Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

AQA-7182-1-PSYCHOLOGY FINAL MARK SCHEME PAPER 1:Introductory topics in psychology-A LEVEL-Jun24-v1.0

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
16
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
11-11-2024
Geschreven in
2024/2025

AQA-7182-1-PSYCHOLOGY FINAL MARK SCHEME PAPER 1:Introductory topics in psychology-A LEVEL-Jun24-v1.0. Section A Social influence 0 1 Outline one ethical issue that has arisen in social influence research. Refer to one or more social influence studies in your answer. [4 marks] Marks for this question: AO1 = 4 Outline content: Up to 2 marks for the outline of the ethical issue Award 1 mark for identification of the ethical issue, and 1 further mark for elaboration • Deception; protection from harm; the right to withdraw. • Participants in a study should not be knowingly misled or lied to • Participants should not be exposed to any more risk than they would encounter in everyday life • Participants should be able to leave the investigation at any time If more than one ethical issue is outlined credit the best Up to 2 marks for reference to one or more social influence studies 2 marks for clear and effective reference to one or more social influence studies 1 mark for limited / muddled reference to one or more social influence studies • In Milgram’s obedience study, participants did not know the shocks were not real; in Asch’s conformity study, participants were not aware the other participants were confederates of the experimenter • In Milgram’s study, participants exhibited signs of extreme stress – sweating, shaking, etc.; in Zimbardo’s study, prisoners showed signs of disorganised thinking and behaviour • Milgram’s participants were encouraged to continue through the use of verbal prods; Zimbardo’s participants were denied requests to leave. Credit other valid points. 000004 Page 4 of 16 PSYCHOLOGY MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL PSYCHOLOGY – 7182/1 – JUNE 2024 5 0 2 Use your knowledge of conformity to explain Charlie’s behaviour. [6 marks] Marks for this question: AO2 = 6 Level Marks Description 3 5–6 Application of knowledge of conformity is clear and effective. The answer is generally coherent with appropriate use of terminology. 2 3–4 There is some appropriate application of knowledge of conformity. The answer lacks clarity in places. Terminology is used appropriately on occasions. 1 1–2 There is limited application of knowledge of conformity. The answer, as a whole, lacks clarity and has inaccuracies. Terminology is either absent or inappropriately used. 0 No relevant content. Possible content: • Charlie may be conforming due to normative social influence – his decision to wear his jumper inside-out is motivated by a desire to fit in with the group and avoid being isolated. This pressure may be felt particularly keenly as he is new to the school (and presumably may not have many other friends). • Charlie may be demonstrating compliance – his ‘worrying’ suggests that he is conflicted, but decides to wear his jumper inside-out (publicly) even though, internally, he may not agree with the behaviour • Charlie may be demonstrating identification – the fact that he thinks the boys are ‘cool’, values the group membership and displays group behaviour Credit other relevant application points, eg external locus of control; group size and unanimity (lack of an ally); research studies can be credited if they are clearly linked to the scenario No explicit application to the scenario maximum of 1 mark Note: that it would be difficult to make a case for internalisation/informational social influence in this scenario, but students may be awarded credit if they do. 000005 Page 5 of 16 PSYCHOLOGY MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL PSYCHOLOGY – 7182/1 – JUNE 2024 6 0 3 Use your knowledge of obedience to explain the boys’ behaviour. [6 marks] Marks for this question: AO2 = 6 Level Marks Description 3 5–6 Application of knowledge of obedience is clear and effective. The answer is generally coherent with appropriate use of terminology. 2 3–4 There is some appropriate application of knowledge of obedience. The answer lacks clarity in places. Terminology is used appropriately on occasions. 1 1–2 There is limited application of knowledge of obedience. The answer, as a whole, lacks clarity and has inaccuracies. Terminology is either absent or inappropriately used. 0 No relevant content. Possible content: • the boys obeyed because the Headteacher is a legitimate authority figure – in a hierarchical system, like a school, those who impose the rules have the power to punish, in this case with a detention • the boys obeyed due to situational variables, eg location – the boys are summoned to the Headteacher’s office; proximity of authority figure – the Headteacher is issuing orders face-to-face; lack of social support – the boys are called to the office ‘one-by-one’ • the boys obeyed due to being in an agentic state – when the boys then decided to wear their jumper correctly. • some of the boys may have an authoritarian personality, respect for those they perceive to be in authority and therefore blindly obey the Headteacher No explicit application to the scenario maximum of 1 mark Credit other relevant application points e.g. External locus of control, uniform. Research studies can be credited if they clearly linked to the scenario. 000006 Page 6 of 16 PSYCHOLOGY MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL PSYCHOLOGY – 7182/1 – JUNE 2024 7 0 4 Discuss consistency and flexibility as processes involved in minority influence. [8 marks] Marks for this question: AO1 = 3, AO3 = 5 Level Marks Description 4 7–8 Knowledge of consistency and flexibility as processes involved in minority influence is accurate with some detail. Discussion is thorough and effective. Minor detail and/or expansion of argument is sometimes lacking. The answer is clear, coherent and focused. Specialist terminology is used effectively. 3 5–6 Knowledge of consistency and flexibility as processes involved in minority influence is evident but there are occasional inaccuracies/omissions. Discussion is mostly effective. The answer is mostly clear and organised but occasionally lacks focus. Specialist terminology is used appropriately. 2 3–4 Limited knowledge of consistency and/or flexibility as processes involved in minority influence is present. Focus is mainly on description. Any discussion is of limited effectiv

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Vak

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

000001




AQA
A-level
PSYCHOLOGY
7182/1




Y
Paper 1 Introductory topics in psychology
Mark scheme




G
June 2024
Version: 1.0 Final LO
O
H
YC
PS




Page 1 of 16

,000002


MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL PSYCHOLOGY – 7182/1 – JUNE 2024



Mark schemes are prepared by the Lead Assessment Writer and considered, together with the relevant
questions, by a panel of subject teachers. This mark scheme includes any amendments made at the
standardisation events which all associates participate in and is the scheme which was used by them in
this examination. The standardisation process ensures that the mark scheme covers the students’
responses to questions and that every associate understands and applies it in the same correct way.
As preparation for standardisation each associate analyses a number of students’ scripts. Alternative
answers not already covered by the mark scheme are discussed and legislated for. If, after the
standardisation process, associates encounter unusual answers which have not been raised they are
required to refer these to the Lead Examiner.

It must be stressed that a mark scheme is a working document, in many cases further developed and
expanded on the basis of students’ reactions to a particular paper. Assumptions about future mark
schemes on the basis of one year’s document should be avoided; whilst the guiding principles of
assessment remain constant, details will change, depending on the content of a particular examination




Y
paper.

No student should be disadvantaged on the basis of their gender identity and/or how they refer to the




G
gender identity of others in their exam responses.

A consistent use of ‘they/them’ as a singular and pronouns beyond ‘she/her’ or ‘he/him’ will be credited in
LO
exam responses in line with existing mark scheme criteria.

Further copies of this mark scheme are available from aqa.org.uk.
O
H
YC
PS




2


Page 2 of 16

, 000003


MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL PSYCHOLOGY – 7182/1 – JUNE 2024



Level of response marking instructions
Level of response mark schemes are broken down into levels, each of which has a descriptor. The
descriptor for the level shows the average performance for the level. There are marks in each level.

Before you apply the mark scheme to a student’s answer read through the answer and annotate it (as
instructed) to show the qualities that are being looked for. You can then apply the mark scheme.

Step 1 Determine a level
Start at the lowest level of the mark scheme and use it as a ladder to see whether the answer meets the
descriptor for that level. The descriptor for the level indicates the different qualities that might be seen in
the student’s answer for that level. If it meets the lowest level then go to the next one and decide if it
meets this level, and so on, until you have a match between the level descriptor and the answer. With




Y
practice and familiarity you will find that for better answers you will be able to quickly skip through the
lower levels of the mark scheme.




G
When assigning a level you should look at the overall quality of the answer and not look to pick holes in
small and specific parts of the answer where the student has not performed quite as well as the rest. If
the answer covers different aspects of different levels of the mark scheme you should use a best fit
LO
approach for defining the level and then use the variability of the response to help decide the mark within
the level, ie if the response is predominantly level 3 with a small amount of level 4 material it would be
placed in level 3 but be awarded a mark near the top of the level because of the level 4 content.

Step 2 Determine a mark
O
Once you have assigned a level you need to decide on the mark. The descriptors on how to allocate
marks can help with this. The exemplar materials used during standardisation will help. Answers in the
standardising materials will correspond with the different levels of the mark scheme. These answers will
H

have been awarded a mark by the Lead Examiner. You can compare the student’s answer with the
standardised examples to determine if it is the same standard, better or worse than the example. You
can then use this to allocate a mark for the answer based on the Lead Examiner’s mark on the example.
YC



You may well need to read back through the answer as you apply the mark scheme to clarify points and
assure yourself that the level and the mark are appropriate.

Indicative content in the mark scheme is provided as a guide for examiners. It is not intended to be
PS




exhaustive and you must credit other valid points. Students do not have to cover all of the points
mentioned in the indicative content to reach the highest level of the mark scheme.

An answer which contains nothing of relevance to the question must be awarded no marks.




3


Page 3 of 16

Geschreven voor

Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
11 november 2024
Aantal pagina's
16
Geschreven in
2024/2025
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

$11.99
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF


Ook beschikbaar in voordeelbundel

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
revisionmaster111 Arizona State University
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
39
Lid sinds
2 jaar
Aantal volgers
24
Documenten
455
Laatst verkocht
2 maanden geleden

4.5

11 beoordelingen

5
8
4
2
3
0
2
0
1
1

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen