Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

AQA-7181-1-PSYCHOLOGY FINAL MARK SCHEME PAPER 1:Introductory topics in psychology-AS LEVEL-Jun24-v1.0

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
16
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
05-11-2024
Geschreven in
2024/2025

AQA-7181-1-PSYCHOLOGY FINAL MARK SCHEME PAPER 1:Introductory topics in psychology-AS LEVEL-Jun24-v1.0. Section A Social Influence 0 1 Outline how two variables investigated by Asch affected conformity. [4 marks] Marks for this question: AO1 = 4 Level Marks Description 2 3–4 Outline of how two variables affect conformity is clear and has some detail. The answer is generally coherent with appropriate use of specialist terminology. 1 1–2 Outline of how two variables affect conformity lacks clarity and/or detail. The answer as a whole is not clearly expressed. Specialist terminology is either absent or inappropriately used. OR one variable at Level 2/1. 0 No relevant content. Possible content: Asch found that: • changing group size affected level of conformity – up to three confederates levels increased, thereafter they tended to plateau • changing task difficulty affected level of conformity – where the lines were of similar length/making the judgement more difficult, conformity levels increased; when correct answer was obvious/making judgement easier, conformity levels decreased • unanimity affected level of conformity – where the majority were unanimous in their wrong answer, conformity levels increased; when there was an ally, conformity levels decreased; whereas withdrawal of a dissenter led to increased conformity • writing the answer down (rather than saying aloud) reduced conformity • individual differences, eg highly confident individuals conformed less. Credit answers that give relevant variable and associated percentage, ie without reference to increase/decrease. No marks for just naming the variables. Cannot give both marks for same variable with two different effects. Credit other relevant findings in relation to other variables studied by Asch. 000004 Page 4 of 16 PSYCHOLOGY MARK SCHEME – AS PSYCHOLOGY – 7181/1 – JUNE 2024 5 0 2 Explain two ethical limitations of Asch’s investigations into conformity. [4 marks] Marks for this question: AO3 = 4 For each ethical limitation award marks as follows: 2 marks for a clear and coherent explanation of an ethical limitation of Asch’s investigations 1 mark for a muddled or limited explanation. Possible limitations: • deception - participants believed they were taking part in a test of perception • lack of protection from harm - participants were put in a stressful and embarrassing situation • lack of informed consent - participants did not consent to take part in a study of conformity. Credit other relevant ethical limitations. Note: Methodological limitations are not creditworthy. 0 3 Suggest two reasons why Asch’s conformity investigations could be considered to be unrealistic. [4 marks] Marks for this question: AO3 = 4 Level Marks Description 2 3–4 Two reasons why Asch’s conformity investigations could be considered to be unrealistic are clearly explained. Minor detail is sometimes lacking or there is slight inaccuracy. The answer as a whole is clear with appropriate use of specialist terminology. 1 1–2 Two reasons why Asch’s conformity investigations could be considered to be unrealistic lacks detail/accuracy. The answer as a whole lacks clarity. Specialist terminology is either absent or inappropriately used. OR one suggestion at Level 1/2. 0 No relevant content. Possible content: • Asch’s task was artificial because judging line length lacks mundane realism, as it is not a usual task in everyday life • Asch’s situation was artificial because the confederates were strangers/actors, so it was not a valid measurement of how people conform in their usual social contexts • in Asch’s experiment the answer to the question was obvious whereas in real life conformity often occurs where there is no ‘correct’ answer • Asch’s study took place in a laboratory so participants may have guessed the aim of the experiment and changed their behaviour (demand characteristics), therefore this does not reflect conformity in everyday life. Credit other relevant material eg population/temporal validity 000005 Page 5 of 16 PSYCHOLOGY MARK SCHEME – AS PSYCHOLOGY – 7181/1 – JUNE 2024 6 0 4 Studies of social influence are often criticised for using volunteer sampling to select participants. Explain how you could use a different sampling technique to select participants. [2 marks] Marks for this question: AO3 = 2 2 marks for a clear coherent explanation of how a different named sampling technique could be used to select participants. 1 mark for naming a different sampling technique and/or a muddled/limited explanation. Possible content: • opportunity sampling could be used to select participants by the researcher asking people who are willing and available to take part • random sampling could be used to select participants by the researcher putting the names of the members of the target population in a hat and drawing out the required number • stratified sampling could be used to select participants by the researcher by identifying the strata, calculating the proportions and drawing names out of a hat in proportion to the makeup of the population • systematic sampling could be used to select partici

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Vak

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

000001




AQA
MARK SCHEME AQA




AS
PSYCHOLOGY
7181/1




Y
Paper 1 Introductory topics in psychology




G
Mark scheme
June 2024
Version: 1.0 Final LO
O
H
YC
PS




Page 1 of 16

,000002


MARK SCHEME – AS PSYCHOLOGY – 7181/1 – JUNE 2024



Mark schemes are prepared by the Lead Assessment Writer and considered, together with the relevant
questions, by a panel of subject teachers. This mark scheme includes any amendments made at the
standardisation events which all associates participate in and is the scheme which was used by them in
this examination. The standardisation process ensures that the mark scheme covers the students’
responses to questions and that every associate understands and applies it in the same correct way.
As preparation for standardisation each associate analyses a number of students’ scripts. Alternative
answers not already covered by the mark scheme are discussed and legislated for. If, after the
standardisation process, associates encounter unusual answers which have not been raised they are
required to refer these to the Lead Examiner.

It must be stressed that a mark scheme is a working document, in many cases further developed and
expanded on the basis of students’ reactions to a particular paper. Assumptions about future mark
schemes on the basis of one year’s document should be avoided; whilst the guiding principles of
assessment remain constant, details will change, depending on the content of a particular examination




Y
paper.




G
No student should be disadvantaged on the basis of their gender identity and/or how they refer to the
gender identity of others in their exam responses.

A consistent use of ‘they/them’ as a singular and pronouns beyond ‘she/her’ or ‘he/him’ will be credited in

LO
exam responses in line with existing mark scheme criteria.


Further copies of this mark scheme are available from aqa.org.uk
O
H
YC
PS




2


Page 2 of 16

, 000003


MARK SCHEME – AS PSYCHOLOGY – 7181/1 – JUNE 2024



Level of response marking instructions
Level of response mark schemes are broken down into levels, each of which has a descriptor. The
descriptor for the level shows the average performance for the level. There are marks in each level.

Before you apply the mark scheme to a student’s answer read through the answer and annotate it (as
instructed) to show the qualities that are being looked for. You can then apply the mark scheme.

Step 1 Determine a level
Start at the lowest level of the mark scheme and use it as a ladder to see whether the answer meets the
descriptor for that level. The descriptor for the level indicates the different qualities that might be seen in
the student’s answer for that level. If it meets the lowest level then go to the next one and decide if it




Y
meets this level, and so on, until you have a match between the level descriptor and the answer. With
practice and familiarity you will find that for better answers you will be able to quickly skip through the
lower levels of the mark scheme.




G
When assigning a level you should look at the overall quality of the answer and not look to pick holes in
small and specific parts of the answer where the student has not performed quite as well as the rest. If


LO
the answer covers different aspects of different levels of the mark scheme you should use a best fit
approach for defining the level and then use the variability of the response to help decide the mark within
the level, ie if the response is predominantly level 3 with a small amount of level 4 material it would be
placed in level 3 but be awarded a mark near the top of the level because of the level 4 content.

Step 2 Determine a mark
O
Once you have assigned a level you need to decide on the mark. The descriptors on how to allocate
marks can help with this. The exemplar materials used during standardisation will help. There will be an
answer in the standardising materials which will correspond with each level of the mark scheme. This
H

answer will have been awarded a mark by the Lead Examiner. You can compare the student’s answer
with the standardised examples to determine if it is the same standard, better or worse than the
example. You can then use this to allocate a mark for the answer based on the Lead Examiner’s mark
YC


on the example.

You may well need to read back through the answer as you apply the mark scheme to clarify points and
assure yourself that the level and the mark are appropriate.

Indicative content in the mark scheme is provided as a guide for examiners. It is not intended to be
PS




exhaustive and you must credit other valid points. Students do not have to cover all of the points
mentioned in the Indicative content to reach the highest level of the mark scheme.

An answer which contains nothing of relevance to the question must be awarded no marks.




3


Page 3 of 16

Geschreven voor

Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
5 november 2024
Aantal pagina's
16
Geschreven in
2024/2025
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

$13.49
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF


Ook beschikbaar in voordeelbundel

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
revisionmaster111 Arizona State University
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
39
Lid sinds
2 jaar
Aantal volgers
24
Documenten
455
Laatst verkocht
2 maanden geleden

4.5

11 beoordelingen

5
8
4
2
3
0
2
0
1
1

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen