Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Space & Environment in the European Union: full summary!!

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
31
Uploaded on
26-03-2025
Written in
2024/2025

Summary of the course "Space & Environment in the European Union", structered in the order of the Lectures.

Institution
Course

Content preview

Space & Environment in the European Union
EU governance
What is the EU?  a treaty-based organisation, member states may withdraw
 Has some state-like characteristics, but never in full
 Is a funding machinery
 A common market within common rules
o Rules at each level need to be aligned to each other
o The EU does not enforce its own laws
 It adopts legislation
 Supremacy of EU law does not exist in all policy areas
 A geo-political project
o External trade policy
o Foreign & defence policy coordination
o Speaking with one voice in international organizations
 Climate agreements
 World Trade Organization
o Development policy, international peace-keeping missions
Member States (MS):
o All have their own constitution
o The EU treaties function as a constitution as well
o MS may withdraw (Brexit)

Federalism = the ideal of a federal union (late 1940s)
 The “de facto” organization of a political system, spread over different
levels of government
 A centralized EU ‘super-state’
The European Union:
 Has ‘supranational’ decision powers, but not in all policy areas
 Competition policy = the Commission decides alone
o Or the European Parliament and the Council of Ministers
 No direct implementation in MS -> national variation
 Joint decision trap = risk-averse decision-making, because it is difficult
to move policies away from the ‘status quo’ (the existing state of affairs)
European Parliament:
o Very powerful, but limited media attention
o National politics dominate the public debate

European Commission:
o Very influential, council work dominated by civil servants
o System depends on interaction between EU and MS (civil servants)

,History of European integration
= History of treaties and enlargements
1945 – 1951: the runup to the ECSC
 End of WW2 - > start of Cold War (geopolitics)
o reconstruction of Europe
 Pushes for European integration:
o Marshall plan: US aid on condition of EU cooperation
o Fear of communist revolts (mainly in Italy and Germany)
 Interdependence as solution to inter-state rivalries (earlier ideas on
federalisation)
 Various intergovernmental responses:
o NATO & Council of Europe (Human rights)
 1951: Paris Treaty (ECSC)
o 1950: Schuman-Declaration
o Intention to build a Coal and Steel community (beyond
intergovernmental cooperation)
 France: a way to restrain Germany and secure access to
natural sources
o Germany and Italy looked for ways to re-gain international
legitimacy
1952 – 1957: from Paris to Rome
 Defence and Political community failed (too sensitive)
 Blows to global power of France and UK
o Military defeats and decolonization
 1957: Treaty of Rome (European economic community + EURATOM)
o Creation of a common market
 Tree trade inside EEC, external tariffs, international
competition policy
o Common Agricultural policy, Regional funds, Social funds, Nuclear
Energy
The workings of the EEC: ‘Community Method’
- Commission
o Not a decision maker, but exclusive right of legislative initiative
- Assembly (later the European Parliament)
o Advisory function only
o Until 1979: delegates from national parliaments.
 From 1979: elections
- Council of Ministers (per policy sector)
o Legislates
o Voting rules depend on policy sector
Stagnation in the 60s:
 Charles de Gaulle: blocked accession of the UK twice
o Blocked decision-making in the Council -> the ‘empty chair crisis’
 Led to ‘Luxembourg Compromise’: when there is a vital
interest, states are not outvoted
Optimism of early 1970s: DK, UK, IE join the European Community
 First non-economic policies adopted (environment!), backed by Court of
Justice
 But then: era of economic stagnation and inflation began

,  Margaret Thatcher: era of economic downturn
o Failing agricultural policy (subsidized overproduction)
o UK did not accept being a net contributor


1986: Single European Act
 Expansion of Treaty of Rome
o Creating a truly open market
o Revision of QMV (Qualified Majority voting) rules in the Council
o European Parliament gets a formal say (cooperation procedure)
1989: The end of the Cold War
 Optimism: German reunification, ‘the end of history’, European integration
1993: Maastricht Treaty -> European Union
 1st Pillar: the EEC/SEA as we knew it, but:
o More policy issues included
o Co-decision procedure
o More issues Unanimity (QMV)
 2nd Pillar: Common Foreign and Security Policy
o EP not involved, no legislation
 3 Pillar: Justice and Home Affairs
rd

o EP not involved, EUROPOL
 Extra: commitment to common currency
1999: Amsterdam Treaty
 1st Pillar: reform of co-decision so that EP becomes truly equal to the
Council
 2nd Pillar: include Defence cooperation: high representation
 3rd Pillar: import Schenen into EU
2003: Nice Treaty
 Extension of co-decision to other policy areas
 Unanimity -> QMV in more policy areas
 Reform of QMV rules (point system)
 De facto merger of 1st and 3rd pillar
 1 Commissioner per member state
 Calls for simplification
Constitutional Treaty & Lisbon Treaty: “convention on the future of Europe”
 Idea: prepare a draft constitution (still a treaty), and make it short and
simple
o More power to the European Parliament
o Legal simplification and extra power in criminal prosecution
o Symbols like flag, anthem, etc.
2009: Lisbon Treaty
 European Council now a formal institution with a president
 Co-decision becomes the norm
 Reduction of Commissioners in Commission (not implemented)
 Procedure for leaving the EU
Widening = more member states join the EU
Deeping = the EU regulates over more subject areas, and never more deeply

, General trend: Less unanimity, more qualified majority voting in the Council,
Stronger role for the European Parliament




The EU and money
The N.A.T.O model: four key policy instruments for governments:
1. Nodality: centralized communication (EU: weak)
2. Authority: rule-making and enforcement (EU: strong, but indirect)
3. Treasure: financial incentives (EU: it depends; scattered)
4. Organisation: structure of public service provision (EU: medium, and
indirect)
Financial incentives -> the EU budget
 How is it decided? -> two different budgetary procedures:
1. Commission prepares draft budget -> council presents amendments -
> EP accepts or rejects -> meeting between EP and Council members -
> acceptance, or all over again
2. Multi-Annual Financial Framework: commission prepares draft
budget -> Council needs to be unanimous -> EP accepts or rejects
 7 year cycle:
o EU budget becomes more predictable
o But less flexible (in case of emergencies)
o Reduces major political contestation to once every 7 years
o Major EU (spending) policies now also have a 7 year cycle

State’s budget EU’s budget
Spending  Civil servants  civil servants
 Buildings  buildings
 Government  EU institutions
 Army, hospitals,  Cohesion policy,
schools, regional
infrastructure development,
 subsidies agricultural
Earnings  Tax income, VAT  Contributions from
 Fines, excise Member States
duties (cigarettes,  EU taxes : VAT,
alcohol, sugar) carbon tax, single
use plastic
 Customs duties


 Balance: return
to MS or ask for
more money
In sum: the EU budget is small but its expenditure is quite targeted
What if a crisis strikes?
 Covid: some countries were hit much harder, massive recovery fund was
created (double the EU budget)
o EU borrowed money on the capital market (Eurobonds) with low
interest

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
March 26, 2025
Number of pages
31
Written in
2024/2025
Type
SUMMARY

Subjects

$8.31
Get access to the full document:

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
meikeector

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
meikeector Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
-
Member since
5 year
Number of followers
0
Documents
1
Last sold
-

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions