Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

AQA-7717-1A-ENGLISH LITERATURE B FINAL MARK SCHEME PAPER 1A-Literary genres: Aspects of tragedy-A LEVEL-Jun24

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
35
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
24-10-2024
Geschreven in
2024/2025

AQA-7717-1A-ENGLISH LITERATURE B FINAL MARK SCHEME PAPER 1A-Literary genres: Aspects of tragedy-A LEVEL-Jun24. 0 1 Othello – William Shakespeare Read the extract below and then answer the question. Explore the significance of this extract in relation to the tragedy of the play as a whole. Remember to include in your answer relevant analysis of Shakespeare’s dramatic methods. [25 marks] Some possible content is given below. It suggests some of the ways the Assessment Objectives might be addressed, but as ‘significance’ relates to contextual, structural, linguistic and interpretative issues, some ideas will inevitably address more than one AO. In their answer students should refer to the significance that can be seen in the extract and how some of this significance may pertain to the tragedy of the play as a whole. Examiners must also remember that because students have read and studied Othello through the lens of tragedy, the AOs must necessarily be connected to that genre through the task. The students are given an extract so when working on that they should quote directly to support their ideas. This is a closed book exam, so while it is expected that students will use quotations when writing about other parts of the play, it is also legitimate to make more general reference. Please refer to pages 4–8. AO5 Explore literary texts informed by different interpretations With respect to the interpretative significances that can be found, there will be a variety of interpretations here in relation to readers and audiences. Some students might comment on the choices made by directors. Some possible ideas: • the tragic trajectory of the extract from Desdemona’s private despairing musing on Othello’s abuse of her to the discussion between Emilia, Iago and Desdemona about the nature of his abuse and what has led to Othello’s jealousy; Emilia’s ironic touching on the truth when she claims that someone has ‘devised this slander’, a similar ‘squire’ who informed Iago that she had slept with Othello • contextualisation: just before the extract, Othello’s being angry with Desdemona, accusing her of committing adultery and then exiting, Emilia’s failed attempt to comfort Desdemona; Desdemona’s sending Emilia to fetch Iago; following the extract, Desdemona’s appeal to Iago on what she should do to win back Othello’s love; Iago’s deceitful ‘consolation’ that it is only state affairs that trouble Othello; the exit of Desdemona and Emilia and entrance of Roderigo • the sadness and despair of Desdemona as tragic victim • Desdemona’s weeping on stage • her belief that fortune is against her • her goodness which is shown in her wanting heaven to pardon whoever has misinformed Othello • Emilia’s noble defence of her mistress and anger on her behalf • Iago’s feigned innocence • his gloating at the success he has wrought • the irony of Emilia’s light-bulb moment when she thinks that some ‘eternal villain’ must have devised the slande

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Vak

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

000001




AQA MARK SCHEME


A-level




B
ENGLISH LITERATURE B




E
R
7717/1A




TU
Paper 1A Literary genres: Aspects of tragedy




A
R
Mark scheme




TE
June 2024
Version: 1.0 Final
LI
D
N
A
E
G
A
U
G
N
LA
SH
LI
G
EN




Page 1 of 35

,000002


MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL ENGLISH LITERATURE B – 7717/1A – JUNE 2024



Mark schemes are prepared by the Lead Assessment Writer and considered, together with the relevant
questions, by a panel of subject teachers. This mark scheme includes any amendments made at the
standardisation events which all associates participate in and is the scheme which was used by them in
this examination. The standardisation process ensures that the mark scheme covers the students’
responses to questions and that every associate understands and applies it in the same correct way.
As preparation for standardisation each associate analyses a number of students’ scripts. Alternative
answers not already covered by the mark scheme are discussed and legislated for. If, after the
standardisation process, associates encounter unusual answers which have not been raised they are




B
required to refer these to the Lead Examiner.




E
It must be stressed that a mark scheme is a working document, in many cases further developed and
expanded on the basis of students’ reactions to a particular paper. Assumptions about future mark




R
schemes on the basis of one year’s document should be avoided; whilst the guiding principles of




TU
assessment remain constant, details will change, depending on the content of a particular examination
paper.




A
No student should be disadvantaged on the basis of their gender identity and/or how they refer to the




R
gender identity of others in their exam responses.




TE
A consistent use of ‘they/them’ as a singular and pronouns beyond ‘she/her’ or ‘he/him’ will be credited in


LI
exam responses in line with existing mark scheme criteria. D
Further copies of this mark scheme are available from aqa.org.uk
N
A
E
G
A
U
G
N
LA
SH
LI
G
EN




2


Page 2 of 35

,000003


MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL ENGLISH LITERATURE B – 7717/1A – JUNE 2024



Level of response marking instructions
Level of response mark schemes are broken down into levels, each of which has a descriptor. The
descriptor for the level shows the average performance for the level. There are marks in each level.

Before you apply the mark scheme to a student’s answer read through the answer and annotate it (as
instructed) to show the qualities that are being looked for. You can then apply the mark scheme.




B
Step 1 Determine a level




E
Start at the lowest level of the mark scheme and use it as a ladder to see whether the answer meets the




R
descriptor for that level. The descriptor for the level indicates the different qualities that might be seen in




TU
the student’s answer for that level. If it meets the lowest level then go to the next one and decide if it
meets this level, and so on, until you have a match between the level descriptor and the answer. With
practice and familiarity you will find that for better answers you will be able to quickly skip through the




A
lower levels of the mark scheme.




R
TE
When assigning a level you should look at the overall quality of the answer and not look to pick holes in
small and specific parts of the answer where the student has not performed quite as well as the rest. If
the answer covers different aspects of different levels of the mark scheme you should use a best fit

LI
approach for defining the level and then use the variability of the response to help decide the mark within
the level, ie if the response is predominantly level 3 with a small amount of level 4 material it would be
D
placed in level 3 but be awarded a mark near the top of the level because of the level 4 content.
N
A

Step 2 Determine a mark
E



Once you have assigned a level you need to decide on the mark. The descriptors on how to allocate
G




marks can help with this. The exemplar materials used during standardisation will help. There will be an
answer in the standardising materials which will correspond with each level of the mark scheme. This
A




answer will have been awarded a mark by the Lead Examiner. You can compare the student’s answer
U




with the example to determine if it is the same standard, better or worse than the example. You can then
G




use this to allocate a mark for the answer based on the Lead Examiner’s mark on the example.
N




You may well need to read back through the answer as you apply the mark scheme to clarify points and
LA




assure yourself that the level and the mark are appropriate.

Indicative content in the mark scheme is provided as a guide for examiners. It is not intended to be
SH




exhaustive and you must credit other valid points. Students do not have to cover all of the points
mentioned in the Indicative content to reach the highest level of the mark scheme.
LI




An answer which contains nothing of relevance to the question must be awarded no marks.
G
EN




3


Page 3 of 35

, 000004


MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL ENGLISH LITERATURE B – 7717/1A – JUNE 2024



Information for examiners marking Aspects of tragedy: closed book

Welcome to this mark scheme which is designed to help you deliver fair and accurate assessment.
Please read all sections carefully and ensure that you follow the requirements that they contain.

The significance of closed book

Examiners must understand that in marking a closed book exam there are examining implications.
Students do not have their texts in front of them, so while it is expected that they will use quotations, it is




B
also legitimate to use close textual references. They will have had to memorise quotations so there may
be some errors which should not be over penalised. Detailed discussions of particular sections of texts




E
are less likely here than in open book exams. Instead, students may range broadly across their texts as




R
they construct their arguments.




TU
There are specific issues for AO2 – how meanings are shaped in texts. Students will not have their texts
in front of them, so although they will be able to make specific references to structural and organisational




A
issues, comments on other methods may be less specific.




R
TE
Arriving at Marks

1. All questions are framed to address all the Assessment Objectives (AOs). Answers are marked

LI
holistically. Examiners need to read the whole answer taking into account its strengths and
weaknesses and then place it in the appropriate band.
D
N
2. Examiners should avoid making early snap judgements before the whole answer has been read.
Some students begin tentatively but go on to make relevant points.
A


3. Examiners should be prepared to use the full mark range in order to discriminate and not ‘bunch’
E



scripts in the middle for safety.
G
A




4. Examiners should mark positively. Although the possible content of the mark scheme provides some
indicators for what students are likely to write about, examiners should be willing to reward what is
U




actually there – provided of course, that it is relevant to the question being asked.
G




5. Examiners should remember that there are no right answers. Students’ views which are relevant,
N




well-argued and supported by appropriate textual evidence must receive credit whether the examiner
LA




agrees with the views or not. It is important to remain open to a student’s ideas which could be
unusual or unorthodox.
SH




6. Examiners should remember that length and quality are not synonymous. Some brief answers may
be relevant and concise. Equally, long answers may be diffuse and repetitive.
LI




7. If answers are short or incomplete, examiners can only reward what is there and assess
G




accordingly. Some further credit can be given to answers finished in note form.
EN




4


Page 4 of 35

Geschreven voor

Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
24 oktober 2024
Aantal pagina's
35
Geschreven in
2024/2025
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

$12.49
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF


Ook beschikbaar in voordeelbundel

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
revisionmaster111 Arizona State University
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
39
Lid sinds
2 jaar
Aantal volgers
24
Documenten
455
Laatst verkocht
2 maanden geleden

4.5

11 beoordelingen

5
8
4
2
3
0
2
0
1
1

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen