Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

CLA2601 Assignment 1 (ANSWERS) Semester 1 2025 - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
7
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
04-04-2025
Written in
2024/2025

Well-structured CLA2601 Assignment 1 (ANSWERS) Semester 1 2025 - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED. (DETAILED ANSWERS - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED!)..... Question 1 Zane, Bongi, Muthu and Sophy are friends who decide to form a partnership to purchase and sell new and secondhand mobile phones. Sophy and Bongi will provide the capital to purchase the initial stock for the partnership. Zane will be responsible for the repair of mobile phones and Muthu will be responsible for the day-to-day activities regarding the sales, administration and marketing of the mobile phone business. The parties agree that the profit derived from the partnership will be divided equally between Bongi, Sophy and Zane, and that Muthu will receive a monthly salary for his services. Discuss and explain whether the above terms constitute a valid partnership agreement. Refer to relevant case law in your answer. 10 marks Question 2 Explain the formalities and requirements that partners who wish to enter into a partnership agreement must adhere to in order to conclude a valid partnership agreement. Refer to relevant case law where applicable.

Show more Read less
Institution
Course

Content preview

CLA2601
Assignment 1 Semester 1 2025
Unique Number: 770912
Due Date: 7 April 2025
QUESTION 1 (2 ANSWERS PROVIDED)



For a valid partnership to exist in South African law, certain essentialia must be present:

(a) at least two persons agree to act in common;
(b) each contributes something—whether money, skill, or labour;
(c) the enterprise is carried on for their joint benefit; (d) the object is the making of
profit; and
(d) the intention is that each partner shares in the net profit and bears a corresponding
share in any loss.
In Joubert v Tarry & Co 1915 TPD 277, the court stressed that sharing in the profits (and
losses) of the business is central to the notion of partnership




DISCLAIMER & TERMS OF USE
 Educational Aid: These study notes are intended to be used as educational resources and should not be seen as a
replacement for individual research, critical analysis, or professional consultation. Students are encouraged to perform
their own research and seek advice from their instructors or academic advisors for specific assignment guidelines.
 Personal Responsibility: While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information in
these study notes, the seller does not guarantee the completeness or correctness of all content. The buyer is
responsible for verifying the accuracy of the information and exercising their own judgment when applying it to their
assignments.
 Academic Integrity: It is essential for students to maintain academic integrity and follow their institution's policies
regarding plagiarism, citation, and referencing. These study notes should be used as learning tools and sources of
inspiration. Any direct reproduction of the content without proper citation and acknowledgment may be considered
academic misconduct.
 Limited Liability: The seller shall not be liable for any direct or indirect damages, losses, or consequences arising from
the use of these notes. This includes, but is not limited to, poor academic performance, penalties, or any other negative
consequences resulting from the application or misuse of the information provided.

, For additional support +27 81 278 3372

QUESTION 1 (2 ANSWERS PROVIDED)

For a valid partnership to exist in South African law, certain essentialia must be
present:

(a) at least two persons agree to act in common;
(b) each contributes something—whether money, skill, or labour;
(c) the enterprise is carried on for their joint benefit; (d) the object is the making
of profit; and
(d) the intention is that each partner shares in the net profit and bears a
corresponding share in any loss.
In Joubert v Tarry & Co 1915 TPD 277, the court stressed that sharing in the profits
(and losses) of the business is central to the notion of partnership.

In the present scenario, Zane, Bongi, Muthu, and Sophy intend to form a partnership
to buy and sell mobile phones. Bongi and Sophy contribute capital, Zane contributes
repair services, and Muthu is responsible for administration, marketing, and day-to-
day sales. Although they do carry on a business aimed at making profit for their
common enterprise, a potential problem arises regarding Muthu’s status. The
agreement explicitly states that profits are to be divided only among Bongi, Sophy,
and Zane, whereas Muthu receives a monthly salary rather than a share of net
profits.

This arrangement suggests that Muthu may not be a partner at all, but rather an
employee. In Joubert v Tarry & Co, the court indicated that a partner must at least
participate in the business’s net profit; the fact that Muthu does not share in those
profits is inconsistent with partnership. While Muthu’s services constitute a
contribution, the absence of profit participation undermines the joint-benefit
requirement.

Therefore, under the general principles set out in Joubert v Tarry & Co, only Bongi,
Sophy, and Zane effectively meet the requirements of partnership. Muthu’s fixed
remuneration places him outside the circle of co-partners, making the partnership
valid only among the other three.



OR

Connected book

Written for

Institution
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
April 4, 2025
Number of pages
7
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

$4.75
Get access to the full document:

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
Edge
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
10686
Member since
2 year
Number of followers
4256
Documents
3130
Last sold
12 hours ago

4.2

1328 reviews

5
749
4
268
3
198
2
34
1
79

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions