1|Pag e
BORDER PATROL PRACTICE EXAM/ BORDER
PATROL ACTUAL EXAM RECENT AND
COMPLETE UPDATE ALL QUESTIONS AND
CORRECT ANSWERS| VERIFIED EDITION GRADED
A+| BRAND NEW!!!
Some 480,000 immigrants were living in a certain country in 1999. Although most
of these immigrants were not employed in professional occupations, many of them
were. For instance, many of them were engineers and many of them were nurses.
Very few of these immigrants were librarians, another professional occupation.
From the information given above, it can validly concluded that, in 1999, in the
country described above:
A) Most immigrants were either engineers or nurses
B) It is not the case that some of the nurses were immigrants
C) None of the engineers were immigrants
D) Some of the engineers were immigrants - ANSWER: D) Some of the engineers
were immigrants
A trucking company can act as a 'common carrier' - for hire to the general public at
published rates. As a common carrier, the trucking company is liable for any cargo
damage, unless the company can show that it was not negligent. If the company
can demonstrate that it was not negligent, then it is not liable for cargo damage. In
contrast, a 'contract carrier' ( a trucking company hired by a shipper under a
specific contract) is only responsible for cargo damage spelled out in the contract.
A Claus Inc. tractor-trailer, acting under common carrier authority, was in a 5-
,2|Pag e
vehivle accident that damaged its cargo. A Nichlos Inc. tractor-trailer, acting under
contract carrier authority, was involved in the same accident, and its cargo was also
damaged.
From the information given above, it can be validly concluded that, in reference to
the accident:
A) If Claus Inc. is liable, then it can show that it was not negligent - ANSWER: C)
If Claus Inc. can show that it was not negligent, then it is not liable
A rapidly changing technical environment in government is promoting greater
reliance on electronic mail (e-mail) systems. As this usage grows, there are
increasing chances of conflict between the users' expectations of privacy and
public access rights. In some investigation, access to ALL e-mail, including those
messages stored in archival files and messages outside the scope of the
investigation, has been sought and granted. In spite of this, some people send
messages through e-mail that would never be said face-to-face or written formally.
From the information given above, it CANNOT be validly concluded that:
A) Some e-mails messages that have been requested as part of investigations have
contained messages that would neve be said face-to-face
B) Some messages that people would never say face-to-face are sent in e-mail
messages
C) Some e-mail messages have been requested as part of investigations
,3|Pag e
D) E-mail m - ANSWER: A) Some e-mails messages that have been requested as
part of investigations have contained messages that would neve be said face-to-
face
Often, crimes are characterized as either "malum in se"-inherently evil-or "malum
prohibitum"-criminal because they are declared as offenses by a legislature.
Murder is an example of the former. Failing to file a tax return illustrates the later.
Some jurisdictions no longer distinguish between crimes "malum in se" and
"malum prohibitum", although many still do.
From the information given above, it can be validly concluded that:
A) Many jurisdictions no longer distinguish between crimes "malum in se" and
"malum prohibitum"
B) Some jurisdictions still distinguish between crimes "malum in se" and "malum
prohibitum"
C) Some crimes characterized as "malum in se" are not inherently evil
D) Some crimes characterized as "malum prohibitum" are not declared by a
legislature to be an offense
E) Sometimes failing to file a tax return is characterized as 'malum in se' -
ANSWER: B) Some jurisdictions still distinguish between crimes "malum in se"
and "malum prohibitum"
Phyllis T. is a former Federal employee who was entitled to benefits under the
Federal Employee
, 4|Pag e
Compensation Act because of a job-related, disabling injury. When an eligible
Federal employee has such an injury, the benefit is determined by this test: If the
beneficiary is married or has dependents, benefits are 3/4 of the person's salary at
the time of the injury; otherwise, benefits are set at 2/3 of the salary. Phyllis T.'s
benefits were 2/3 of her salary when she was injured.
From the information given above, it can be validly concluded that, when Phyllis
T. was injured, she:
A) Was married but without dependents
B) Was not married and had no dependents
C) Was not married but had dependents
D) Was married and had dependents - ANSWER: B) Was not married and had no
dependents
Despite the fact that HIV is not easily transmitted, its deadly potential requires that
law enforcement officers protect themselves from becoming infected by it. At the
Callen Precinct, officers use only disposable items for collection evidence
whenever blood is present, While investigating a particular crime scene where
blood was present, Detective R.C. of the Callen Precinct used only disposable
items for collecting evidence.
From the information given above, it can be validly concluded that, when
collecting evidence at a crime scene:
A) Detective R.C. does not always use disposable items when blood is present
BORDER PATROL PRACTICE EXAM/ BORDER
PATROL ACTUAL EXAM RECENT AND
COMPLETE UPDATE ALL QUESTIONS AND
CORRECT ANSWERS| VERIFIED EDITION GRADED
A+| BRAND NEW!!!
Some 480,000 immigrants were living in a certain country in 1999. Although most
of these immigrants were not employed in professional occupations, many of them
were. For instance, many of them were engineers and many of them were nurses.
Very few of these immigrants were librarians, another professional occupation.
From the information given above, it can validly concluded that, in 1999, in the
country described above:
A) Most immigrants were either engineers or nurses
B) It is not the case that some of the nurses were immigrants
C) None of the engineers were immigrants
D) Some of the engineers were immigrants - ANSWER: D) Some of the engineers
were immigrants
A trucking company can act as a 'common carrier' - for hire to the general public at
published rates. As a common carrier, the trucking company is liable for any cargo
damage, unless the company can show that it was not negligent. If the company
can demonstrate that it was not negligent, then it is not liable for cargo damage. In
contrast, a 'contract carrier' ( a trucking company hired by a shipper under a
specific contract) is only responsible for cargo damage spelled out in the contract.
A Claus Inc. tractor-trailer, acting under common carrier authority, was in a 5-
,2|Pag e
vehivle accident that damaged its cargo. A Nichlos Inc. tractor-trailer, acting under
contract carrier authority, was involved in the same accident, and its cargo was also
damaged.
From the information given above, it can be validly concluded that, in reference to
the accident:
A) If Claus Inc. is liable, then it can show that it was not negligent - ANSWER: C)
If Claus Inc. can show that it was not negligent, then it is not liable
A rapidly changing technical environment in government is promoting greater
reliance on electronic mail (e-mail) systems. As this usage grows, there are
increasing chances of conflict between the users' expectations of privacy and
public access rights. In some investigation, access to ALL e-mail, including those
messages stored in archival files and messages outside the scope of the
investigation, has been sought and granted. In spite of this, some people send
messages through e-mail that would never be said face-to-face or written formally.
From the information given above, it CANNOT be validly concluded that:
A) Some e-mails messages that have been requested as part of investigations have
contained messages that would neve be said face-to-face
B) Some messages that people would never say face-to-face are sent in e-mail
messages
C) Some e-mail messages have been requested as part of investigations
,3|Pag e
D) E-mail m - ANSWER: A) Some e-mails messages that have been requested as
part of investigations have contained messages that would neve be said face-to-
face
Often, crimes are characterized as either "malum in se"-inherently evil-or "malum
prohibitum"-criminal because they are declared as offenses by a legislature.
Murder is an example of the former. Failing to file a tax return illustrates the later.
Some jurisdictions no longer distinguish between crimes "malum in se" and
"malum prohibitum", although many still do.
From the information given above, it can be validly concluded that:
A) Many jurisdictions no longer distinguish between crimes "malum in se" and
"malum prohibitum"
B) Some jurisdictions still distinguish between crimes "malum in se" and "malum
prohibitum"
C) Some crimes characterized as "malum in se" are not inherently evil
D) Some crimes characterized as "malum prohibitum" are not declared by a
legislature to be an offense
E) Sometimes failing to file a tax return is characterized as 'malum in se' -
ANSWER: B) Some jurisdictions still distinguish between crimes "malum in se"
and "malum prohibitum"
Phyllis T. is a former Federal employee who was entitled to benefits under the
Federal Employee
, 4|Pag e
Compensation Act because of a job-related, disabling injury. When an eligible
Federal employee has such an injury, the benefit is determined by this test: If the
beneficiary is married or has dependents, benefits are 3/4 of the person's salary at
the time of the injury; otherwise, benefits are set at 2/3 of the salary. Phyllis T.'s
benefits were 2/3 of her salary when she was injured.
From the information given above, it can be validly concluded that, when Phyllis
T. was injured, she:
A) Was married but without dependents
B) Was not married and had no dependents
C) Was not married but had dependents
D) Was married and had dependents - ANSWER: B) Was not married and had no
dependents
Despite the fact that HIV is not easily transmitted, its deadly potential requires that
law enforcement officers protect themselves from becoming infected by it. At the
Callen Precinct, officers use only disposable items for collection evidence
whenever blood is present, While investigating a particular crime scene where
blood was present, Detective R.C. of the Callen Precinct used only disposable
items for collecting evidence.
From the information given above, it can be validly concluded that, when
collecting evidence at a crime scene:
A) Detective R.C. does not always use disposable items when blood is present
