SOLUTIONS
Intentional Torts - ✅✅✅CORRECT -The intentional torts are battery, assault, false imprisonment,
trespass to land, trespass to chattel, and conversion.
Battery - ✅✅✅CORRECT -Battery is the intentional unlawful, harmful or offensive touching of the
person of another.
Assault - ✅✅✅CORRECT -Assault is the intentional threatening of another with a battery and the
creating of apprehension of immediate bodily harm in the victim.
Transferred Intent Doctrine - ✅✅✅CORRECT -The Transferred Intent Doctrine is applicable when a
defendant, while in the process of committing a battery against one person, unintentionally causes the
touching of a third person. In such a case, the defendant's wrongful intent is transferred to include the
unintended victim. The third person can therefore proceed against the defendant on a battery theory.
Substantial Certainty Doctrine - ✅✅✅CORRECT -The Substantial Certainty Doctrine holds that where
the defendant does an act with the realization that it is substantially certain to result in a touching, the
defendant is deemed to have intended the result and is liable for the battery.
False Imprisonment - ✅✅✅CORRECT -False imprisonment is the intentional confinement of the
plaintiff by the defendant, without consent and without legal privilege.
Trespass to Land - ✅✅✅CORRECT -Trespass to land is an entry upon land in the possession of
another, without consent and without legal privilege.
Trespass to Chattel - ✅✅✅CORRECT -Trespass to chattel is the intentional taking or damaging of
personal property in the possession of another, without consent and without legal privilege.
,Conversion - ✅✅✅CORRECT -Conversion is an intentional assumption of dominion and control over
the personal property of another resulting in a substantial interference with the plaintiff's possessory
rights, without consent and without legal privilege.
Trespass Ab Initio - ✅✅✅CORRECT -Trespass ab initio is an entry upon the land in possession of
another under a conferred legal right, and the subsequent abusing of that conferred legal right through
the commission of an assault, battery, false imprisonment, or trespass.
Private Nuisance - ✅✅✅CORRECT -A private nuisance results from an act or conduct by the
defendant which unreasonably interferes with the plaintiff's use and enjoyment of his or her property.
Public Nuisance - ✅✅✅CORRECT -Public nuisance results from an act or conduct by the defendant
which is injurious to the public in general.
Defenses to Intentional Torts - ✅✅✅CORRECT -Defenses to intentional torts are consent, self-
defense, defense of others, defense of property, prevention of crime, recovery of property, legal
authority, and necessity.
Consent - ✅✅✅CORRECT -Consent relates to the plaintiff's state of mind and the existence of
express or implied willingness that the defendant should act in the complained of manner.
The Defense of Self-Defense - ✅✅✅CORRECT -Self-defense is a defense that relates to the general
proposition that a person who reasonably believes himself to be threatened with immediate bodily harm
may use whatever degree of force is apparently necessary to protect himself or herself.
The Defense of Defense of Others - ✅✅✅CORRECT -The defense of others relates to the general
proposition that a person who reasonably believes another to be threatened with immediate bodily
harm may use whatever degree of force is apparently necessary to protect the personal safety of the
other person.
Step-In-Shoes Jurisdiction (Defense of Others) - ✅✅✅CORRECT -In some jurisdictions a person is not
allowed to use the defense of defense of others unless the person being defended was not the aggressor
and had the right to use self-defense.
, Reasonable Appearances Jurisdictions (Defense of Others) - ✅✅✅CORRECT -In other jurisdictions a
person defending another in good faith and in ignorance of the fact that the person being defended is
the aggressor and not entitled to use self-defense is nevertheless justified when acting upon reasonable
appearances. Sometimes it is further required that the person being defended is one whom the
defender is authorized by statute to protect.
The Defense of Defense of Property - ✅✅✅CORRECT -The defense of defense of property relates to
the general proposition that a person may be privileged to use reasonable force to protect his or her
possession of real or personal property against an apparent trespasser.
The Defense of Prevention of Crime - ✅✅✅CORRECT -The defense of prevention of crime relates to
the general proposition that any person, whether a police officer or a private person, is privileged to use
reasonable force to prevent the commission of a crime which is apparently being attempted in his or her
presence.
The Defense of Recovery of Property - ✅✅✅CORRECT -The defense of recovery of property relates
to the general proposition that a person is privileged to commit an act which would otherwise constitute
an intentional tort if he or she is acting for the purpose of regaining possession of his or her property.
There are three separate aspects to this particular defense. They are re-entry upon land, recapture of
chattel, and the "Shopkeeper's Rule".
Re-entry Upon Land Aspect - ✅✅✅CORRECT -The re-entry upon land aspect mentioned above
relates to one's privilege to use force to re-enter land only if the taking of the land was tortious or
wrongful and the re-entering party is entitled to immediate possession. Ordinarily, a demand must be
made for the occupier to vacate unless such a demand would be a total exercise in futility. Only force not
likely to cause death or serious bodily harm may be used.
Recapture of Chattel Aspect - ✅✅✅CORRECT -The recapture of chattel aspect of the defense related
to recovery of property relates to one's privilege to use reasonable force to defend against chattels being
taken from his or her possession if such force is not likely to cause death or serious bodily harm.
Shopkeeper's Rule Aspect - ✅✅✅CORRECT -The "Shopkeeper's Rule" aspect of the defense of
recovery of property relates to a limited privilege in some jurisdictions that allows shopkeepers to detain
suspected thieves i.e., shoplifters or embezzling employees, for the purpose of investigating the
shopkeeper's claim to the goods, even though it may be determined that no wrongful taking has been
committed.