Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

Work and organisational psychology second exam summary (UvA, first year, second semester, bachelor psychology)

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
2
Pagina's
38
Geüpload op
23-12-2024
Geschreven in
2023/2024

This is the summary I made myself with both the lectures as the book. I got a high grade when learning with my summary so I hope it will help you get a good grade as well! Good luck fellow student! :)

Instelling
Vak

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

WOP II
Team dynamics
Team: Groups of two or more people who:
- Influence one another
- Exist to achieve goals associated with organizational objectives
- Are interdependent: Coordinate, share information
- Perceive themselves to be a team

Team characteristics:
1. Permanence
a. How long a team exists (hours to years)
2. Skill diversity
a. Variety of member skills & knowledge
3. Authority dispersion
a. Degree to which decision-making responsibility is distributed
throughout the team (high dispersion) or centralized, one or
a few members (low dispersion)

Informal groups in organizations (NO TEAMS!): Groups that exist
primarily for the benefit of their members (yet they can benefit
organizations!)
They exist because:
- Innate drive to bond (creating social networks which is beneficial
for organization)
- Social identity (we define us by group memberships)
- Achieve personal objectives (coalitions with others), cannot be
achieved alone

Types of teams:
- Self-directed teams
o Success factors:
 Responsible for entire work process
 High interdependence within the team, independent
from other teams
 Autonomy to organizes and coordinate work
 Work site/technology support team
communication/coordination and job enrichment
- Virtual/remote teams
o Members operate across space, time and firm’s boundaries,
linked through information technologies
 Increasingly possible (and possible) due to technologies,
knowledge-based work & globalization
o Success factors:
 Member characteristics (e.g., technology savvy)
 Flexible use of various communication technologies
 Fairly high task structures (e.g., clear objectives)
 Opportunities to meet face-to-face

,Team advantages and disadvantages
Team advantages:
- Breadth of knowledge & expertise
- Diversity of perspectives
- Potential for synergy & creativity
Can lead to:
- Better decisions, products/services, information sharing &
coordination
- Higher employee motivation: Drive to bond, accountability to team
members, benchmarks (other’s performance is a benchmark how
you should perform)

Team disadvantages:
- Process losses (resources expended towards developing &
maintaining teams instead of task)
o Brook’s law (adding people might slow down project)
- Social loafing: People exert less effort in a team
o Ringelmann effect: Group performance was better than
individual performance but the individual performance in team
(per person) was decreased
 This loss increases as group becomes larger
o More likely when:
 Individual performance hidden/indistinguishable
 Solution: Make individual performance visible
o Smaller teams
o Measure individual performance in a team
o Specialize task
 Work has low significance (boring)
 Individual characteristics (low conscientiousness and
low agreeableness)
 Team dynamics undermine employee motivation (e.g.,
low cohesion)
 Solution: Increase employee/team motivation
o Increase job enrichment
o Increase awareness of social loafing and
team obligations
o Select motivated, team-oriented employees

Team effectiveness model:

,- Organizational and Team Environment:
o Broad supportive resource pool available, supportive &
inspiring leader
o Frequent communication encouraged by workplace design &
technology
o Possible external motivating forces (e.g., competition) or
team-based rewards

- Team Design
o Task characteristics
 Complex tasks divisible into specialized roles
 Well-structured tasks
 Higher task interdependence (only when sharing
common goal)
 Pooled interdependence (sharing pooled
recourses)
 Sequential interdependence (one’s output is
forwarded to the next employee to add to it and
pass it along)
 Reciprocal interdependence (work output is
exchanged back and forth)
 Low task variability & high task analyzability
o Team size
 Smaller teams are better (± ≤6)
 Less process loss: Less coordination, quicker
agreement
 Faster team development
 More engaged with team (know members better)
 Feel more responsible for team’s success
 Team must be large enough to accomplish task
o Team composition
 The 5 Cs model
 Team members
must engage in task
work and team work
o Task work:
Behaviors that
complete the
assigned tasks
o Team work:
5Cs behaviors
that support
the team
 Diversity: The presence
of a variety of
backgrounds, perspectives, experiences, and attributes
among team members
o Advantage: Different perspectives & broader
knowledge base, better representation

, o Disadvantage: Slower team development,
susceptible to fault lines (categorizing)
 Demographic diversity: Surface-level
characteristics
 Psychological diversity: Traits and attitudes

- Team processes
o Team development
 Existing teams might regress back to an earlier
stage of
development
 Forming: Learn
about each other;
evaluate membership
 Storming: Conflict;
compete for roles;
influence
goals/means
 Norming: Roles
clear; consensus
objectives, common
understanding,
develop cohesion
 Performing: Efficient coordination; high cooperation +
trust; commitment to team objectives; strong team
identity
 Adjourning: Disbanding; shift from task to relationship
focus
o Team norms
 Informal rules & shared expectations that help a group
regulate (group-relevant) behavior
 Norms develop through:
o Initial team experiences
o Critical events in team’s history
o Experience and values members bring to the
team
o Team cohesion
 Degree of attraction people feel toward the team and
their motivation to remain members
 Team role: Set of behaviors that people are expected to
perform because of their role in a team
 Team cohesion is stronger & occurs faster with:
o Higher member (coworker) similarity
o Smaller team size
o Regular and frequent member interaction
o Somewhat difficult entry into the team
o Higher team success
o More external competition and challenges
 Particularly when:

Geschreven voor

Instelling
Studie
Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
23 december 2024
Aantal pagina's
38
Geschreven in
2023/2024
Type
SAMENVATTING

Onderwerpen

$7.25
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF


Ook beschikbaar in voordeelbundel

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
Lijssiea Universiteit van Amsterdam
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
14
Lid sinds
1 jaar
Aantal volgers
0
Documenten
15
Laatst verkocht
1 week geleden

2.5

2 beoordelingen

5
0
4
1
3
0
2
0
1
1

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen