Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

ICC GENERAL REQUIREMENTS EXAM 2 (A NEW UPDATED VERSION) COMPLETE ACTUAL EXAM QUESTIONS AND CORRECT VERIFIED ANSWERS (FULL REVISED EXAM)

Rating
4.5
(2)
Sold
-
Pages
128
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
25-04-2025
Written in
2024/2025

ICC GENERAL REQUIREMENTS EXAM 2 (A NEW UPDATED VERSION) COMPLETE ACTUAL EXAM QUESTIONS AND CORRECT VERIFIED ANSWERS (FULL REVISED EXAM)

Institution
Course

Content preview

6/18/23,r1:23rPM ExamrNovemberr2015,rquestionsrandranswers




Publicr Internationalr Lawr –r Examiner’sr Comments
2015-1997
LAWS5154rPublicrInternationalrLawr-

rSemesterrTwor2015rExamr Examiners’rFeedback

Generalr Feedback

Givenrthernaturerofrtherquestionsronrtherexam,rthererwasrconsiderablerscoperforrquestion
sr torberansweredreffectivelyrinrdifferentrways.r Thermarkingrguidesrforrtherquestionsrtheref
orer hadrtorberflexible.r Therpointsrnotedrbelowrwerernotrtheronlyronesrconsideredrwhen
r marking.r Theyrdorhoweverrindicate rthermajorrareasrthatrshouldrorrcouldrhaverbeenr co
nsideredrinransweringrtherquestions.

Asr withr mostr formsr ofr assessment,r accountrwasralsor takenr ofr ther qualityr ofrexpression.

Questionr1
Withrtherclimate-changerinducedrthawingrofrtherArcticrice-
capsrandrincreasingraccessibilityrtortherArctic,rthererhasrbeenr skyrocketingrinterestrinrwhatrisrseenrasrtherpotentialrunl
ockingrofrincrediblyrvastrnaturalrresourcesrofrtherArcticrOcean.rInr2007,r Russiarsymbolicallyrclaimedritsrstakertorbillionsr
ofrdollars’rworthrofroilrandrgasrreservesrinrtherArcticrOceanrbyrplantingrarflagronr therseabedrofrtherNorthrPole,rwhichri
trarguedrwasrarnaturalrextensionrofritsrcontinentalrshelf—
armoverwhichrwasrstrenuouslyr objectedrtorbyrarnumberrofrotherrStates.

Inr2012,rtherConventionronrtherTemporaryrSuspensionrofrExplorationrorrExploitationrofrtherNaturalrResourcesrofrtherArct
icrwasr concludedrbetweenrdulyrauthorisedrrepresentativesrofrCanada,rDenmark,rtherEuropeanrUnion,rIceland,rNorway,
rtherUnitedr KingdomrandrRussia.rTherConventionrread,rinrrelevantrpart:
Preamble:
RecognisingrtherlackrofrcertaintyraboutrterritorialrclaimsrtorcertainrStates’rcontinentalrshelvesrsaidrtorextendr
intor therArcticrOcean,
Cognisantrofrtherpotentialrforrsuchrterritorialrclaimsrtorgiversovereignrrightsrtorexploitrthernaturalrresour
cesrofr thercontinentalrshelfrtortherterritorialrState,
Acknowledgingr thatr suchr uncertaintiesr arer unlikelyr tor ber resolvedr inr ther immediater future,
Desiringr tor maintainr internationalr peacer andr security,
Resolvedr toraddressrthereffectsr ofrclimater changerinr ar concertedrandrcooperativerman
ner,r TherPartiesrhaveragreedrasrfollows:
Articler1
PartiesrtortherpresentrConventionrshallrsuspendranyrexplorationrorrexploitationractivityrrelatingrtortherna
turalr resourcesrofrtherArcticrOceanrforrtherperiodrofrfiveryears.
Articler5
AfterrtherexpiryrofrtherfiveryearrperiodrreferredrtorinrArticler1,randrafterrtherresolutionrofrterritorialr claims,r
torther extentrthatronerofrtherpartiesrhasrarvalidrclaimrtoranrextendedrcontinentalrshelfrinrtherArcticrOc
ean,rthatrStater shallrconsultrwithrtherotherrpartiesrtorthisrConventionrbeforerapprovingranyrexplorationror
rexploitationractivityrinr therArcticrOcean,rhavingrduerregardrtortherneedrtorpreservertherArcticrenvironm
ent.
Articler12
Nor partyr mayr denounce/withdrawr fromr thisr treaty.

AnrearlierrdraftrofrArticler1rhadrusedrtherlanguager“shallrsuspendranyrexplorationrorrexploitationractivityrrelatingrtoroilra
ndrgas”r butritrwasrchangedrduringrtherfinalrdraftingrstagerwithoutranyrrealrdiscussionrasrtortherreasonrforrtherchange.

InrAugustr2014,rarCanadianrsponsoredrArcticrresearchrunitrbeganrmissionsrinrtherArcticrOcean,rgatheringrdataronrthereffectr
ofrther meltingrice-
capsronrpolarrbears.rRussiarobjectedrtortherresearchrmissions,rarguingrthatrtheyrcouldrberarfrontrforroilrandrgasr explo
rationractivitiesrandrthat,rinranyrevent,rpolarrbearsrwerer“naturalrresources”randrthereforerthersuspensionrobligationrapplied
r torprohibitrscientificrmissionsrstudyingrpolarrbearsrtoo.

Canadar arguedr thatr ther Conventionr doesr notr suspendr scientificr researchr onr polarr bears.r Ther Canadianr Foreignr Ministerr state
dr atr ar pressrconferencerinrSeptemberr2014rthatr“therparties,rwhenrsigningrther2012rConvention,rneverrintendedrtorex
cluderongoingr scientificrandrecologicalrresearchrandrconservationrefforts.rWhatrwasrtargeted,rrather,rwasrtheroilrandrg
asrresourcesrinrther continentalrshelfrinrtherArcticrOcean.rCanadarisrfulfillingritsrobligationsrunderrotherrenvironmentalrtreati
esritrisr arpartyrto,rsuchrasr ther1ft73rAgreementronrtherConservationrofrPolarrBears.”

Articlesr 2r andr 7r ofr ther 1ft73r Agreementr onr ther Conservationr ofr Polarr Bearsr read:

Articler2
EachrContractingrPartyrshallrtakerappropriateractionrtorprotectrtherecosystemsrofrwhichrpolarrbearsr
arerar partr…randrshallrmanagerpolarrbearrpopulationsrinraccordancerwithrsoundrconservationrpracti
cesrbasedronr therbestravailablerscientificrdata.
Articler7
TherContractingrPartiesrshallrconductrnationalrresearchrprogrammesronrpolarrbears,rparticularlyrrese
archr relatingrtortherconservationrandrmanagementrofrtherspecies.

TherCanadianrForeignrMinisterrpointedroutrthatrallrtherotherrpartiesrtorther2012rConventionrwereralsorpartiesrtorther1
ft73r AgreementronrtherConservationrofrPolarrBears.rSherfurtherrstatedrthat:r“Whenrtherfiveryearrperiodrexpires,r ifrtherpar
tiesrauthoriser explorationrandrexploitationractivities,rgeneralrinternationalrlawrimposesranrobligationrtordoranrenvironmentalrimpa
ctrassessmentr becausertherArcticrOceanrisrarsharedrresource.rTherresearchrcollectedrbyrtherCanadianrArcticrpolarrbearrun
itrwouldrberinvaluabler forrthatrassessmentrwhichrmustrberpartrofrtherconsultationrreferredrtorinrArticler5.”




about:blank 1/128

,6/18/23,r1:23rPM ExamrNovemberr2015,rquestionsrandranswers



2


Ther Governmentr ofr Russiar hasr askedr your forr advicer onr allr ofr ther following:

(a) Howr isr itr thatr ther EUr canr ber ar partyr tor ther 2012r Conventionr whenr ther EUr isr notr ar State?

(b) Whetherrther2012rConventionrdoesrexcluderscientificrresearchrmissionsronrpolarrbearsrandrinrcomingrtortherconcl
usionr forrthatrquestion,raddress:

a. Whatr rulesr ofr internationalr lawr governr ther interpretationr ofr ther 2012r Convention?
b. Whetherr ther Canadianr Foreignr Minister’sr statementr aboutr whatr wasr intendedr atr ther timer ofr ther conclusion
ofr ther 2012r Conventionr isr relevantr torinterpretationr andr ifr so,r how?
c. Whetherrther1ft73rAgreementronrtherConservationrofrPolarrBearsrisrrelevantrtorinterpretationrandrifr so,
how?
d. Whetherrthererisr arcustomaryrobligationrtordoranrenvironmentalrimpactrassessment,rwhetherritr isr relevant
tor interpretationr andr ifr so,r how?
e. Whetherr therearlierr draftr ofr ther 2012r Conventionr isr relevantr tor interpretationr andr ifr so,r how?

(c) Whetherr Russiar canr getr outr ofr ther 2012r Convention?


Feedbackr onr Questionr 1
Averagermarkroutrofr25ronrthisrquestion:r18
Studentsransweredrthisrquestionrrelativelyrwell.rThererwasrarlotrtorcover,rbutrthererwasrscop
er forrallrstudentsrtorshowrtheirrlevelrofrknowledge.
(a) EUrpartyrtorther2012rConvention
Thisrquestionrrequiredrdiscussionrofrinternationalrorganisationsrasrsubjectsrofrinternationa
lr law.rTherReparationrcasershouldrhaverbeenrdiscussedrandrreferencershouldrhaverbeenrma
der tortherinternationalrlegalrpersonalityrofrorganisations rbeingrlimitedrbyrtheirrfunctions.
r ApplicationrtortherEUrwouldrhaverresultedrinrtherconclusionrthatrtherEUrisrarsubject rofr i
nternationalrlawrwithrlegalrpersonalityrandrtherabilityrtorenterrintortreaties.rReferencercoul
dr haverbeenrmadertortherEUrconstitutiverinstrument rreferringrtoritrhavingr“legalrpersonal
ity”r andrtorotherrtreatiesrthatrtherEUrisrarpartyrto,rsuchrasrUNCLOS.rSomerstudentsrsaidrth
atrther EUrisrarpartyrtortherECHRrbutritrisrnotryetr(butritrcouldrbecomersorinrtherfuture).rR
eferencer couldralsorhaverbeenrmadertortherVCLT’sracknowledgementrthatrotherrsubjectsr
ofr internationalrlawrthatrarernotrStatesrcanrberpartiesrtortreaties,randrtortherViennarConve
ntionr onrtherLawrofrTreatiesrBetweenrStatesrandrInternationalrOrganisationsrorrBetweenr
InternationalrOrganisationsrwhichrisrnotryetrinrforce.
ManyrstudentsrmerelyrnotedrthatrtherEUrwasranrinternational rorganisationrthatrcanrhave
r internationalrlegalrpersonalityrwithoutrexplainingrwhy.rSomerstudentsrdiscussedrwhetherrth
er EUrcouldrberar“State”rforrtherpurposerofrtherMontevideorConventionrandrthereforerber
ar partyrtorthertreatyrunderrtherVCLTrwhichrwasrarmisguidedrapproach.
(b) 2012rConventionr andr scientificr researchr missionsr onr polarr bears
Studentsrwererexpectedrtorgiverarconclusionrtortherquestionrofrwhetherrorrnotrther2012r
Conventionrexcludedrscientificrresearchrmissionsronrpolarrbearsreitherratrtherbeginningrorra
tr therconclusionrofrtheirrconsiderationrofrthersubrparas.
(i) Rulesr governingr treatyr interpretation
StudentsrneededrtoridentifyrArtsr31-
32rofrtherVCLTrasrbeingrtherstartingrpointrfromrwhichrtor considerrtreatyrinterpretation.rEa
syrmarksrcouldrbergottenrforrdiscussingrtherapplicationrofr therVCLTrtorther2012rConventi
onr(ierwhetherrther2012rConventionrmetrtherdefinitionrofrar treaty,rwhetherritrpost-
datedrtherentryrintorforcerofrtherVCLT)rbutrasritrwasrprettyrclear,rthisr wasrdiscussionrwasr
notrabsolutelyressentialrtorargoodranswer.
ThersituationrwasrcomplicatedrbyrtherfactrthatrtherEU,rarnon-
State,risrpartyrtorther2012r ConventionrandrtherVCLTronlyrappliesrtortreatiesrbetweenrStat
esr(Artr1,rArtr2(1)(a),rArtr3).r MostrstudentsridentifiedrthatrArtsr31-
32rarerreflectiverofrcustomranyway,rsorthererisrnor materialrdifferencerinrtherrulesrtorbera
pplied.rBetterrstudentsralsorcitedrArtr3(c)randr identifiedrthatrtherVCLTrwouldrapplyrasrbet
weenrtherStatesrpartiesrtorther2012rConvention,r andrthatrcustomrwouldrgovernrtherrelati
onshipr betweenrther Statesrandr therEU,rbutr thatras




about:blank 2/128

,6/18/23,r1:23rPM ExamrNovemberr2015,rquestionsrandranswers



3

theradvicerconcernsrardisputerbetweenrRussiarandrCanada,rtherVCLTrcanrberdirectlyrapplied
.r Therbetterrstudents ralsormaderexplicitrtherpresumptionrthatrallrther2012rConventionrpart
iesr wereralsorpartiesrtortherVCLT.
Mentionralsorcouldrhaverbeenrmaderofrotherrrulesrofrinternationalrlawrthatrarer“relevant”rt
or treatyrinterpretation,rsuchrasrenvironmentalrlaw,rtherlawrofrthersea,rpresumptionsrabo
utr restrictiverinterpretationsrinvolvingrsovereigntyrandrsoron.rSomerstudentsrmentionedrt
her effectivenessrprinciple,rlexrspecialisrandrlexrposterior,rbutrtheserarertechnicallyrinclude
dr withinrtherVCLTritselfrsordidrnotrneedrtorberstatedrseparately.
InrapplyingrArtr31-
32rtortherquestion,rtherbetterrstudentsridentifiedrthatrtherkeyrphraserforr interpretationris
rthermeaningrofr“naturalrresources”.rTherordinaryrmeaningrofr“naturalr resources”rshouldr
haverbeenrconsidered.rStudentsrcouldrmakerargumentsreitherrwayraboutr thermeaningrincl
udingrlivingrresourcesrorrbeingrarreferencersolelyrtorenergyrresources.rTher preambler(Artr
31(2)rVCLT)rreferencesrtorterritorialrclaims,rthercontinentalrshelf,randr explorationrandrex
ploitationrcouldrgivercontextrtor“naturalrresources”rtorsupportrther conclusionrthatritrdoes
rnotrincluderpolarrbears.rThisrcouldrbersupportedrbyrtherpreambularr referencertorclimater
change.rOnrtherotherrhand,rtherShrimprTurtlercase,rwhichrheldrspeciesr ofrsearturtlesrtorbe
r“naturalrresources”rmightrsupportrtherconclusionrthatr“naturalrresources”r does rincluderpol
arrbears.rSomerstudentsropinedrthatrNorwayrandrIcelandrarereconomicallyr dependentronr
fisheries,rincludingrinrtherArctic,randrthatritrwouldrberunlikelyrthatrtheyrwouldr foregorexplo
itationrofrfisheryrresourcesrforrfiveryearsrunderrtherConvention.rTherdraftrtorArtr1r couldrberd
iscussedrherer(Artr32rVCLT)rorrinrsectionr(v)rbelow.rItrcouldrberreliedruponrtorarguer eitherr
way.rTherchangerfromr“oilrandrgas”rtor“naturalrresources”rcouldrhaverindicatedranr intent
ionrtorbroadenrtherscoperofrwhatrwasrcovered.rHowever,rtherlackrofrdiscussionr attending
rtherchangermightrhaverindicatedrthat rnorsubstantiverchangerinrmeaningrwasr intended,ro
rrthatrtherissuerwasrnotrconsciouslyrbeingrconsideredratrthertimerofrtherchange.
(ii) Canadianr FM’srstatement
Therbestranswerrtorthisrquestionrwasrthatrtherstatementrwasrnotrrelevant.rItrdoesrnotrfall
r withinrArtr31rorr32rVCLT.rItrwasrarstatementrgivenrbyronerpartyrsubsequentrtortherconclusi
onr ofrthertreaty.rTherICJrinrQatarrvrBahrainrindicatedrthatrsuchrstatementsrwererirreleva
ntrtor interpretation.
Marksrwerergivenrtorstudentsrwhordiscussedrwhyrthisrstatementrwasrnotranrinterpretativ
er declarationrorrarreservation.
MarksrwerergivenrtorstudentsrwhordiscussedrthatrtherstatementrdidrnotrfallrintorArtr31(2)ra
sr itrwasrnotranragreementrorrinstrumentrmaderinrconnectionrwithrtherconclusionrofrthertre
aty.r Marksrwerergivenrtorstudentsrwhordiscussedrthatrthisrstatementrwasrnotrarsubseque
ntr agreementrorrsubsequent rpracticerunderrArtr31(3)(a)rorr(b)rbecauseritrwasrnotrsharedr
byrallr therpartiesrevidencingrarcollectiverinterpretation.rMarksrwerergivenrtorstudentsrwh
or discussedrwhetherritrcouldrgortowardsrestablishingrsubsequentrpracticerunderrArtr31(3)(
b)rifr itrwerersharedrbyrallrotherrpartiesrwho,rforrexample,rmightrhavertheirrownrscientificr
andr environmental rresearchrunitsroperatingrinrtherArctic,rbutrstudentsrhadrtorclearlyrgive
rar reasonrhowritrcouldrbersubsequentrpracticerinrlightrofrtherlimitedrfactsrabout rtherviewsro
frther otherrparties.
Arcommonrmistakerwasrtortreatritrasrsupplementaryrorrpreparatoryrmeansrforrinterpretatio
nr underrArtr32.rPreparatoryrworksr/rthertravauxr/rcircumstancesrofrconclusionrarerlimited
rtor therrecords,rstatementsrandreventsrduringrtherdraftingrandrconclusionrofrthertreaty.rT
hisr statementrwasrgivenrtworyearsrlaterrandrbyronerpartyronly.rTherermightrhaverbeenra
nr argumentrthatrtherreferencertor“supplementaryrmeans”rinrArtr32risrbroaderrthanrjustrt
her preparatoryrmaterial,rbutrstudentsrwouldrhavertormakerthisrcontroversialrargumentrexpli
citlyr andrdefendrwhyrtherviewrofrarsinglerpartyrwouldrberrelevantrtordeterminingrtherinten
tionrofr allrtherparties.rNorstudentrdidrthis.
(iii) 1973rConventionr onr Polarr Bears




about:blank 3/128

, 6/18/23,r1:23rPM ExamrNovemberr2015,rquestionsrandranswers



4

Ther1ft73rConventionrisrrelevantrtorinterpretationrthroughrArtr31(3)(c)rVCLTrasrrelevantrrule
sr ofrinternationalrlawrapplicablerbetweenrallrtherparties.
StudentsrshouldralsorhaverconsideredrArtr30rregardingrsuccessivertreatiesrrelatingrtorther
samersubjectrmatter.rStudentsrshouldrhaverconsideredrwhetherrthertreatiesrrelatedrtorthe
r samersubject rmatter.rThisrwouldrinrpartrberdependentronrwhetherr“naturalrresources”r i
ncludesrpolarrbearsrorrnot.rIfritrdidrArtr30(3)rprovides rthatrther1ft73rConventionrwouldrappl
yr tortherextentrthatritsrprovisionsrarercompatiblerwithrther2012rConvention.rStudentsrsho
uldr haverconsideredrwhetherritrisrpossiblertor construerthemrconsistentlyrandrwhetherrArt
r31(3)
(c) VCLTrrequiresrthis,rinrwhichrcaserthererwillrbernorconflict.rReferencercouldrhaverbeenr
madertortherpreamblertorther2012rConventionrandrprovisionsrofrther1ft73rConventionrto
r demonstraterhowrtheyrcanrberinterpretedrconsistently.rTherrelevancertortherinterpretationr
ofr “naturalrresource”rshouldrhaverbeenrdiscussed.
(iv) EIA
Studentsrwererexpectedrtortakerarpositionronrwhetherrthererisrarcustomaryrobligationrtord
or anrenvironmentalrimpactrassessment.rPulprMillsrshouldrhaverbeenridentifiedrasrauthority
rforr thercustomaryrobligation.rBetterrstudentsrexplainedrwhenrtherobligationrappliesr(thre
sholdr ofrharm)randrexplainedrthatrPulprMillsrconcernedrtransboundaryrharmrtoranotherrS
tate’sr environment, rbutrthatrtherITLOSrDeeprSeabedrAdvisoryrOpinionrextendedrthisrtorsh
aredr resourcesrbeyondranyrState’srjurisdiction.rTherobservationrshouldrhaverbeenrmadert
hatrther ArcticrOceanrisrarsharedrresourcerbeyondranyrState’srjurisdiction.rThisr customaryrobl
igationrisr relevantrtorinterpretationrofrtherobligationrinrArtr5rthroughrArtr31(3)(c)rVCLT.
SomerstudentsrdiscussedrtherobligationrtorpreventrtransboundaryrharmrtorotherrStatesr(Trail
r Smelter)randrtherPrecautionaryrPrinciple rwhichrwerernotrdirectlyrrelevant rhere.

(v) DraftrArtr1rofrther2012rConvention
TherdraftrwasrrelevantrtorinterpretationrthroughrArtr32rVCLTrasrpreparatoryrworks.rSeer d
iscussionraboverinr(i).rArcommonrerrorrwasrtorassumerthatrArtr32rmaterialrcouldronlyrber l
ookedratrwhenrthermeaningrisrambiguousrorrabsurd,rbutritrcanrberlookedrtorinrorderrtor c
onfirmrthermeaningrgivenrbyrtherapplicationrofrArtr31.
(c)rRussiargettingroutrofrther2012rConvention
StudentsrwererexpectedrtordiscussrtherapplicationrofrPartrVrofrtherVCLT.r Artr42rspecifies rth
atr thertreatyrcanronlyrberavoidedrbyrwayrofrtherprovisionsrinrPartrV.rArtr54rVCLTrprovides
rthatr Russiarcouldrterminaterorrwithdrawrinraccordance rwithrthertreaty’srprovisionsrorrbyrc
onsentr ofrallrtherparties.rArtr12rofrther2012rConventionrprohibitsrdenunciationrorrwithdr
awal,randr consent risrunlikelyronrtherfacts.rStudentsrshouldrthenrhaverconsideredrwhether
rthererwerer anyrgroundsrforrinvalidityrorrforrterminationrunderrPart rV.r Errorr(Artr48) rsho
uldrhaverbeenr consideredrinsofarrasrRussiarmightrseekrtorarguerthatritsrconsentrwasrcond
itionalruponritsr understandingrofrnaturalrresourcesrasrincludingrlivingrresources.rStudents
rshouldrhaver discussedrtherconditions rforrerrorrinrArtr48randritsrlikelyrsuccess.r Material rbr
eachr(Artr60)rbyr Canadarwouldrberrelevantrtorconsiderrifrtherconclusionrinr(b)rwasrthatr“n
aturalrresources”r doesrincluderlivingrresourcesrandrthereforerarscientificrresearchrmission
ronrpolarrbearsrisr prohibited.rTherconditionsrforrArtr60rshouldrhaverbeenrconsidered.rProc
eduralrrequirementsr couldrhaverbeenrmentioned.
ArcommonrmistakerwasrtorconsiderrtherapplicationrofrArtr56,rwhichrdoesrnotrapplyrhere.rAr
tr 56rappliesronlyrwhererthererisrnorprovisionrinrthertreatyronrtermination,rdenunciationro
rr withdrawal.rInrther2012rConvention,rArtr12risranrexplicitrprovisionronrdenunciationrand
r withdrawal.




about:blank 4/128

Connected book

Written for

Course

Document information

Uploaded on
April 25, 2025
Number of pages
128
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

$21.49
Get access to the full document:

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF


Also available in package deal

Reviews from verified buyers

Showing all 2 reviews
8 months ago

11 months ago

4.5

2 reviews

5
1
4
1
3
0
2
0
1
0
Trustworthy reviews on Stuvia

All reviews are made by real Stuvia users after verified purchases.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
JOHNNKABIRU Teachme2-tutor
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
17
Member since
1 year
Number of followers
7
Documents
798
Last sold
2 weeks ago

4.8

832 reviews

5
687
4
97
3
39
2
6
1
3

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions