Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

NRNP/PRAC 6665 & 6675 Focused SOAP Psychiatric Evaluation Exemplar

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
6
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
16-03-2025
Geschreven in
2024/2025

NRNP/PRAC 6665 & 6675 Focused SOAP Psychiatric Evaluation Exemplar © 2022 Walden University Page 1 of 6 INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO USE EXEMPLAR AND TEMPLATE—READ CAREFULLY If you are struggling with the format or remembering what to include, follow the Focused SOAP Note Evaluation Template AND the Rubric as your guide. It is also helpful to review the rubric in detail in order not to lose points unnecessarily because you missed something required. After reviewing full details of the rubric, you can use it as a guide. In the Subjective section, provide: • Chief complaint • History of present illness (HPI) • Past psychiatric history • Medication trials and current medications • Psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis • Pertinent substance use, family psychiatric/substance use, social, and medical history • Allergies • ROS Read rating descriptions to see the grading standards! In the Objective section, provide: • Physical exam documentation of systems pertinent to the chief complaint, HPI, and history • Diagnostic results, including any labs, imaging, or other assessments needed to develop the differential diagnoses. Read rating descriptions to see the grading standards! In the Assessment section, provide: • Results of the mental status examination, presented in paragraph form. • At least three differentials with supporting evidence. List them from top priority to least priority. Compare the DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria for each differential diagnosis and explain what DSM-5-TR criteria rules out the differential diagnosis to find an accurate diagnosis. Explain the criticalthinking process that led you to the primary diagnosis you selected. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case. • Read rating descriptions to see the grading standards! Reflect on this case. Include: Discuss what you learned and what you might do differently. Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations (demonstrate critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
NRNP/PRAC 6665 & 6675
Vak
NRNP/PRAC 6665 & 6675

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

NRNP/PRAC 6665 & 6675 Focused SOAP Psychiatric Evaluation
Exemplar


INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO USE EXEMPLAR AND TEMPLATE—READ
CAREFULLY

If you are struggling with the format or remembering what to include, follow the Focused
SOAP Note Evaluation Template AND the Rubric as your guide. It is also helpful to
review the rubric in detail in order not to lose points unnecessarily because you missed
something required. After reviewing full details of the rubric, you can use it as a guide.

In the Subjective section, provide:

• Chief complaint
• History of present illness (HPI)
• Past psychiatric history
• Medication trials and current medications
• Psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis
• Pertinent substance use, family psychiatric/substance use, social, and
medical history
• Allergies
• ROS
Read rating descriptions to see the grading standards!

In the Objective section, provide:

• Physical exam documentation of systems pertinent to the chief complaint,
HPI, and history
• Diagnostic results, including any labs, imaging, or other assessments needed
to develop the differential diagnoses.
Read rating descriptions to see the grading standards!

In the Assessment section, provide:

• Results of the mental status examination, presented in paragraph form.
• At least three differentials with supporting evidence. List them from top priority
to least priority. Compare the DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria for each
differential diagnosis and explain what DSM-5-TR criteria rules out the
differential diagnosis to find an accurate diagnosis. Explain the critical-
thinking process that led you to the primary diagnosis you selected. Include
pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case.
• Read rating descriptions to see the grading standards!
Reflect on this case. Include: Discuss what you learned and what you might do
differently. Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical
considerations (demonstrate critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent



© 2022 Walden University Page 1 of 6

, NRNP/PRAC 6665 & 6675 Focused SOAP Psychiatric Evaluation
Exemplar


for treatment!), social determinates of health, health promotion and disease prevention
taking into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and
other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.).

(The FOCUSED SOAP psychiatric evaluation is typically the follow-up visit patient note.
You will practice writing this type of note in this course. You will be focusing more on the
symptoms from your differential diagnosis from the comprehensive psychiatric
evaluation narrowing to your diagnostic impression. You will write up what symptoms
are present and what symptoms are not present from illnesses to demonstrate you have
indeed assessed for illnesses which could be impacting your patient. For example,
anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, bipolar symptoms, psychosis symptoms,
substance use, etc.)

EXEMPLAR BEGINS HERE

Subjective:

CC (chief complaint): A brief statement identifying why the patient is here. This
statement is verbatim of the patient’s own words about why presenting for assessment.
For a patient with dementia or other cognitive deficits, this statement can be obtained
from a family member.

HPI: Begin this section with patient’s initials, age, race, gender, purpose of evaluation,
current medication and referral reason. For example:

N.M. is a 34-year-old Asian male presents for medication management follow up for
anxiety. He was initiated sertraline last appt which he finds was effective for two weeks
then symptoms began to return.

Or

P.H., a 16-year-old Hispanic female, presents for follow up to discuss previous
psychiatric evaluation for concentration difficulty. She is not currently prescribed
psychotropic medications as we deferred until further testing and screening was
conducted.

Then, this section continues with the symptom analysis for your note. Thorough
documentation in this section is essential for patient care, coding, and billing analysis.

Paint a picture of what is wrong with the patient. First what is bringing the patient to your
follow up evaluation? Document symptom onset, duration, frequency, severity, and
impact. What has worsened or improved since last appointment? What stressors are
they facing? Your description here will guide your differential diagnoses into your



© 2022 Walden University Page 2 of 6

Geschreven voor

Instelling
NRNP/PRAC 6665 & 6675
Vak
NRNP/PRAC 6665 & 6675

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
16 maart 2025
Aantal pagina's
6
Geschreven in
2024/2025
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

$11.49
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
TopGradeSolutions Chamberlain College Of Nursing
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
97
Lid sinds
2 jaar
Aantal volgers
9
Documenten
13297
Laatst verkocht
6 uur geleden
TOPGRADESOLUTIONS

Here we offer revised study materials to elevate your educational outcomes. We have verified learning materials (Research, Exams Questions and answers, Assignments, notes etc) for different courses guaranteed to boost your academic results. We are dedicated to offering you the best services and you are encouraged to inquire further assistance from our end if need be. Having a wide knowledge in Nursing, trust us to take care of your Academic materials and your remaining duty will just be to Excel. Remember to give us a review, it is key for us to understand our clients satisfaction. We highly appreciate clients who always come back for more of the study content we offer, you are extremely valued. All the best.

Lees meer Lees minder
4.9

171 beoordelingen

5
159
4
7
3
4
2
0
1
1

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen