Business Law Final Exam Questions With Accurate Answers
In Ohio the state trial court that hears civil and criminal cases is called - correct answer -Common Pleas
The Writ that must be issued by the US Supreme Court in order for a case to be heard by the high court
is called which of the following. - correct answer -Certiorari
"Triers of Fact" refers to which of the following: - correct answer -Juries
Which best describes the natural law theory of jurisprudence of which St. Thomas Aquinas was a
proponent? - correct answer -Only laws which have a moral basis are laws that must be obeyed.
A wishes to sue B in a civil action based upon federal law. Which statement about Federal question
jurisdiction is true? - correct answer -A would bring her action in the U.S. Federal District Court
The Ohio Courts of Common Pleas and Federal District Courts are both trial courts. - correct answer -
True
What federal circuit court of appeals is Ohio in? - correct answer -6th Circuit
A business person can always expect to have her case heard by a federal court as long as the amount in
controversy is greater than $75K. - correct answer -False
When a case is heard on appeal in Ohio, a trial court jury rehears the testimony. - correct answer -False
In the area of Alternative Dispute Resolution in both Mediation and Arbitration an actual award or
judgment is made. - correct answer -False
Civil cases can decide both liability and guilt. - correct answer -False
Keuhn v. Pub Zone is a criminal case. - correct answer -False
Which statement below is NOT accurate in describing the procedural outcome of Keuhn v. Pub Zone: -
correct answer -On appeal the court found that the Pub Zone did not have a duty to protect to the
plaintiff.
Considering the outcome in Keuhn v. Pub Zone it is correct to say in hindsight that it is a bad business
decision to set a policy and not follow it. - correct answer -True
You've read that under common law all prior cases can be used as precedent to help courts decide
subsequent cases. Is it correct to say that the judges in the Keuhn case set the precedent that business
owners are the insurers of their patrons' safety. - correct answer -False
Although factually dissimilar, both the Keuhn and McCollum cases turn upon the legal precept that the
foreseeability of harm is a key in determining liability. - correct answer -True
In Ohio the state trial court that hears civil and criminal cases is called - correct answer -Common Pleas
The Writ that must be issued by the US Supreme Court in order for a case to be heard by the high court
is called which of the following. - correct answer -Certiorari
"Triers of Fact" refers to which of the following: - correct answer -Juries
Which best describes the natural law theory of jurisprudence of which St. Thomas Aquinas was a
proponent? - correct answer -Only laws which have a moral basis are laws that must be obeyed.
A wishes to sue B in a civil action based upon federal law. Which statement about Federal question
jurisdiction is true? - correct answer -A would bring her action in the U.S. Federal District Court
The Ohio Courts of Common Pleas and Federal District Courts are both trial courts. - correct answer -
True
What federal circuit court of appeals is Ohio in? - correct answer -6th Circuit
A business person can always expect to have her case heard by a federal court as long as the amount in
controversy is greater than $75K. - correct answer -False
When a case is heard on appeal in Ohio, a trial court jury rehears the testimony. - correct answer -False
In the area of Alternative Dispute Resolution in both Mediation and Arbitration an actual award or
judgment is made. - correct answer -False
Civil cases can decide both liability and guilt. - correct answer -False
Keuhn v. Pub Zone is a criminal case. - correct answer -False
Which statement below is NOT accurate in describing the procedural outcome of Keuhn v. Pub Zone: -
correct answer -On appeal the court found that the Pub Zone did not have a duty to protect to the
plaintiff.
Considering the outcome in Keuhn v. Pub Zone it is correct to say in hindsight that it is a bad business
decision to set a policy and not follow it. - correct answer -True
You've read that under common law all prior cases can be used as precedent to help courts decide
subsequent cases. Is it correct to say that the judges in the Keuhn case set the precedent that business
owners are the insurers of their patrons' safety. - correct answer -False
Although factually dissimilar, both the Keuhn and McCollum cases turn upon the legal precept that the
foreseeability of harm is a key in determining liability. - correct answer -True
