LLW2601 ASSIGNMENT 1 SEM 1 2025
DISCLAIMER: THIS IS NOT AN OFFICIAL GUIDE FROM UNISA. THE REPORT IS
NOT PREPARED NOR APPROVED BY UNISA, RATHER REPRESENTS A
POSSIBLE SOLUTION TO THE TASK CONSISTENT WITH THEORY OF LLW2601.
THIS REPORT IS INTENDED TO ASSIST STUDENTS IN GETTING STARTED WITH
THEIR ASSIGNMENT, AND IN NO CASE THIS DOCUMENT SHOULD BE USED
FOR CHEATING. WE BELIEVE THIS WILL BE A GOOD STARTING POINT AS IT
WAS PREPARED BY OUR TEAM OF PROFESSIONAL PRIVATE TUTORS WHO
ARE EXPERTS IN THE FIELD, AND IT WAS PREPARED USING VARIOUS
SOURCES. ANY SIMILARITY WITH ANY EXISTING THEORY OR DISCUSSION BY
OTHER AUTHORS IS EXCUSED. THE AUTHORS HOWEVER DO NOT CLAIM
MONOPOLY TO KNOWLEDGE HENCE MODIFICATION OF THE ANSWERS
CONTAINED IN THIS FRAMEWORK MAY NOT BE PROHIBITED AS IT
CONTRIBUTES TO EXPANSION OF KNOWLEDGE. FOR ANY FURTHER
GUIDELINE ABOUT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HERE AND THE MODULE
IN GENERAL, CONTACT PASSMATE TUTORIALS.
WE ASSIST WITH OTHER MODULES INCLUDING:
ECSs, FACs, MACs, MNGs, INTs, TRLs, HMEMS, PRMs, PROs, MNBs, DSC, QMI,
MNMs, MNO, MNPs, FIN, PUBs, MNMs, RESEARCH among others.
WE OFFER CLASSES, ASSIGNMENT GUIDELINES, EXAMINATION
PREPARATION, RESEARCH AND RESEARCH PROPOSALS, DISSERTATION
EDITING etc.
OTHER THAN UNISA, WE ALSO ASSIST STUDENTS AT VARIOUS INSTITUTIONS
INCLUDING MANCOSA, REGENT, REGEYNESES, BOSTON, STADIO, OLG, UJ,
UP etc
For any enquiries the following numbers can be used for calling, sms, whatsapp and
telegram
CONTACT PASSMATE TUTORIALS @061 262 1185/068 053 8213/0717 513 144 or email
, LLW2601 ASSIGNMENT 1 SEM 1 2025
1. Mr Lampert: “Counsel, can you please explain to me what the
employment law consequence of Ms Goolam’s use of GenAI to draft
the report is? (4)
Mr. Lampert, the employment law consequence of Ms. Goolam’s use of
GenAI to draft the report is likely to be considered misconduct in the
workplace. The sources indicate the following:
❖ The Ministry of Tertiary Education (MTE) has workplace rules that
prohibit the use of unapproved tools like Generative Artificial
Intelligence (GenAI) for work-related tasks.
❖ Ms. Goolam, as a "Senior Executive Research Specialist," is
expected to conduct research and write reports for the MTE.
❖ The investigation report established that her submitted report was
partially (about 35%) generated using GenAI and contained "largely
baseless information made up by GenAI", including fictional
sources.
❖ Using GenAI in violation of the MTE's rules would constitute a
breach of a workplace rule, which is considered misconduct.
❖ Employees have an implied duty to work competently and diligently.
Submitting a report containing fabricated information generated by
AI, especially when the use of such tools is prohibited, could be seen
as a failure to fulfil this duty.
❖ An employee can be punished if they were aware, or could
reasonably be expected to have been aware, of the rule. Given Ms.
Goolam's senior position and the Minister's statement about the
prohibition of unapproved tools, it is likely she was aware of this rule.
DISCLAIMER: THIS IS NOT AN OFFICIAL GUIDE FROM UNISA. THE REPORT IS
NOT PREPARED NOR APPROVED BY UNISA, RATHER REPRESENTS A
POSSIBLE SOLUTION TO THE TASK CONSISTENT WITH THEORY OF LLW2601.
THIS REPORT IS INTENDED TO ASSIST STUDENTS IN GETTING STARTED WITH
THEIR ASSIGNMENT, AND IN NO CASE THIS DOCUMENT SHOULD BE USED
FOR CHEATING. WE BELIEVE THIS WILL BE A GOOD STARTING POINT AS IT
WAS PREPARED BY OUR TEAM OF PROFESSIONAL PRIVATE TUTORS WHO
ARE EXPERTS IN THE FIELD, AND IT WAS PREPARED USING VARIOUS
SOURCES. ANY SIMILARITY WITH ANY EXISTING THEORY OR DISCUSSION BY
OTHER AUTHORS IS EXCUSED. THE AUTHORS HOWEVER DO NOT CLAIM
MONOPOLY TO KNOWLEDGE HENCE MODIFICATION OF THE ANSWERS
CONTAINED IN THIS FRAMEWORK MAY NOT BE PROHIBITED AS IT
CONTRIBUTES TO EXPANSION OF KNOWLEDGE. FOR ANY FURTHER
GUIDELINE ABOUT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HERE AND THE MODULE
IN GENERAL, CONTACT PASSMATE TUTORIALS.
WE ASSIST WITH OTHER MODULES INCLUDING:
ECSs, FACs, MACs, MNGs, INTs, TRLs, HMEMS, PRMs, PROs, MNBs, DSC, QMI,
MNMs, MNO, MNPs, FIN, PUBs, MNMs, RESEARCH among others.
WE OFFER CLASSES, ASSIGNMENT GUIDELINES, EXAMINATION
PREPARATION, RESEARCH AND RESEARCH PROPOSALS, DISSERTATION
EDITING etc.
OTHER THAN UNISA, WE ALSO ASSIST STUDENTS AT VARIOUS INSTITUTIONS
INCLUDING MANCOSA, REGENT, REGEYNESES, BOSTON, STADIO, OLG, UJ,
UP etc
For any enquiries the following numbers can be used for calling, sms, whatsapp and
telegram
CONTACT PASSMATE TUTORIALS @061 262 1185/068 053 8213/0717 513 144 or email
, LLW2601 ASSIGNMENT 1 SEM 1 2025
1. Mr Lampert: “Counsel, can you please explain to me what the
employment law consequence of Ms Goolam’s use of GenAI to draft
the report is? (4)
Mr. Lampert, the employment law consequence of Ms. Goolam’s use of
GenAI to draft the report is likely to be considered misconduct in the
workplace. The sources indicate the following:
❖ The Ministry of Tertiary Education (MTE) has workplace rules that
prohibit the use of unapproved tools like Generative Artificial
Intelligence (GenAI) for work-related tasks.
❖ Ms. Goolam, as a "Senior Executive Research Specialist," is
expected to conduct research and write reports for the MTE.
❖ The investigation report established that her submitted report was
partially (about 35%) generated using GenAI and contained "largely
baseless information made up by GenAI", including fictional
sources.
❖ Using GenAI in violation of the MTE's rules would constitute a
breach of a workplace rule, which is considered misconduct.
❖ Employees have an implied duty to work competently and diligently.
Submitting a report containing fabricated information generated by
AI, especially when the use of such tools is prohibited, could be seen
as a failure to fulfil this duty.
❖ An employee can be punished if they were aware, or could
reasonably be expected to have been aware, of the rule. Given Ms.
Goolam's senior position and the Minister's statement about the
prohibition of unapproved tools, it is likely she was aware of this rule.
