Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

IOP3701 Exam Study Pack

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
29
Geüpload op
29-09-2020
Geschreven in
2019/2020

These are Exam questions and solutions as well as those that were found in assignments, study guides and practice questions. When you work through these together with explanations in your study guide, you will gain an excellent understanding of concepts, theories, techniques and methods which will allow you to answer exam questions. This will save you much needed time in your studies which you can allocate to other modules.

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Vak

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

IOP 3701 EXAM PACK-2017

PREPARED BY CHIPO MAREGA



MAY/JUNE 2016

1. Motivate the use of intra scorer and inters corer types of reliability as opposed to other types
of reliability (5)

Inter-scorer (rater)
Inter-scorer (rater) reliability is used to measure the degree to which different raters/observers give
consistent approximate scores/measures of the same observable fact. Examiner inconsistency is
a possible source of error variance. Inter-scorer (or inter-rater) reliability can be determined by
having all the test-takers' test procedures scored by two assessment practitioners. The correlation
coefficient between these two sets of scores reveals the inter-scorer reliability coefficient.


Advantages of inter scorer validity

➢ Imposes level of objectivity.
➢ Provides validation of evaluation results.
➢ Certify skills competency
➢ Assign the appropriate “grade”
➢ Increase confidence that people are following the guidelines in like manner.




Intra-scorer (rater)
The intra-scorer reliability coefficient refers to the consistency of ratings for a single rater. Repeated
ratings or scores by the same rater would give an indication of the degree of error variance between
such ratings for that particular rater.



Advantages of intra-scorer validity

➢ Improve single marker consistency in evaluating candidates’ performance.
➢ Eliminating external factors that can compromise marker’s evaluation.
➢ Increase the confidence in marker’s ability.
➢ Increase the marker’s competence in repeated occurrence.

, 2. Discuss the importance of item difficulty and discrimination indices in the analysis of items
during the test development process.


❖ Determining item difficulty – p value
✓ This is proportion/percentage of individuals who answer correctly
✓ Number of people who answered correctly divided by number of people who took the measure
✓ The higher correct responses the easier the item
✓ The smaller the percentages of correct responses, the more difficult
✓ No info about characteristics of item
✓ P value provides uniform measure of difficulty & is used when selecting final items for measure
❖ Determining discriminating power
✓ One of purpose of item analysis is to discover which items best measures the construct or
content domain that the measure aim to assess
✓ Good items consistently measure the same aspect that the total test is measuring. Individuals
do well in answering a good item correctly, whilst those who do poorly would answer a good
item incorrectly
✓ The discriminating power of an item can be determined by discriminating index & item total
correlation
✓ A positive D value indicates an item that discriminates btw the extreme groups and a negative
D value indicates an item with poor discriminating power




3.. Test results represent only one source of information and this information is predominantly
approximate in nature. Explain this statement (5)


Important issues

• Test results represent only one source of information in the assessment process:

- One 1 source of info in the assessment process
- Assessment measures are objective measures scientific and unbiased thus practitioner begin
2 value them above their own option/judgment
- Thus obscuring the view because they are one sided
- Thus subjectivity should be included


• Need to recognize the approximate nature of assessment results

- Results can have errors of measure during: admin, scoring and interpreting thus uncertainty
- Process has errors give uncertain results

, - Individual is influenced by social, economic, educational and cultural background thereby giving a
distorted picture.
Not just in the field of psychology, teachers, social workers, doctor etc




4. Discuss the planning involved for group assessments to minimise cheating (5)

➢ Seating arrangement –leave enough space between test takers
➢ Prepare multiple forms of the measure and distribute different forms to adjacent test takers.
➢ Use multiple answer sheets with different layouts
➢ Train assessment assistants who will be roving around during test administration.


5. The Human Resources manager in your company has been advocating for greater use of
computerised adaptive testing (CAT). She requested you to provide a written document which you
present a balanced view of the CAT as opposed to the standard testing procedures. In your
discussion, also highlight the advantages and disadvantages of CAT (10)


Advantages of computer-based testing:
• Standardisation of assessment instructions
• Eliminates bias practitioners
• There is a reduction in the amount of time needed for the assessment
• More information obtained on test-takers and instant scoring that allows for prompt feedback
• Graphic abilities measure spatial and perceptual abilities
• Useful to test-takers who have physical and neurological disabilities
• Can be individually tailored – minimizes cheating
• More control for practitioner
• Fewer practitioners and assistants are needed during the administration
• Decrease in errors that arise from inaccurate scoring
• Computerised testing increases test security as test materials cannot be removed from the test room
easily




Disadvantages of computer-based testing:
• Copyright violations when measures are made available on the internet
• Lack of security when measures are made available on the internet
• Problems of confidentiality

Geschreven voor

Instelling
Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
29 september 2020
Aantal pagina's
29
Geschreven in
2019/2020
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

$6.95
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF


Ook beschikbaar in voordeelbundel

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
ivann University of South Africa (Unisa)
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
1326
Lid sinds
7 jaar
Aantal volgers
1022
Documenten
52
Laatst verkocht
1 week geleden

3.8

233 beoordelingen

5
105
4
50
3
35
2
16
1
27

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen