1|Page
CONTRACTING OFFICER WARRANT BOARD EXAM
2025 CURRENTLY TESTING FINAL EXAM AND
PRACTICE EXAM QUESTIONS COMPLETE EXAM
QUESTIONS WITH DETAILED VERIFIED ANSWERS
/ALREADY GRADED A+/ LATEST VERSION!!!
You are the PCO for a major competitive negotiated
source selection. The RFP, which reflects the user's
requirements and is based on the user's budget, has a
requirement for 220 cargo loaders to be delivered at 55
per year over the next four years. One offeror proposes to
deliver all 220 loaders in the first year at a dramatically
reduced price. Can you accept the offeror's proposal?
What factors should you consider in your decision? -
Answer-You can accept the offeror's proposal under
certain circumstances. Firstly, what did the RFP say about
alternate proposals? Is this a situation where requirements
are changed and the other offerors should be allowed to
propose on the basis of the changed requirements? You
need to ask the user if he wants all 220 in the first year
and are the operating locations physically able to
accommodate their loaders in the first year. Finally, the
offeror could be taken into discussions and asked to
conform to the RFP with there being the possibility of not
being selected for award or elimination from the
,2|Page
competitive range if the proposal is not made compliant
with the RFP.
You are the PCO on a new $2B aircraft development
program. The program is in contract negotiations for a
Fixed Price Incentive (Firm Target) System Development
and Demonstration contract award to a sole source
contractor. The program director, a fast-burning young
colonel, e-mails you that she is very concerned with the
aircraft's ultimate speed at the full specification payload.
She would like the contractor to achieve the faster, desired
objective speed rather than the mandatory threshold
speed, and thinks that an objective performance incentive
would be the way to go to achieve her goal. You are asked
to go to her office and discuss the matter and the issues
involved in using such an incentive. What do you tell the
colonel? - Answer-There are a number of considerations
for the colonel:
The desired additional speed should provide benefit to the
Government in order to justify the expenditure of funds to
achieve it. The colonel should be able to articulate the
justification.
The situation is very amenable to a classic performance
incentive that would allow the contractor to earn profit for
achieving the desired speed above and beyond what the
,3|Page
final FPIF profit would be for achieving threshold speed. If
the contractor perceives this can't happen, he will either
not sign up to the incentive or will ignore it from Day One.
The incentive and resulting payment have to be structured
so as to be based on observable, measurable results that
would determine how much is earned by the contractor.
Subjectivity is not allowable under current AF policy
without HCA approval.
We have to be very careful to understand what possible
unintended consequences could be caused by the
existence of this feature in the contract. For example, will
the contractor reduce aircraft weight beyond safe limits in
order to help achieve the payment? Also, will the
contractor consume excessive schedule to get the extra
speed?
There has to be a cost incentive in place so that the
contractor doesn't spend an unconstrained amount of
money to win the payment, such as under a CPFF
contract. The FPIF share line serves this purpose when
balanced against the incentive.
The incentive has to be balanced with the FPIF share line
so that the contractor doesn't spend more money to
achieve the desired speed than he has potential to earn by
receiving the payment. Similarly, the contractor can't be
, 4|Page
allowed to spend an excessive amount of money with little
cost penalty to achieve success.
In some cases, Contracting Officers are also Grants
Officers. They can award Grants and Assistance
Instruments as well as contracts. What is Assistance?
How does it differ from Acquisition? What gives the Grants
Officers their authority to enter into assistance? What are
the types of Assistance? - Answer-When the principal
purpose is to transfer a thing of value, to carry out a public
purpose of support or stimulation authorized by law of the
United States, it is Assistance.
Acquisition, by contrast, has the principal purpose of
acquiring property or services for the direct benefit or use
of the United States Government.
Federal agencies must be authorized by statute to support
or stimulate a public purpose. The statutory authority from
Congress must exist either in broad legislation or in a
program-specific statute. Absent that statutory authority, a
Grants Officer may not use an assistance instrument.
Authorities to issue Assistance can be of three types: (1)
Provide to the Secretary of Defense by statute, e.g., 10
U.S.C. 2391; (2) Authority provided to DoD components
that requires no delegation by the Secretary of Defense,
e.g., 10 U.S.C. 2358; (3) Authority coming indirectly from
CONTRACTING OFFICER WARRANT BOARD EXAM
2025 CURRENTLY TESTING FINAL EXAM AND
PRACTICE EXAM QUESTIONS COMPLETE EXAM
QUESTIONS WITH DETAILED VERIFIED ANSWERS
/ALREADY GRADED A+/ LATEST VERSION!!!
You are the PCO for a major competitive negotiated
source selection. The RFP, which reflects the user's
requirements and is based on the user's budget, has a
requirement for 220 cargo loaders to be delivered at 55
per year over the next four years. One offeror proposes to
deliver all 220 loaders in the first year at a dramatically
reduced price. Can you accept the offeror's proposal?
What factors should you consider in your decision? -
Answer-You can accept the offeror's proposal under
certain circumstances. Firstly, what did the RFP say about
alternate proposals? Is this a situation where requirements
are changed and the other offerors should be allowed to
propose on the basis of the changed requirements? You
need to ask the user if he wants all 220 in the first year
and are the operating locations physically able to
accommodate their loaders in the first year. Finally, the
offeror could be taken into discussions and asked to
conform to the RFP with there being the possibility of not
being selected for award or elimination from the
,2|Page
competitive range if the proposal is not made compliant
with the RFP.
You are the PCO on a new $2B aircraft development
program. The program is in contract negotiations for a
Fixed Price Incentive (Firm Target) System Development
and Demonstration contract award to a sole source
contractor. The program director, a fast-burning young
colonel, e-mails you that she is very concerned with the
aircraft's ultimate speed at the full specification payload.
She would like the contractor to achieve the faster, desired
objective speed rather than the mandatory threshold
speed, and thinks that an objective performance incentive
would be the way to go to achieve her goal. You are asked
to go to her office and discuss the matter and the issues
involved in using such an incentive. What do you tell the
colonel? - Answer-There are a number of considerations
for the colonel:
The desired additional speed should provide benefit to the
Government in order to justify the expenditure of funds to
achieve it. The colonel should be able to articulate the
justification.
The situation is very amenable to a classic performance
incentive that would allow the contractor to earn profit for
achieving the desired speed above and beyond what the
,3|Page
final FPIF profit would be for achieving threshold speed. If
the contractor perceives this can't happen, he will either
not sign up to the incentive or will ignore it from Day One.
The incentive and resulting payment have to be structured
so as to be based on observable, measurable results that
would determine how much is earned by the contractor.
Subjectivity is not allowable under current AF policy
without HCA approval.
We have to be very careful to understand what possible
unintended consequences could be caused by the
existence of this feature in the contract. For example, will
the contractor reduce aircraft weight beyond safe limits in
order to help achieve the payment? Also, will the
contractor consume excessive schedule to get the extra
speed?
There has to be a cost incentive in place so that the
contractor doesn't spend an unconstrained amount of
money to win the payment, such as under a CPFF
contract. The FPIF share line serves this purpose when
balanced against the incentive.
The incentive has to be balanced with the FPIF share line
so that the contractor doesn't spend more money to
achieve the desired speed than he has potential to earn by
receiving the payment. Similarly, the contractor can't be
, 4|Page
allowed to spend an excessive amount of money with little
cost penalty to achieve success.
In some cases, Contracting Officers are also Grants
Officers. They can award Grants and Assistance
Instruments as well as contracts. What is Assistance?
How does it differ from Acquisition? What gives the Grants
Officers their authority to enter into assistance? What are
the types of Assistance? - Answer-When the principal
purpose is to transfer a thing of value, to carry out a public
purpose of support or stimulation authorized by law of the
United States, it is Assistance.
Acquisition, by contrast, has the principal purpose of
acquiring property or services for the direct benefit or use
of the United States Government.
Federal agencies must be authorized by statute to support
or stimulate a public purpose. The statutory authority from
Congress must exist either in broad legislation or in a
program-specific statute. Absent that statutory authority, a
Grants Officer may not use an assistance instrument.
Authorities to issue Assistance can be of three types: (1)
Provide to the Secretary of Defense by statute, e.g., 10
U.S.C. 2391; (2) Authority provided to DoD components
that requires no delegation by the Secretary of Defense,
e.g., 10 U.S.C. 2358; (3) Authority coming indirectly from
