers
8
Documents
1077
Last sold
2 weeks ago

4.9

455 reviews

5
415
4
31
3
7
2
1
1
1

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions