Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

LDR-203S: Collaborative Problem Solving Exam Questions Solved Correctly.

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
21
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
26-10-2024
Geschreven in
2024/2025

Metacognition - Answer "Thinking about thinking" or the ability to evaluate a cognitive task to determine how best to accomplish it, and then to monitor and adjust one's performance on that task metacognition examples - Answer -summon your prior knowledge -think aloud -ask yourself questions "what is confusing about this topi" -use writing -organize your thoughts -take notes from memory as you're reading (engages recall) -review your exams and analyze why you missed something -take a timeout -test yourself - Systems of thinking - Answer S1 - reactive thinking S2- reflective thinking System 1 thinking (S1) - Answer System 1 thinking is a vital decision-making tool that operates in the background of your mind. It aids you in supporting daily activities and making quick decisions. This type of thinking relies heavily on situational cues, prominent memories, trial and error, and heuristic thinking (e.g., discovering solutions for self) to arrive quickly and confidently at judgments. System 2 thinking (S2) - Answer System 2 thinking, or reflective thinking, is broad and informed problem-solving and deliberate decision making. It is useful for judgments in unfamiliar situations, for processing abstract concepts, and for deliberating when there is time for planning and more comprehensive consideration. Argument making is often part of the deliberation process when making System 2 thinking decisions

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
LDR-203S
Vak
LDR-203S

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

LDR-203S: Collaborative Problem
Solving Exam Questions Solved
Correctly.
Metacognition - Answer "Thinking about thinking" or the ability to evaluate a cognitive task to
determine how best to accomplish it, and then to monitor and adjust one's performance on that task



metacognition examples - Answer -summon your prior knowledge

-think aloud

-ask yourself questions "what is confusing about this topi"

-use writing

-organize your thoughts

-take notes from memory as you're reading (engages recall)

-review your exams and analyze why you missed something

-take a timeout

-test yourself

-



Systems of thinking - Answer S1 - reactive thinking

S2- reflective thinking



System 1 thinking (S1) - Answer System 1 thinking is a vital decision-making tool that operates in the
background of your mind. It aids you in supporting daily activities and making quick decisions. This type
of thinking relies heavily on situational cues, prominent memories, trial and error, and heuristic thinking
(e.g., discovering solutions for self) to arrive quickly and confidently at judgments.



System 2 thinking (S2) - Answer System 2 thinking, or reflective thinking, is broad and informed
problem-solving and deliberate decision making. It is useful for judgments in unfamiliar situations, for
processing abstract concepts, and for deliberating when there is time for planning and more
comprehensive consideration. Argument making is often part of the deliberation process when making
System 2 thinking decisions

,analytical thinking - Answer When you think analytically, you are examining and thinking
comprehensively about the different parts or details of something, in order to understand or explain it.
However, you must realize that analytical thought is not simply left brain, logical activity. It's a whole-
brain, purposeful, and necessary approach for developing ideas. For instance, when analyzing a concept,
object, or problem, you may be required to consider the following:



analytical thinking2 - Answer Cause and Effect

Complexity

Similarities and Differences

Possible Solutions and Alternatives

Associations and Disconnections

Steps within a Process

Relationships Between All Parts

Trends

Sequence of Events

Examples



5 W's:

Who, What, When, Where, Why



Analytical thinking is time consuming and requires attention to detail. During times of quick reaction or
with time sensitive issues, it is not recommended to use analytical thinking to solve a problem. As an
NCO and leader, it is essential to know when to consider taking your time to solve the problem or when
to make the call when an issue is time sensitive.



adaptive thinking - Answer Adaptive thinking refers to the cognitive behavior one demonstrates when
confronted by unanticipated circumstances during the execution of a planned activity (e.g. military
operations, emergencies). Developing adaptive thinking does not occur in controlled, predictable, or
calm reflective environments. Rather, it occurs in complex, challenging, and often stressful situations and
requires deliberate practice and repetition. Deliberate practice differs from simply exercising a skill or
ability since it involves the following:

, Repetition

focused feedback

immediacy

focus on weaknesses



Repetition - Answer Task performance occurs repetitively rather than at its naturally occurring
frequency. A goal of deliberate practice is to develop habits that operate expertly and automatically. If
appropriate situations occur relatively infrequently or are widely spaced apart while performing "as you
fight" they will not become readily habitual.



focused feedback - Answer Task performance is evaluated by the coach or learner during performance.
There is a focus on the critical parts of how one does the task and constructive criticism is provided at
regular intervals.



immediacy - Answer After feedback is provided on task performance, there is an immediate repetition
so the task can be performed more in accordance with expert norms.



focus on weaknesses - Answer Deliberate practice can be tailored to the individual and focused on
areas of weakness. During "train as you fight" performances the individual will avoid situations in which
he knows he is weak, and rightly so as there is a desire to do one's best.



efficiency innovation - Answer This type of innovation focuses on identifying new ideas for improving
what already exists. This approach requires minimal investment since the team is building on the past
and only looking for small changes to what is currently being done. These innovations are lower-impact
improvements or adaptations of an organization's existing products, services, programs, or processes.
The strategy for Efficiency Innovation is usually to cut costs, reduce cycle time, improve quality, offset a
competitor's move, or attract new customers. Typically, only small gains are realized.



evolutionary innovation - Answer This type of innovation focuses on identifying ideas that represent
something "distinctly new and improved." An example of an Evolutionary Innovation is the introduction
of automatic banking machines that transformed the way banks viewed their staffing needs and shifted
banking from set hours to banking at any hour.

Evolutionary Innovation requires the team to look more broadly than cost-savings initiatives and see the
"bigger picture" of what is really needed in the organization. Instead of duplicating what already exists,
the team must look for new ways to bring value to the organization and its customers through new and

Geschreven voor

Instelling
LDR-203S
Vak
LDR-203S

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
26 oktober 2024
Aantal pagina's
21
Geschreven in
2024/2025
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

$10.79
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF


Ook beschikbaar in voordeelbundel

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
TestSolver9 Webster University
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
899
Lid sinds
2 jaar
Aantal volgers
127
Documenten
28965
Laatst verkocht
1 dag geleden
TESTSOLVER9 STORE

TOPNOTCH IN LEARNING MATERIALS,(EXAMS,STUDYGUIDES NOTES ,REVIEWS,FLASHCARDS ,ALL SOLVED AND PACKAGED.OUR STORE MAKE YOUR EDUCATION JOURNEY EFFICIENT AND EASY.WE ARE HERE FOR YOU FEEL FREE TO REACH US OUT .

3.5

156 beoordelingen

5
67
4
20
3
27
2
13
1
29

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen