Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

NSG 6999 Week 5 knowledge Check Quiz / NSG6999 Week 5 knowledge Check Quiz(Latest, 2020): South University (100% Correct)

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
4
Geüpload op
29-06-2020
Geschreven in
2019/2020

NSG 6999 Week 5 Quiz Question 1 (1 point) There are three questions that should be asked for all studies. One is “Will the results help me in caring for my patients?” When looking at this question you are looking for: Question 1 options: Were the study patients similar to my own? Were there appropriate numbers of patients studied? Were data methods appropriate for the issue studied? Were there steps to avoid bias or confounding? Question 2 (1 point) When participants of a study are placed in groups based on their wish to be in the study—or volunteers. This is a type of Question 2 options: Measurement bias Selection bias Recall bias Information bias Question 3 (1 point) What is the definition of a systematic review? Question 3 options: A statistical approach to synthesizing the results of a number of studies that produces a larger sample size and thus greater power to determine the true magnitude of an effect. Used to obtain a single-effect measure of the results of all studies. A research review that includes published papers that support an author’s particular point of view and usually serves as a general background discussion of a particular issue. An explicit and systematic approach to searching for and evaluating papers is usually not used. A compilation of like studies to address a specific clinical question using a detailed, comprehensive search strategy and rigorous appraisal methods for the purpose of summarizing, appraising, and communicating the results and implications of all the research available on a clinical question. It is the most rigorous approach to minimization of bias in summarizing research A multi-method or pluralistic approach, using different methods in order to focus on the research topic from different viewpoints and to produce a multi-faceted set of data. Also used to check the validity of findings from any one method Question 4 (1 point) What is the definition of a meta-analysis? Question 4 options: A statistical approach to synthesizing the results of a number of studies that produces a larger sample size and thus greater power to determine the true magnitude of an effect. Used to obtain a single-effect measure of the results of all studies. A research review that includes published papers that support an author’s particular point of view and usually serves as a general background discussion of a particular issue. An explicit and systematic approach to searching for and evaluating papers is usually not used. A compilation of like studies to address a specific clinical question using a detailed, comprehensive search strategy and rigorous appraisal methods for the purpose of summarizing, appraising, and communicating the results and implications of all the research available on a clinical question. It is the most rigorous approach to minimization of bias in summarizing research. A multi-method or pluralistic approach, using different methods in order to focus on Commented [MS26]: Add an option “d” the research topic from different viewpoints and to produce a multi-faceted set of data. Also used to check the validity of findings from any one method Question 5 (1 point) What is the definition of a narrative review? Question 5 options: A statistical approach to synthesizing the results of a number of studies that produces a larger sample size and thus greater power to determine the true magnitude of an effect. Used to obtain a single-effect measure of the results of all studies. A research review that includes published papers that support an author’s particular point of view and usually serves as a general background discussion of a particular issue. An explicit and systematic approach to searching for and evaluating papers is usually not used. A compilation of like studies to address a specific clinical question using a detailed, comprehensive search strategy and rigorous appraisal methods for the purpose of summarizing, appraising, and communicating the results and implications of all the research available on a clinical question. It is the most rigorous approach to minimization of bias in summarizing research. A multi-method or pluralistic approach, using different methods in order to focus on the research topic from different viewpoints and to produce a multi-faceted set of data. Also used to check the validity of findings from any one method.

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Vak

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

NSG 6999 Week 5 Quiz

Question 1 (1 point)

There are three questions that should be asked for all studies.

One is “Will the results help me in caring for my patients?”

When looking at this question you are looking for:


Question 1 options:


Were the study patients similar to my own?


Were there appropriate numbers of patients studied?


Were data methods appropriate for the issue studied?


Were there steps to avoid bias or confounding?




Question 2 (1 point)



When participants of a study are placed in groups based on

their wish to be in the study—or volunteers. This is a type of

Geschreven voor

Instelling
Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
29 juni 2020
Aantal pagina's
4
Geschreven in
2019/2020
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Alleen vragen

Onderwerpen

$4.99
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF


Ook beschikbaar in voordeelbundel

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
SOUTHUNIVERSITYEXAM South University
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
254
Lid sinds
6 jaar
Aantal volgers
215
Documenten
699
Laatst verkocht
2 maanden geleden

3.4

48 beoordelingen

5
21
4
3
3
9
2
4
1
11

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen