MARKING SCHEME k
LEVEL 3 APPLIED DIPLOMA IN CRIMINOLOGY
k k k k k
UNIT 2 k
SUMMER 2017 k k
4543U20-1
©k WJECk CBACk
Ltd.
,INTRODUCTION
Thisk markingk schemek wask usedk byk WJECk fork thek 2017k examination.k Itk wask finalisedk
afterk detailedk discussionk atk examiners'k conferencesk byk allk thek examinersk involvedk ink
thek assessment.k Thek conferencek wask heldk shortlyk afterk thek paperk wask takenk sok thatk
referencek couldk bek madek tok thek fullk rangek ofk candidates'k responses,k withk photocopiedk
scriptsk formingk thek basisk ofk discussion.k Thek aimk ofk thek conferencek wask tok ensurek thatk
thek markingk schemek wask interpretedk andk appliedk ink thek samek wayk byk allk examiners.
Itk isk hopedk thatk thisk informationk willk bek ofk assistancek tok centresk butk itk isk recognisedk atk
thek samek timek that,k withoutk thek benefitk ofk participationk ink thek examiners'k conference,k
teachersk mayk havek differentk viewsk onk certaink mattersk ofk detailk ork interpretation.
WJECk regretsk thatk itk cannotk enterk intok anyk discussionk ork correspondencek aboutk thisk
markingk scheme.
©k WJECk CBACk
Ltd.
, LEVELk 3k APPLIEDk DIPLOMAk INk CRIMINOLOGYk
SUMMERk 2017k MARKk SCHEME
UNITk 2
Answerk allk questions
1. Paul,k ank unemployedk localk man,k hask beenk convictedk ofk murderk afterk gettingk
intok ak fightk withk Iank overk ank allegationk ofk theftk ofk money.k Paulk alsok hask
numerousk previousk convictionsk fork drugk dealingk andk theft.k Hek hask beenk ink
carek sincek thek agek ofk 7,k afterk hisk parentsk werek givenk longk custodialk
sentences.k Ian’sk father,k ak localk barrister,k hask startedk ak campaignk tok bringk
backk capitalk punishmentk fork crimesk ofk murder.k Hisk campaignk hask attractedk thek
attentionk ofk localk mediak andk politicians.
(a) Brieflyk explaink howk onek typek ofk mediak mightk bek usedk byk Ian’sk fatherk tok
promotek hisk campaignk tok bringk backk capitalk punishment. [2]
(b) Explaink howk campaignsk suchk ask reinstatingk capitalk punishmentk mightk
influencek policyk making. [5]
(c) (i) Describek anyk onek individualistick theoryk ofk criminality. [5]
(ii) Analysek howk thek theoryk describedk abovek cank bek appliedk tok
Paul’sk situation. [5]
(d) Evaluatek thek effectivenessk ofk ak rangek ofk individualistick criminologicalk
theoriesk tok explaink causesk ofk criminality. [8]
2. Grantville,k ak smallk ruralk town,k wask oncek ak pleasantk placek tok live.k Howeverk
overk thek lastk 10k years,k crimek hask steadilyk increased.k Offencesk suchk ask
prostitution,k vagrancy,k possessionk ofk cannabisk andk motoringk offencesk suchk ask
speedingk arek nowk commonplace.k Residentsk oftenk dok notk reportk criminalk acts.k
Thek localk newspaperk oftenk reportsk storiesk aboutk crimek ink thek townk andk
recentlyk publishedk thek followingk headline:
POLICEk AREk LOSINGk CONTROLk OFk GRANTVILLEk
THEk TOWNk ISk INk THEk HANDSk OFk CRIMINALS
Thek newspaperk isk alsok backingk ak localk councillork whok isk runningk fork thek
positionk ofk mayork ofk thek town.k Thek councillor,k Mrk Mackie,k supportsk newk policingk
policiesk suchk ask zerok tolerance.k Hek intendsk tok bringk ink suchk ank approachk tok
helpk reducek crimek andk restorek lawk andk order.
(a) Describek howk thek headlinek ink thek newspaperk couldk causek ak moralk panic. [2]
(b) Brieflyk explaink whyk somek crimesk arek notk reportedk tok thek police. [3]
(c) Comparek criminalityk andk deviancek withk referencek tok relevantk examples. [5]
(d) Examinek thek crimek controlk policyk optionsk thatk Mrk Mackiek couldk introducek
ifk electedk ask mayor. [6]
(e) Withk referencek tok examples,k analysek howk lawsk changek duek tok time,k
placek andk culture. [9]
1
©k WJECk CBACk
Ltd.
LEVEL 3 APPLIED DIPLOMA IN CRIMINOLOGY
k k k k k
UNIT 2 k
SUMMER 2017 k k
4543U20-1
©k WJECk CBACk
Ltd.
,INTRODUCTION
Thisk markingk schemek wask usedk byk WJECk fork thek 2017k examination.k Itk wask finalisedk
afterk detailedk discussionk atk examiners'k conferencesk byk allk thek examinersk involvedk ink
thek assessment.k Thek conferencek wask heldk shortlyk afterk thek paperk wask takenk sok thatk
referencek couldk bek madek tok thek fullk rangek ofk candidates'k responses,k withk photocopiedk
scriptsk formingk thek basisk ofk discussion.k Thek aimk ofk thek conferencek wask tok ensurek thatk
thek markingk schemek wask interpretedk andk appliedk ink thek samek wayk byk allk examiners.
Itk isk hopedk thatk thisk informationk willk bek ofk assistancek tok centresk butk itk isk recognisedk atk
thek samek timek that,k withoutk thek benefitk ofk participationk ink thek examiners'k conference,k
teachersk mayk havek differentk viewsk onk certaink mattersk ofk detailk ork interpretation.
WJECk regretsk thatk itk cannotk enterk intok anyk discussionk ork correspondencek aboutk thisk
markingk scheme.
©k WJECk CBACk
Ltd.
, LEVELk 3k APPLIEDk DIPLOMAk INk CRIMINOLOGYk
SUMMERk 2017k MARKk SCHEME
UNITk 2
Answerk allk questions
1. Paul,k ank unemployedk localk man,k hask beenk convictedk ofk murderk afterk gettingk
intok ak fightk withk Iank overk ank allegationk ofk theftk ofk money.k Paulk alsok hask
numerousk previousk convictionsk fork drugk dealingk andk theft.k Hek hask beenk ink
carek sincek thek agek ofk 7,k afterk hisk parentsk werek givenk longk custodialk
sentences.k Ian’sk father,k ak localk barrister,k hask startedk ak campaignk tok bringk
backk capitalk punishmentk fork crimesk ofk murder.k Hisk campaignk hask attractedk thek
attentionk ofk localk mediak andk politicians.
(a) Brieflyk explaink howk onek typek ofk mediak mightk bek usedk byk Ian’sk fatherk tok
promotek hisk campaignk tok bringk backk capitalk punishment. [2]
(b) Explaink howk campaignsk suchk ask reinstatingk capitalk punishmentk mightk
influencek policyk making. [5]
(c) (i) Describek anyk onek individualistick theoryk ofk criminality. [5]
(ii) Analysek howk thek theoryk describedk abovek cank bek appliedk tok
Paul’sk situation. [5]
(d) Evaluatek thek effectivenessk ofk ak rangek ofk individualistick criminologicalk
theoriesk tok explaink causesk ofk criminality. [8]
2. Grantville,k ak smallk ruralk town,k wask oncek ak pleasantk placek tok live.k Howeverk
overk thek lastk 10k years,k crimek hask steadilyk increased.k Offencesk suchk ask
prostitution,k vagrancy,k possessionk ofk cannabisk andk motoringk offencesk suchk ask
speedingk arek nowk commonplace.k Residentsk oftenk dok notk reportk criminalk acts.k
Thek localk newspaperk oftenk reportsk storiesk aboutk crimek ink thek townk andk
recentlyk publishedk thek followingk headline:
POLICEk AREk LOSINGk CONTROLk OFk GRANTVILLEk
THEk TOWNk ISk INk THEk HANDSk OFk CRIMINALS
Thek newspaperk isk alsok backingk ak localk councillork whok isk runningk fork thek
positionk ofk mayork ofk thek town.k Thek councillor,k Mrk Mackie,k supportsk newk policingk
policiesk suchk ask zerok tolerance.k Hek intendsk tok bringk ink suchk ank approachk tok
helpk reducek crimek andk restorek lawk andk order.
(a) Describek howk thek headlinek ink thek newspaperk couldk causek ak moralk panic. [2]
(b) Brieflyk explaink whyk somek crimesk arek notk reportedk tok thek police. [3]
(c) Comparek criminalityk andk deviancek withk referencek tok relevantk examples. [5]
(d) Examinek thek crimek controlk policyk optionsk thatk Mrk Mackiek couldk introducek
ifk electedk ask mayor. [6]
(e) Withk referencek tok examples,k analysek howk lawsk changek duek tok time,k
placek andk culture. [9]
1
©k WJECk CBACk
Ltd.
