Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

SPMA 2P27 Test 3 - Finance/accounting

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
19
Cijfer
A
Geüpload op
04-10-2024
Geschreven in
2024/2025

What is the role of athletic in higher education? - Should athletic departments be self-sustaining? - Is this the mandate? - What about other scholastic entities? U.S. Intercollegiate Overview - Approx. 100 member institutions… - Over 30 conferences - Over 460,000 athletes compete - 260+ member universities - focused ‘small athletics programs” NAIA - In 2015, over 60k athletes - 23 conferences situated in locations geographically spread across the country - NJCAA National junior college athletic association- D1,D2,D3 - 2 year college structure - 525 schools, 221 Div.1 - 24 regions Consider NCAA v Usports - pac-12 $3 bill 12 year TV deal - all power 5 have TV deals that average over $200 million - Power 5: ACC, Pac 12, Sec Big 10, Big 12 - Individual schools average over $17 million per year from TV contracts Why do athletic departments still need institutional support (i.e., student fees) to balance their budgets? Why only a handful of public FBS programs were deemed self-sustaining? What about “Pay-to-Play” discussion? - Most NCAA D1 athletic departments take subsidies Is accounting accurate? - Analysis, documentation and adjustment of chargers made between related parties for goods, services or use of property - Transfer pricing: - Facility Rental most athletic programs get charged Market rates for facilities on campus - Student aid “List Price” athletic departments pay the full list price on tuition

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
SPMA 2P27
Vak
SPMA 2P27

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

10/4/24, 12:23 AM SPMA 2P27 Test 3 - Finance/accounting




SPMA 2P27 Test 3

Tues, Nov. 7

NCAA/ USports Class

What is the role of athletic in higher education?
- Should athletic departments be self-sustaining?
- Is this the mandate?
- What about other scholastic entities?

U.S. Intercollegiate Overview
- Approx. 100 member institutions…
- Over 30 conferences
- Over 460,000 athletes compete
- 260+ member universities
- focused ‘small athletics programs” NAIA
- In 2015, over 60k athletes
- 23 conferences situated in locations geographically spread across the country
- NJCAA National junior college athletic association- D1,D2,D3
- 2 year college structure
- 525 schools, 221 Div.1
- 24 regions

Consider NCAA v Usports
- pac-12 $3 bill 12 year TV deal
- all power 5 have TV deals that average over $200 million
- Power 5: ACC, Pac 12, Sec Big 10, Big 12
- Individual schools average over $17 million per year from TV contracts

Why do athletic departments still need institutional support (i.e., student fees) to balance their
budgets?
Why only a handful of public FBS programs were deemed self-sustaining?
What about “Pay-to-Play” discussion?
- Most NCAA D1 athletic departments take subsidies

Is accounting accurate?
- Analysis, documentation and adjustment of chargers made between related parties for
goods, services or use of property
- Transfer pricing:
 most athletic programs get charged Market rates for facilities on
- Facility Rental
campus
- Student aid  “List Price” athletic departments pay the full list price on tuition




about:blank 1/19

,10/4/24, 12:23 AM SPMA 2P27 Test 3 - Finance/accounting




- Licensing Who gets the money from licensing?(Allotments and % split) all money
goes back to the university
- Gift assessment  many people do give money specifically to the athletic dept.  Fees
on gifts 5%...6.5%...12% of gifts go to the universities
- AD fees make up 50% of all assesments at many NCAA schools
- Discounted Tickets  Oregon and staff get a 20% discount…students get a 50% discount
on football and basketball with a cap on amount of seats

 Athletic-produced revenues are often attributed to non-athletic accounts (i.e., parking, and
concession sales). This is another example of transfer pricing which reduces the revenue shown
by athletic departments.

In Sum…
- Based on previous studies and accounting for transfer pricing a mere 10% of athletic
departments lose money
**Transfer pricing practices can drastically alter the athletic departments financial picture
Three more considerations
1. AD status
- NPO status
- There is a lack of incentive for athletic departments to maximize profits
- If surpluses are experienced or anticipated, most directors will increase expenditures to
fully utilize their budgets
2. Title IX and policy
- Presents additional complaints
- Oregan law states “ universities will receive lottery proceeds.”
- Athletic departments cannot refuse these funds or relocate them
- NCAA’s requirement that Div. 1 schools sponsor 16 sports…creates a certain “
cost of doing business”
3. Advertising Effect
- 2016-2011.. Out-of-state freshmen increased from 13.5% to 34%
- BSU Out-of-state tuition was $10,400 higher per student (2012).. $8 million more
annually
- 2007 and 2010 Fiesta Bowl appearances.. enrollment increase of 9.1% and 5.6%
respectively
- More selective too. In 2006, over 70% of applicants were admitted vs. only 54% in
2011 quality of students was enhanced

Paying Athletes
- One of the greatest paradoxes of college athletics is wanting athletic departments to be
self-sustaining and wanting greater compensation for student athletes




about:blank 2/19

, 10/4/24, 12:23 AM SPMA 2P27 Test 3 - Finance/accounting




Tues, Nov.14

Key questions from USports
1. Are scholarships sufficient? AFAs- Athletic Financial Award
2. Where are the fans?
3. Why don’t broadcasters carry games?
4. Is this the best development system?
5. Could/ should/ will more USports schools compete in the NCAA?
6. Should U Sports develop a PAC-10/12? What would consequences be?

Canadian Context of Intercollegiate Sport
- Four regional associations (Canada West, OUA, RSEQ, AUS)
- 56+/- member schools
- accommodating 11,000 athletes
CCAA
- Five regional associations
- 94 member associations
- Ten national championships
- Seven sports (ccaa.com)

“No rink on campus”
- At Brock there is no rink on campus… big challenge but not the answer
- USports schools face a revenue challenge each and every year….
- Lots underlying this

Naming rights?
- Alcohol and Canadian schools’ scholarship?
- UofT and Labatt Blue….

“Scholarships” in Canada
- AFAs… “ about” 70% of roster
- Decision came from university presidents votes
- Academic All-Canadians Athletes who achieve an 80% average while being a full time
student and athlete
- Each individual USports team decides how it will divide its AFA’s among its student
athletes Reification
- i.e., you don’t have to max offer
- **Also, it must be noted that schools are not required (or able) to give away all AFA’s
each year (like NCAA minimums)
How do teams pay for AFA’s?
- Largely team driven…. Golf tournaments…




Too long to read on
your phone? Save to


about:blank 3/19

Geschreven voor

Instelling
SPMA 2P27
Vak
SPMA 2P27

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
4 oktober 2024
Aantal pagina's
19
Geschreven in
2024/2025
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

$11.49
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
lectkesh UNIVERSITY OF LONDON
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
49
Lid sinds
3 jaar
Aantal volgers
48
Documenten
818
Laatst verkocht
1 jaar geleden

0.0

0 beoordelingen

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen