COMPLETE SOLUTIONS VERIFIED
Bias
prejudice in favor of or against one thing, person, or group compared with another,
usually in a way considered to be unfair.
Descriptive Research
Describes characteristics and phenomena without underlyingcausal mechanisms
Discussion
•Relationship to existing literature
•Hypothesis revisited
•Future questions and directions
Abstract
-purpose/hypothesis
-rationale, context, importance of research
Double-blind review
-neither the authors' nor peer reviewers' identities are shared with each other, is thought
to be the fairest system, but there is evidence that it does not affect reviewer behavior
or influence decisions
external validity
application of the results to a larger sample (Draw sample then generalize back to the
population)
,internal validity
are you certain that the results are due to the intervention
biological error vs technical error
experimental research
- Allows scientists to comment on cause and effect
- Investigators control for as many variables as possible except the intervention
- Likely has a control or placebo group
-investigator manipulates IV and measures DV to imply cause-effect
A hypothesis should always
-explain what you expect to happen
-be clear and understandable
-be testable
-be measurable
-contain an independent and dependent variable
Alternative vs. Null Hypothesis
Alternate Hypotheis (H1): the means will be different
Null Hypothesis (Ho):
-no difference between the two means
-is typically tested and either supported or refuted with p > or < 0.05
research (directional) hypothesis
•what the person actually believes will occur
-"Fat use is positively related to VO2max;"
-"Interval training has a significant effect on increasing insulin sensitivity."
, null hypothesis
-statement that there is NO RELATIONSHIP b/w variables
-There is no relationship b/w BW and VO2max
-There is no difference in %BF b/w men and women
Introduction
•Purpose-Hypothesis
•Rationale, context, and importance of research
methods
•Approach to the research problem
•Experimental design
•Participants
•Independent and dependent variables
•Statistical analysis
peer review
-Peer review is the evaluation of work by one or more people with similar competencies
as the producers of the work. It functions as a form of self-regulation by qualified
members of a profession within the relevant field
results
•Descriptive and experimental findings presented succinctly
Scientific Method
1. pose a question
2. seek an answer in existing literature
3. develop a hypothesis