Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

Test Bank - Pharmacology for the Primary Care Provider, 4th Edition (Edmunds, 2014), Chapter 1-73 | All Chapters

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
273
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
10-06-2025
Geschreven in
2024/2025

Test Bank - Pharmacology for the Primary Care Provider, 4th Edition (Edmunds, 2014), Chapter 1-73 | All ChaptersTest Bank - Pharmacology for the Primary Care Provider, 4th Edition (Edmunds, 2014), Chapter 1-73 | All ChaptersTest Bank - Pharmacology for the Primary Care Provider, 4th Edition (Edmunds, 2014), Chapter 1-73 | All ChaptersTest Bank - Pharmacology for the Primary Care Provider, 4th Edition (Edmunds, 2014), Chapter 1-73 | All ChaptersTest Bank - Pharmacology for the Primary Care Provider, 4th Edition (Edmunds, 2014), Chapter 1-73 | All ChaptersTest Bank - Pharmacology for the Primary Care Provider, 4th Edition (Edmunds, 2014), Chapter 1-73 | All ChaptersTest Bank - Pharmacology for the Primary Care Provider, 4th Edition (Edmunds, 2014), Chapter 1-73 | All Chapters

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
PHARMACOLOGY FOR PRIMARY PROVIDER 4T
Vak
PHARMACOLOGY FOR PRIMARY PROVIDER 4T

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

TEST BANK FOR
n n




PHARMACOLOGY
n




FOR PRIMARY
n n




PROVIDER 4TH
n n




EDITION
n




EDMUNDS
n

,Chapter 01: Prescriptive Authority and Role Implementation: Tradition vs.
n n n n n n n n


Change Test Bank
n n n




MULTIPLE nCHOICE

1. Which nof nthe nfollowing nhas ninfluenced nan nemphasis non nprimary ncare
neducation nin nmedical n schools?
a. Changes nin nMedicare
nreimbursement n methods

nrecommended nin n1992
b. Competition nfrom nnonphysicians
ndesiring n to nmeet nprimary ncare
nshortages
c. The nneed nfor nmonopolistic ncontrol
nin nthe n marketplace nof nprimary
noutpatient ncare
d. The nrecognition nthat nnonphysicians
nhave n variable nsuccess nproviding
nprimary ncare
ANS: n A
The nPhysician nPayment nReview nCommission nin n1992 ndirectly nincreased
nfinancial n reimbursement nto nclinicians nwho nprovide nprimary ncare. nCoupled

nwith na nshortage nof n primary ncare nproviders, nthis nincentive nled nmedical


nschools nto nplace ngreater nemphasis non n preparing nprimary ncare nphysicians.

nCompetition nfrom nnonphysicians nincreased n coincidentally nas nprofessionals

nfrom nother ndisciplines nstepped nup nto nmeet nthe nneeds.

Nonphysicians nhave nhad nincreasing nsuccess nat nproviding nprimary ncare nand
nhave nbeen n shown nto nbe nsafe nand neffective.




DIF: Cognitive nLevel: nRemembering n(Knowledge) REF: n n2

2. Which nof nthe nfollowing nstatements nis ntrue nabout nthe nprescribing npractices nof
nphysicians?
a. Older nphysicians ntend nto nprescribe
nmore n appropriate nmedications

nthan nyounger n physicians.


b. Antibiotic nmedications nremain nin
nthe ntop n five nclassifications nof

nmedications n prescribed.


c. Most nphysicians nrely non na
n“therapeutic n armamentarium” nthat

nconsists nof nless nthan n 100 ndrug

npreparations nper nphysician.
d. The ndominant nform nof ndrug
ninformation n used nby nprimary ncare


nphysicians ncontinues n to nbe nthat

nprovided nby npharmaceutical

n companies.
ANS: n D
Even nthough nmost nphysicians nclaim nto nplace nlittle nweight non ndrug nadvertisements,

,1

, pharmaceutical nrepresentatives, nand npatient npreference nand nstate nthat nthey
nrely non n academic nsources nfor ndrug ninformation, na nstudy nshowed nthat

ncommercial nrather nthan n scientific nsources nof ndrug ninformation ndominated


ntheir ndrug ninformation nmaterials. n Younger nphysicians ntend nto nprescribe

nfewer nand nmore nappropriate ndrugs. nAntibiotics nhave n dropped nout nof nthe ntop

nfive nclassifications nof ndrugs nprescribed. nMost nphysicians nhave na n therapeutic

narmamentarium nof nabout n144 ndrugs.




DIF: Cognitive nLevel: nRemembering n(Knowledge) REF: n n3

3. As nprimary ncare nnurse npractitioners n(NPs) ncontinue nto ndevelop ntheir nrole nas
nprescribers nof n medications, nit nwill nbe nimportant nto:
a. attain nthe nsame nlevel nof
nexpertise nas n physicians n who

n currently n prescribe

n medications.
b. learn nfrom nthe nexperiences nof
nphysicians n and ndevelop nexpertise

nbased non nevidence- n based npractice.


c. maintain ncollaborative nand
nsupervisorial n relationships nwith

nphysicians nwho nwill n oversee

nprescribing npractices.
d. develop nrelationships nwith
npharmaceutical n representatives nto


nlearn nabout nnew n medications nas

nthey nare ndeveloped.
ANS: n B
As nnonphysicians ndevelop nthe nroles nassociated nwith nprescriptive nauthority, nit
nwill nbe n important nto nlearn nfrom nthe npast nexperiences nof nphysicians nand nto

ndevelop nprescribing n practices nbased non nevidence-based nmedicine. nIt nis

nhoped nthat nall nprescribers, nincluding n physicians nand nnurse npractitioners,

nwill nstrive nto ndo nbetter nthan nin nthe npast. nNPs nshould n work ntoward

nprescriptive nauthority nand nfor npractice nthat nis nnot nsupervised nby nanother

n professional. nPharmaceutical nrepresentatives nprovide ninformation nthat ncarries


nsome nbias. n Academic nsources nare nbetter.




DIF: Cognitive nLevel: nApplying n(Application) REF: n n4

Chapter 02: Historical Review of Prescriptive Authority: The Role of Nurses
n n n n n n n n n n


(NPs, CNMs, CRNAs, and CNSs) and Physician Assistants
n n n n n n n n


Test Bank
n




MULTIPLE nCHOICE

1. A nprimary ncare nNP nwill nbegin npracticing nin na nstate nin nwhich nthe ngovernor nhas
nopted nout nof n the nfederal nfacility nreimbursement nrequirement. nThe nNP
nshould nbe naware nthat nthis ndefines n how nNPs nmay nwrite nprescriptions:

Gekoppeld boek

Geschreven voor

Instelling
PHARMACOLOGY FOR PRIMARY PROVIDER 4T
Vak
PHARMACOLOGY FOR PRIMARY PROVIDER 4T

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
10 juni 2025
Aantal pagina's
273
Geschreven in
2024/2025
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

$17.99
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
Edunursepro Chamberlain College Of Nursng
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
144
Lid sinds
1 jaar
Aantal volgers
6
Documenten
9186
Laatst verkocht
2 dagen geleden
STUDY HUB

Welcome to our study hub where clear summaries and exam-focused notes help you pass faster. Welcome! Here you\'ll find well-organized study materials designed to save time and improve understanding. Welcome to simple, reliable notes that help you prepare confidently for exams.

4.0

42 beoordelingen

5
24
4
5
3
5
2
3
1
5

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen