SEX AND RACE DISCRIMINATION REVISION SHEET
Preparatory Reading:
Cases
q The cases an materials referred to in Lectures 7 and 8
Textbook
q Cabrelli’s Employment Law in Context (Chapters 10 and 11); or
q Selwyn’s Law of Employment (Chapter 4); or
q Smith & Wood’s Employment Law (Chapter 5)
Statute
q Equality Act 2010 – Section 9 (definition of ‘race’)
q Equality Act 2010 – Sections11 (definition of ‘sex’)
q Equality Act 2010 – Sections 13,19,26,27,39
q Equality Act 2010 – Schedule 9
Cases
q Amnesty International v Ahmed [2009] IRLR 884 EAT
q Aylott v Stockton on Tees Borough Council [2010] IRLR 994 CA
q Aziz v Trinity Street Taxis Ltd [1986] IRLR 435 EAT
q Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Poilce v Khan [2001] IRLR 830 HL
q Crown Suppliers (Property Services Agency) v Dawkins [1993] ICR 517
q Deer v University of Oxford [2015] IRLR 481 CA
q Horsey v Dyfed County Council [1982] IRLR 395 EAT
q Igen v Wong [2005] IRLR 258 CA
q Insitu Cleaning Co v Heads [1995] IRLR 4 EAT
q Mandla V Dowell Lee [1983] AC 548
q Northern Joint Police Board v Power [1997] IRLR 610
q Richmond Pharmacology Ltd v Dhaliwal [2009] IRLR 336 EAT
q Showboat Entertainment v Owens [1984] 1 WLR 384
Journals
q S.Fredman, ‘The Reason Why: Unravelling Indirect Discrimination (2016) 45
Ind Law Journal 231
q B.Burton, ‘Neoliberalisim and the Equality Act 2010: A Missed Opportunity for
Gender Justice? (2014) 43 Ind Law Journal 112
Prepare answers to the following questions and come to the seminar ready to
present these to the group:
Preparatory Reading:
Cases
q The cases an materials referred to in Lectures 7 and 8
Textbook
q Cabrelli’s Employment Law in Context (Chapters 10 and 11); or
q Selwyn’s Law of Employment (Chapter 4); or
q Smith & Wood’s Employment Law (Chapter 5)
Statute
q Equality Act 2010 – Section 9 (definition of ‘race’)
q Equality Act 2010 – Sections11 (definition of ‘sex’)
q Equality Act 2010 – Sections 13,19,26,27,39
q Equality Act 2010 – Schedule 9
Cases
q Amnesty International v Ahmed [2009] IRLR 884 EAT
q Aylott v Stockton on Tees Borough Council [2010] IRLR 994 CA
q Aziz v Trinity Street Taxis Ltd [1986] IRLR 435 EAT
q Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Poilce v Khan [2001] IRLR 830 HL
q Crown Suppliers (Property Services Agency) v Dawkins [1993] ICR 517
q Deer v University of Oxford [2015] IRLR 481 CA
q Horsey v Dyfed County Council [1982] IRLR 395 EAT
q Igen v Wong [2005] IRLR 258 CA
q Insitu Cleaning Co v Heads [1995] IRLR 4 EAT
q Mandla V Dowell Lee [1983] AC 548
q Northern Joint Police Board v Power [1997] IRLR 610
q Richmond Pharmacology Ltd v Dhaliwal [2009] IRLR 336 EAT
q Showboat Entertainment v Owens [1984] 1 WLR 384
Journals
q S.Fredman, ‘The Reason Why: Unravelling Indirect Discrimination (2016) 45
Ind Law Journal 231
q B.Burton, ‘Neoliberalisim and the Equality Act 2010: A Missed Opportunity for
Gender Justice? (2014) 43 Ind Law Journal 112
Prepare answers to the following questions and come to the seminar ready to
present these to the group:
