for £5,000. The contract specifies that the car is to be delivered
in two weeks. However, a day before the agreed delivery date,
Liam tells Natasha that he will not be delivering the car, as he
has decided to sell it to someone else instead.
Natasha wants to know if she has a claim for anticipatory breach
of contract.
Liam may have committed an anticipatory breach of contract, and
Natasha may have a claim for breach of contract as a result.
Anticipatory breach occurs when one party indicates, before the
performance is due, that they will not fulfill their obligations under the
contract. This can happen through a clear statement or conduct that
shows the party will not perform. The non-breaching party is then entitled
to terminate the contract and seek remedies right away.
First, there must be a clear indication that one party will not
perform their obligations under the contract (Alder v Moore). In this
case, Liam informed Natasha the day before the agreed delivery date that
he would not be delivering the car, stating that he had decided to sell it to
someone else instead. This is a clear statement that Liam will not fulfill his
contractual obligation, which constitutes anticipatory breach.
Next, the non-breaching party can treat the contract as
terminated immediately upon receiving notice of the anticipatory
breach (Hochster v De La Tour). In this scenario, Natasha does not need
to wait until the agreed delivery date to act. Upon hearing Liam’s refusal
to perform, Natasha can choose to treat the contract as terminated and
immediately seek remedies, such as claiming damages for the loss she
suffered from not receiving the car.
Additionally, anticipatory breach allows the non-breaching party to
claim damages even before performance is due (Hochster v De La
Tour). Natasha can claim damages for any financial losses resulting from
Liam's refusal to deliver the car. This includes losses from not receiving
the car on time, and possibly from having to purchase a replacement
vehicle at a higher price.