Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

MATH 225 WEEK 8 FINAL EXAM (4 VERSIONS)/ MATH 225N WEEK 8 FINAL EXAM / MATH225 WEEK 8 FINAL EXAM (LATEST, 2020): CHAMBERLAIN COLLEGE OF NURSING |100% CORRECT ANSWERS, DOWNLOAD TO SCORE A|

Beoordeling
3.0
(3)
Verkocht
13
Pagina's
155
Geüpload op
05-09-2020
Geschreven in
2020/2021

MATH 225 Week 8 Final Exam Question and Answers (4 Latest Versions): Statistical reasoning for health sciences : Chamberlain College of Nursing MATH225N Week 8 Final Exam Question and Answers (4 Latest Versions): Statistical reasoning for health sciences : Chamberlain College of Nursing

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Vak

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

MATH225 WEEK 8 FINAL
Question
The table shows data collected on the relationship between the time spent studying per day
and the time spent reading per day. The line of best fit for the data is yˆ=0.16x+36.2.
Assume the line of best fit is significant and there is a strong linear relationship between
the variables.

Studying (Minutes) 507090110 Reading (Minutes) 44485054

(a) According to the line of best fit, what would be the predicted number of minutes spent
reading for someone who spent 67 minutes studying? Round your answer to two decimal
places.


Perfect. Your hard work is paying off 😀


The predicted number of minutes spent reading is 46 point 9 2$$46.9246 point 9 2 -

correct.
response - correct

Answer Explanation

The predicted number of minutes spent reading is 1$$1 - no response given.
Correct answers:
• 146 point 9 2$46.92$46.92


Substitute 67 for x into the line of best fit to estimate the number of minutes spent reading
for someone who spent 67 minutes studying: yˆ=0.16(67)+36.2=46.92.

Question
The table shows data collected on the relationship between the time spent studying per day
and the time spent reading per day. The line of best fit for the data is yˆ=0.16x+36.2.

, Studying (Minutes) 507090110 Reading (Minutes) 44485054

(a) According to the line of best fit, the predicted number of minutes spent reading for
someone who spent 67 minutes studying is 46.92.




(b) Is it reasonable to use this line of best fit to make the above prediction?


Great work! That's correct.


The estimate, a predicted time of 46.92 minutes, is both reliable and reasonable.

The estimate, a predicted time of 46.92 minutes, is both unreliable and unreasonable.

The estimate, a predicted time of 46.92 minutes, is reliable but unreasonable.

The estimate, a predicted time of 46.92 minutes, is unreliable but reasonable.
Answer Explanation
Correct answer:
The estimate, a predicted time of 46.92 minutes, is both reliable and reasonable.

The data in the table only includes studying times between 50 and 110 minutes, so the
line of best fit gives reliable and reasonable predictions for values of x between 50 and
110. Since 67 is between these values, the estimate is both reliable and reasonable.

Question
Michelle is studying the relationship between the hours worked (per week) and time spent
reading (per day) and has collected the data shown in the table. The line of best fit for the
data is yˆ=−0.79x+98.8. Assume the line of best fit is significant and there is a strong
linear relationship between the variables.

Hours Worked (per week) 30405060 Minutes Reading (per
day) 75685852

, (a) According to the line of best fit, what would be the predicted number of minutes spent
reading for a person who works 27 hours (per week)? Round your answer to two decimal
places, as needed.


Yes that's right. Keep it up!


The predicted number of minutes spent reading is 77 point 4 7$$77.4777 point 4 7 -

correct.
response - correct

Answer Explanation

The predicted number of minutes spent reading is 1$$1 - no response given.
Correct answers:
• 177 point 4 7$77.47$77.47


Substitute 27 for x into the line of best fit to estimate the number of minutes spent reading
for a person who works 27 hours (per week): yˆ=−0.79(27)+98.8=77.47.



Question
Michelle is studying the relationship between the hours worked (per week) and time spent
reading (per day) and has collected the data shown in the table. The line of best fit for the
data is yˆ=−0.79x+98.8.

Hours Worked (per week) 30405060 Minutes Reading (per
day) 75685852

(a) According to the line of best fit, the predicted number of minutes spent reading for a
person who works 27 hours (per week) is 77.47.




(b) Is it reasonable to use this line of best fit to make the above prediction?

, Yes that's right. Keep it up!


The estimate, a predicted time of 77.47 minutes, is unreliable but reasonable.

The estimate, a predicted time of 77.47 minutes, is reliable but unreasonable.

The estimate, a predicted time of 77.47 minutes, is both unreliable and unreasonable.

The estimate, a predicted time of 77.47 minutes, is both reliable and reasonable.
Answer Explanation
Correct answer:
The estimate, a predicted time of 77.47 minutes, is unreliable but reasonable.

The data in the table only includes the time worked between 30 and 60 hours, so the line
of best fit gives reliable and reasonable predictions for values of x between 30 and 60.
Since 27 is not between these values, the estimate is not reliable. However, 77.47
minutes is a reasonable time.


Question
A medical experiment on tumor growth gives the following data table.




x y
57 38
61 50
63 76
68 97
72 113

Geschreven voor

Instelling
Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
5 september 2020
Bestand laatst geupdate op
5 september 2020
Aantal pagina's
155
Geschreven in
2020/2021
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

$35.99
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:
Gekocht door 13 studenten

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Beoordelingen van geverifieerde kopers

Alle 3 reviews worden weergegeven
4 jaar geleden

5 jaar geleden

5 jaar geleden

3.0

3 beoordelingen

5
1
4
0
3
1
2
0
1
1
Betrouwbare reviews op Stuvia

Alle beoordelingen zijn geschreven door echte Stuvia-gebruikers na geverifieerde aankopen.

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
NURSINGEXPERT WALDEN UNIVERSITY
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
1222
Lid sinds
5 jaar
Aantal volgers
1024
Documenten
1091
Laatst verkocht
2 maanden geleden

4.4

481 beoordelingen

5
373
4
41
3
11
2
13
1
43

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen