Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

AQA PSYCHOLOGY PAPER 1 EXAM QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS WITH COMPLETE SOLUTIONS VERIFIED GRADED A++ LATEST UPDATE

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
90
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
28-09-2024
Geschreven in
2024/2025

AQA PSYCHOLOGY PAPER 1 EXAM QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS WITH COMPLETE SOLUTIONS VERIFIED GRADED A++ LATEST UPDATE What was Asch looking into? If participants would conform to the majority. What did people measure? - A Lines How many trials were there (asch) 18 How many participants were there (asch) 123 Who were the participants (asch) USA male undergraduates How many confederates in one group (asch) 6-8 How many out of the 18 trials did the confederates have to give the wrong answer? (asch) 12 How often did the naive participant give the wrong answer? (asch) 36.8% of the time How many people conformed at least once (asch) 75% What explanation of conformity applied to the participants (asch) Normative social influence Weaknesses (asch) Child of its time Artificial situation and task Limited application of findings Variations (asch) Group size Unanimity Task difficulty Unanimity (asch) Whether all the confederates agreed with each other Task difficulty (asch) The lines became similar What happened to the level of conformity when there were 3 confederates (asch) Rose to 31.8% What happened to the level of conformity when there were more than three confederates (asch) Little difference Effect of the presence of a dissenter (asch) Level of conformity decreased to 25% What explanation of conformity plays a bigger part when the talks becomes more difficult? (asch) Informative social influence What happened when the task became more difficult? (asch) Conformity increased Weaknesses (asch) lack of ecological validity Androcentric bias Unethical- participants were decieved demand characteristics Unethical variables (asch) Protection from harm (embarrassment) Deception in what year was the study done? (asch) 1956 what percentage of people never conformed? (asch) 25% what happened to conformity when the task difficulty increased? (asch) conformity increased. What was the conformity rate when one confederate agreed with participant? (asch) 5.5% what was the conformity when one confederate disagreed with the group? (asch) 5.5% deindividuation (zimbardo) loss of identity and inhibition aim (zimbardo) To investigate how people conform to their given social roles (guard/prisoner) participants (zimbardo) 24 US male uni students who were mentally stable (chosen from 75)

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Vak

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

AQA PSYCHOLOGY PAPER 1 EXAM QUESTIONS AND

ANSWERS WITH COMPLETE SOLUTIONS VERIFIED

GRADED A++ LATEST UPDATE


What was Asch looking into?


If participants would conform to the majority.


What did people measure? - A


Lines


How many trials were there (asch)


18


How many participants were there (asch)


123


Who were the participants (asch)


USA male undergraduates


How many confederates in one group (asch)


6-8

,How many out of the 18 trials did the confederates have to give the wrong answer? (asch)


12


How often did the naive participant give the wrong answer? (asch)


36.8% of the time


How many people conformed at least once (asch)


75%


What explanation of conformity applied to the participants (asch)


Normative social influence


Weaknesses (asch)


Child of its time



Artificial situation and task



Limited application of findings


Variations (asch)


Group size

Unanimity

Task difficulty


Unanimity (asch)


Whether all the confederates agreed with each other

,Task difficulty (asch)


The lines became similar


What happened to the level of conformity when there were 3 confederates (asch)


Rose to 31.8%


What happened to the level of conformity when there were more than three confederates (asch)


Little difference


Effect of the presence of a dissenter (asch)


Level of conformity decreased to 25%


What explanation of conformity plays a bigger part when the talks becomes more difficult? (asch)


Informative social influence


What happened when the task became more difficult? (asch)


Conformity increased


Weaknesses (asch)


lack of ecological validity



Androcentric bias



Unethical- participants were decieved



demand characteristics

, Unethical variables (asch)


Protection from harm (embarrassment)

Deception


in what year was the study done? (asch)


1956


what percentage of people never conformed? (asch)


25%


what happened to conformity when the task difficulty increased? (asch)


conformity increased.


What was the conformity rate when one confederate agreed with participant? (asch)


5.5%


what was the conformity when one confederate disagreed with the group? (asch)


5.5%


deindividuation (zimbardo)


loss of identity and inhibition


aim (zimbardo)


To investigate how people conform to their given social roles (guard/prisoner)


participants (zimbardo)


24 US male uni students who were mentally stable (chosen from 75)

Geschreven voor

Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
28 september 2024
Aantal pagina's
90
Geschreven in
2024/2025
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

$12.99
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF


Ook beschikbaar in voordeelbundel

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
NurseAdvocate chamberlain College of Nursing
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
497
Lid sinds
2 jaar
Aantal volgers
77
Documenten
12046
Laatst verkocht
5 uur geleden
NURSE ADVOCATE

I have solutions for following subjects: Nursing, Business, Accounting, statistics, chemistry, Biology and all other subjects. Nursing Being my main profession line, I have essential guides that are Almost A+ graded, I am a very friendly person: If you would not agreed with my solutions I am ready for refund

4.6

239 beoordelingen

5
193
4
14
3
15
2
6
1
11

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen