REFLECTION ON :
When it comes to globalization, the interconnectivity of state politics on
cultural , religious , economical , social and geographical grounds as stunned
the world with it’s prejudice act on , economical , cultural and social
fragmentation for the prevalence of peace via soft- power. As globalization is
a mean of interdependence & integration of one independent entity( state,
people , culture & custom ) with another. International community agrees to
the clause that globalization is a mean of Structural & Cultural division of
power politics among state, influencing balance of power over each other to
ensure political , social , cultural & economical peace and prosperity.
In order to understand the global politics under the pre-text of peace &
globalization. It is important to undermine the question that why
globalization tends to fails in the unification of peace ? In comparison to why
globalization tends to create a structural and cultural barriers in maintaining
peace?
Peace is defined as the absence of violence ,under the closure ,& promotion
of unity , interdependency , & global acceptance to diversity without
remedial conflict or dispute. But if we study the above statement of peace
with the reality of world politics, it adheres to the fact that globalization is
not an ideal of peace but rather a influence of powered utility of soft violence
played by state actors to influence the lesser actors of global franchise . And
I was convinced with this ideal by reading the article “ structural & cultural
globalization: A threat of positive and sustainable peace.” The author has
clearly stage the notion of structural violence with the idealism of Gultung
Theory of peace and conflict , in relation with structural violence &
globalization.
Upon analysis, the article purposed the idea of globalization being the cause
of division of structural and cultural diversity and threat to peace . In regard
to state practices that are deemed as a global acceptance or prevalence
peace but are coincided with national interest , spread of economical
dependency & supremacy of cultural monopoly.
The author implemented that war was aggravated with peace in the ancient
times because it ensured prominence for both the state and the general
masses. Which is generally true in my regards as well . In medieval times or
the times of clashes between Athens and Sparta , peace was sustained by
the strong Via vanquishing the weak opponent in battles. In a typical hard
power succession for the glory of land , wealth prestige and power
When it comes to globalization, the interconnectivity of state politics on
cultural , religious , economical , social and geographical grounds as stunned
the world with it’s prejudice act on , economical , cultural and social
fragmentation for the prevalence of peace via soft- power. As globalization is
a mean of interdependence & integration of one independent entity( state,
people , culture & custom ) with another. International community agrees to
the clause that globalization is a mean of Structural & Cultural division of
power politics among state, influencing balance of power over each other to
ensure political , social , cultural & economical peace and prosperity.
In order to understand the global politics under the pre-text of peace &
globalization. It is important to undermine the question that why
globalization tends to fails in the unification of peace ? In comparison to why
globalization tends to create a structural and cultural barriers in maintaining
peace?
Peace is defined as the absence of violence ,under the closure ,& promotion
of unity , interdependency , & global acceptance to diversity without
remedial conflict or dispute. But if we study the above statement of peace
with the reality of world politics, it adheres to the fact that globalization is
not an ideal of peace but rather a influence of powered utility of soft violence
played by state actors to influence the lesser actors of global franchise . And
I was convinced with this ideal by reading the article “ structural & cultural
globalization: A threat of positive and sustainable peace.” The author has
clearly stage the notion of structural violence with the idealism of Gultung
Theory of peace and conflict , in relation with structural violence &
globalization.
Upon analysis, the article purposed the idea of globalization being the cause
of division of structural and cultural diversity and threat to peace . In regard
to state practices that are deemed as a global acceptance or prevalence
peace but are coincided with national interest , spread of economical
dependency & supremacy of cultural monopoly.
The author implemented that war was aggravated with peace in the ancient
times because it ensured prominence for both the state and the general
masses. Which is generally true in my regards as well . In medieval times or
the times of clashes between Athens and Sparta , peace was sustained by
the strong Via vanquishing the weak opponent in battles. In a typical hard
power succession for the glory of land , wealth prestige and power
