Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

Test Bank for Advanced Assessment, 5th Edition by Mary Jo Goolsby.pdf

Beoordeling
5.0
(1)
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
236
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
26-01-2025
Geschreven in
2024/2025

Test Bank for Advanced Assessment, 5th Edition by Mary Jo G

Instelling
Vak

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Created k By:k Ak Solution


TEST BANK FOR ADVANCED ASSESSMENT: INTERPRETING
k k k k k k




FINDINGS AND FORMULATING DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSES
k k k k k




5TH EDITION, MARY JO GOOLSBY, LAURIE GRUBBS ISBN-
k k k k k k k




10; 1719645930 / ISBN-13; 978-1719645935 A+
k k k k k



Chapterk1.kAssessmentkandkClinicalkDecision-Making:kOverview


Multiplek Choice
Identifyk thek choicek that k best k completesk thek statement k ork answersk thek question.
k


Whichk typek of k clinicalk decision-makingk isk most k reliable?
A. Intuitive
B. Analytical
C. Experiential
D. Augenblick
Whichk of k thek followingk isk false?k Tok obtaink adequatek history,k health-carek providersk must k be:
A. Methodicalk and k systematic
B. Attentivek tok thek patient’sk verbalk and k nonverbalk language
C. Ablek tok accuratelyk interpret k thek patient’sk responses
D. Adept k at k readingk intok thek patient’sk statements
Essentialk partsk of k ak healthk historyk includek allk of k thek followingk except:
A. Chief k complaint
B. Historyk of k thek present k illness
C. Current k vitalk signs
D. Allk of k thek abovek arek essentialk historyk components
Whichk of k thek followingk isk false?k Whilek performingk thek physicalk examination,k thek examinerk must k b
ek ablek to:
A. Differentiatek betweenk normalk and k abnormalk findings
B. Recallk knowledgek of k ak rangek of k conditionsk and k theirk associated k signsk and k symptoms
C. Recognizek howk certaink conditionsk affect k thek responsek tok otherk conditions
D. Foreseek unpredictablek findings


A+ Pagek1

,Created k By:k Ak Solution


Thek followingk isk thek least k reliablek sourcek of k informationk fork diagnostick statistics:
A. Evidence-based k investigations
B. Primaryk reportsk of k research
C. Estimationk based k onk ak provider’sk experience
D. Published k meta-analyses
Thek followingk cank bek used k tok assist k ink sound k clinicalk decision-making:
A. Algorithmk published k ink ak peer-reviewed k journalk article
B. Clinicalk practicek guidelines
C. Evidence-based k research
D. Allk of k thek above
If k ak diagnostick studyk hask highk sensitivity,k thisk indicatesk a:
A. Highk percentagek of k personsk withk thek givenk conditionk willk havek ank abnormalk result
B. Low k percentagek of k personsk withk thek givenk conditionk willk havek ank abnormalk result
C. Low k likelihood k of k normalk result k ink personsk without k ak givenk condition
D. Nonek of k thek above
k
k


If k ak diagnostick studyk hask highk specificity,k thisk indicatesk a:
A. Low k percentagek of k healthyk individualsk willk showk ak normalk result
B. Highk percentagek of k healthyk individualsk willk showk ak normalk result
C. Highk percentagek of k individualsk withk ak disorderk willk show k ak normalk result
D. Low k percentagek of k individualsk withk ak disorderk willk show k ank abnormalk result
Ak likelihood k ratiok abovek 1k indicatesk that k ak diagnostick test k showingk a:
A. Positivek result k isk stronglyk associated k withk thek disease
B. Negativek result k isk stronglyk associated k withk absencek of k thek disease
C. Positivek result k isk weaklyk associated k withk thek disease
D. Negativek result k isk weaklyk associated k withk absencek of k thek disease
k


k kkk 10.k Whichk of k thek followingk clinicalk reasoningk toolsk isk defined k ask evidence-
based k resourcek based k onk mathematicalk modelingk tok expressk thek likelihood k ofk akconditionk ink select k s
ituations,k settings,k and/ork patients?
A. Clinicalk practicek guideline
B. Clinicalk decisionk rule

A+ Pagek2

,Created k By:k Ak Solution


C. Clinicalk algorithm
D. Clinicalk recommendation
k


Answerk Section


MULTIPLEk CHOICE


1. ANS:k B
Croskerryk (2009)k describesk twok majork typesk of k clinicalk diagnostick decision-
making:k intuitivek and k analytical.k Intuitivek decision-makingk (similark tok Augenblinkk decision-
making)k isk based k onk thek experiencek and k intuitionk of k thek cliniciank and k isk lessk reliablek and k paired k wit
hk fairlyk commonk errors.k Ink contrast,k analyticalk decision-
makingk isk based k onk carefulk considerationk and k hask greaterk reliabilityk withk rarek errors.


PTS: 1
2. ANS:k D
Tok obtaink adequatek history,k providersk must k bekwellk organized,k attentivek tok thek patient’sk verbalk and k
nonverbalk language,k and k ablek tok accuratelyk interpret k thekpatient’sk responsesk tokquestions.k Ratherk th
ank readingk intok thek patient’sk statements,k theyk clarifyk anyk areask of k uncertainty.


PTS: 1
3. ANS:k C
Vitalk signsk arek part k of k thekphysicalk examinationk portionk of k patient k assessment,k notk part kofk thek health
k history.


PTS: 1
4. ANS:k D
Whilek performingk thek physicalk examination,k thek examinerk must k bek ablek tok differentiatek betweenk no
rmalk and k abnormalk findings,k recallk knowledgek of k akrangek ofk conditions,k includingk theirk associatedks
ignsk and k symptoms,k recognizek howk certaink conditionsk affectk thek responsek tok otherk conditions,k and k
distinguishk thek relevancek of k varied k abnormalk findings.


A+ Pagek3

, Created k By:k Ak Solution


PTS: 1
5. ANS:k C
Sourcesk fork diagnostick statisticsk includek textbooks,k primaryk reportsk of k research,k and k published k met
a-
analyses.k Anotherk sourcek of k statistics,k thek onekthat khask beenk most kwidelyk usedk andkavailablek fork app
licationk tok thek reasoningk process,k isk thek estimationk based k onk ak provider’sk experience,k althoughk thes
ek arek rarelyk accurate.k Overk thek past k decade,k thek availabilityk of k evidencek onkwhichk tok basek clinicalk re
asoningk isk improving,k and k therek isk ank increasingk expectationk that k clinicalk reasoningk bek based k onk sci
entifick evidence.k Evidence-
based k statisticsk arek alsok increasinglyk beingk used k tok developk resourcesk tok facilitatek clinicalk decision-
making.


PTS: 1
6. ANS:k D
Tok assist k ink clinicalk decision-making,k ak numberk of k evidence-
based k resourcesk havek beenk developed k tok assist k thekclinician.k Resources,k suchk ask algorithmsk and k clin
icalk practicek guidelines,k assist k ink clinicalk reasoningk whenk properlyk applied.
k


PTS: 1
7. ANS:k A
Thek sensitivityk of k ak diagnostick studyk isk thek percentagekof kindividualsk withkthektarget k conditionk whok
show k ank abnormal,k ork positive,k result.k A k highk sensitivityk indicatesk that k ak greaterk percentagek of k pers
onsk withk thek givenk conditionk willk havek ank abnormalk result.


PTS: 1
8. ANS:k B
Thek specificityk of k ak diagnostick studykisk thekpercentagek ofk normal,k healthyk individualsk whok havek ak n
ormalk result.k Thek greaterk thek specificity,k thek greaterk thek percentagek ofkindividualsk whok willk havek ne
gative,k ork normal,k resultsk if k theyk dok not k havek thek target k condition.


PTS: 1
9. ANS:k A

A+ Pagek4

Gekoppeld boek

Geschreven voor

Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
26 januari 2025
Aantal pagina's
236
Geschreven in
2024/2025
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

$18.49
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF


Ook beschikbaar in voordeelbundel

Beoordelingen van geverifieerde kopers

Alle reviews worden weergegeven
1 jaar geleden

5.0

1 beoordelingen

5
1
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0
Betrouwbare reviews op Stuvia

Alle beoordelingen zijn geschreven door echte Stuvia-gebruikers na geverifieerde aankopen.

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
Testbankguruu university
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
87
Lid sinds
1 jaar
Aantal volgers
4
Documenten
536
Laatst verkocht
2 weken geleden
TEST BANK GURU

Welcome to TestBanksGuru, your go-to source for high-quality test banks and study materials designed to help you excel academically. We offer a comprehensive range of resources including test banks, study guides, solution manuals, and other study materials, all meticulously curated to ensure accuracy and effectiveness. Our affordable, instantly accessible materials are complemented by excellent customer support, making your learning experience seamless and efficient. Trust Testbanksguru to be your partner in academic success, providing the tools you need to achieve your educational goals.

Lees meer Lees minder
4.9

1744 beoordelingen

5
1624
4
97
3
13
2
1
1
9

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen