FIRST PUBLISH OCTOBER 2024
ENGR 482 Final Exam Questions and Answers
What is an "artifact"? - Ans:✔✔-any object intentionally created by humans
What is the Common Sense View? - Ans:✔✔-man-made objects are mere tools used by humans
so artifacts have no moral properties
you cannot blame a bomb...the type of entities that are right/wrong are actions performed by human
beings
What is the Strong View? - Ans:✔✔-believes that artifacts do have moral properties
What are the subsets of the Strong View? - Ans:✔✔-Bruno Latour- "morality is inside the things"...
Actor/Network Theory attributes moral relevance to artifacts whose existence perpetuates moral values,
so some combinations of objects and subjects should be thought of as the same entity
Page 1/52
, ©GRACEAMELIA 2024/2025 ACADEMIC YEAR. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
FIRST PUBLISH OCTOBER 2024
Langdon Winner-claims that low overpasses etc. "embody a systematic social inequality" that becomes
"part of the landscape"...social inequality is a moral value, so if this is part of the landscape then
technological artifacts embody morality
Peter-Paul Verbeek-"moral agency is distributed over both humans and technological artifacts"... no
boundary between humans and technology (like Latour)...but many technological artifacts blur the
distinction between subject and object so should ascribe moral agency to hybrid entities consisting of
both subjects and objects
According to the "Common Sense View," technological artifacts take on moral properties when used for
good or evil by human beings
T/F - Ans:✔✔-F
this view holds that artifacts have no moral properties in themselves
The difference between the "Common Sense" and "Strong" views toward the morality of technological
artifacts is a matter of the degree to which people blame artifacts for immoral actions
Page 2/52
, ©GRACEAMELIA 2024/2025 ACADEMIC YEAR. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
FIRST PUBLISH OCTOBER 2024
T/F - Ans:✔✔-F
not a matter of degree, rather fundamental difference between views regarding whether artifacts can be
held morally responsible for certain actions
Bruno Latour, reflecting the "Strong View" toward technological artifacts, believed artifacts are morally
considerable because they work as actants alongside human beings in a responsible network.
T/F - Ans:✔✔-T
Latour calls artifacts "actants" in an "Actor Network," the constituents of which form one and the same
entity that is responsible for certain actions
Which of the following statements best represents the "Strong View" toward the morality of
technological artifacts?
a. A war ship is culpable for immoral acts insofar as it was designed for violent purposes
b. Humans and technological artifacts form an inseparable unit that is itself morally responsible in action
Page 3/52
, ©GRACEAMELIA 2024/2025 ACADEMIC YEAR. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
FIRST PUBLISH OCTOBER 2024
c. Technological artifacts should be held to a separate moral standard that is nonetheless analogous to
human responsibility
d. One should question the morality of certain artifacts if they were designed by immoral persons -
Ans:✔✔-b
It is to this unit that we should attribute moral responsibility, rather than distinguishing between the
human agent and the artifact
Why are Robert Moses' architectural designs indicative of Langdon Winner's view of the moral
properties of artifacts (ie the "Strong View")?
a. his designs were enacted by a government that did not protect civil rights of all citizens
b. moral values are built into his designs, which come to embody these values
c. his designs were build with racist intention
d. exploited labor was used in the construction of his designs - Ans:✔✔-b
Page 4/52