LLW2601
Assignment 2 Semester 1 2025
Unique Number:
Due Date: 25 April 2025
QUESTION 1
1.
The employment law consequences of Ms Goolam’s use of Generative Artificial Intelligence
(GenAI) to draft the report may constitute misconduct and breach of workplace policies,
particularly if the MTE has clear rules prohibiting the use of unapproved tools, including AI,
for work tasks.
Under South African labour law, specifically the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995,
misconduct that undermines trust in the employment relationship — such as dishonesty,
falsification of work outputs, or misrepresentation — may justify disciplinary action, up to and
including dismissal, depending on the severity of the offence and the circumstances
surrounding it.
In this case:
Ms Goolam knowingly submitted a report that included fabricated sources and content
produced by GenAI, which was misleading and deceptive
DISCLAIMER & TERMS OF USE
Educational Aid: These study notes are intended to be used as educational resources and should not be seen as a
replacement for individual research, critical analysis, or professional consultation. Students are encouraged to perform
their own research and seek advice from their instructors or academic advisors for specific assignment guidelines.
Personal Responsibility: While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information in
these study notes, the seller does not guarantee the completeness or correctness of all content. The buyer is
responsible for verifying the accuracy of the information and exercising their own judgment when applying it to their
assignments.
Academic Integrity: It is essential for students to maintain academic integrity and follow their institution's policies
regarding plagiarism, citation, and referencing. These study notes should be used as learning tools and sources of
inspiration. Any direct reproduction of the content without proper citation and acknowledgment may be considered
academic misconduct.
Limited Liability: The seller shall not be liable for any direct or indirect damages, losses, or consequences arising from
the use of these notes. This includes, but is not limited to, poor academic performance, penalties, or any other negative
consequences resulting from the application or misuse of the information provided.
, For additional support +27 81 278 3372
QUESTION 1
1.
The employment law consequences of Ms Goolam’s use of Generative Artificial
Intelligence (GenAI) to draft the report may constitute misconduct and breach of
workplace policies, particularly if the MTE has clear rules prohibiting the use of
unapproved tools, including AI, for work tasks.
Under South African labour law, specifically the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995,
misconduct that undermines trust in the employment relationship — such as
dishonesty, falsification of work outputs, or misrepresentation — may justify
disciplinary action, up to and including dismissal, depending on the severity of the
offence and the circumstances surrounding it.
In this case:
Ms Goolam knowingly submitted a report that included fabricated sources and
content produced by GenAI, which was misleading and deceptive.
This not only violated internal policies but also potentially damaged the
credibility of the Department before Parliament.
Her actions can therefore be classified as gross misconduct, especially given
her senior position and the public nature of her responsibilities.
Thus, the use of GenAI in this context — without authorisation and in violation of
policy — may be grounds for serious disciplinary action, including termination of
employment.
2.
The law that regulates working hours in South Africa is the Basic Conditions of
Employment Act 75 of 1997 (BCEA).
Specifically, Section 9(1) of the BCEA provides that the maximum normal working
time for an employee is 45 hours per week, unless the employee falls within an
exclusion.
Assignment 2 Semester 1 2025
Unique Number:
Due Date: 25 April 2025
QUESTION 1
1.
The employment law consequences of Ms Goolam’s use of Generative Artificial Intelligence
(GenAI) to draft the report may constitute misconduct and breach of workplace policies,
particularly if the MTE has clear rules prohibiting the use of unapproved tools, including AI,
for work tasks.
Under South African labour law, specifically the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995,
misconduct that undermines trust in the employment relationship — such as dishonesty,
falsification of work outputs, or misrepresentation — may justify disciplinary action, up to and
including dismissal, depending on the severity of the offence and the circumstances
surrounding it.
In this case:
Ms Goolam knowingly submitted a report that included fabricated sources and content
produced by GenAI, which was misleading and deceptive
DISCLAIMER & TERMS OF USE
Educational Aid: These study notes are intended to be used as educational resources and should not be seen as a
replacement for individual research, critical analysis, or professional consultation. Students are encouraged to perform
their own research and seek advice from their instructors or academic advisors for specific assignment guidelines.
Personal Responsibility: While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information in
these study notes, the seller does not guarantee the completeness or correctness of all content. The buyer is
responsible for verifying the accuracy of the information and exercising their own judgment when applying it to their
assignments.
Academic Integrity: It is essential for students to maintain academic integrity and follow their institution's policies
regarding plagiarism, citation, and referencing. These study notes should be used as learning tools and sources of
inspiration. Any direct reproduction of the content without proper citation and acknowledgment may be considered
academic misconduct.
Limited Liability: The seller shall not be liable for any direct or indirect damages, losses, or consequences arising from
the use of these notes. This includes, but is not limited to, poor academic performance, penalties, or any other negative
consequences resulting from the application or misuse of the information provided.
, For additional support +27 81 278 3372
QUESTION 1
1.
The employment law consequences of Ms Goolam’s use of Generative Artificial
Intelligence (GenAI) to draft the report may constitute misconduct and breach of
workplace policies, particularly if the MTE has clear rules prohibiting the use of
unapproved tools, including AI, for work tasks.
Under South African labour law, specifically the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995,
misconduct that undermines trust in the employment relationship — such as
dishonesty, falsification of work outputs, or misrepresentation — may justify
disciplinary action, up to and including dismissal, depending on the severity of the
offence and the circumstances surrounding it.
In this case:
Ms Goolam knowingly submitted a report that included fabricated sources and
content produced by GenAI, which was misleading and deceptive.
This not only violated internal policies but also potentially damaged the
credibility of the Department before Parliament.
Her actions can therefore be classified as gross misconduct, especially given
her senior position and the public nature of her responsibilities.
Thus, the use of GenAI in this context — without authorisation and in violation of
policy — may be grounds for serious disciplinary action, including termination of
employment.
2.
The law that regulates working hours in South Africa is the Basic Conditions of
Employment Act 75 of 1997 (BCEA).
Specifically, Section 9(1) of the BCEA provides that the maximum normal working
time for an employee is 45 hours per week, unless the employee falls within an
exclusion.
