Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

USP 143 Exam 2 questions n answers passed

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
29
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
10-07-2025
Written in
2024/2025

USP 143 Exam 2 questions n answers passed

Institution
USP 143
Course
USP 143

Content preview

USP 143 Exam 2 questions n answers
passed

Problems with quality - correct answer ✔✔*Over/underuse (lack of tx standards, clear evidence
base) (payment structure, CT scan = 1/250 chance of cancer)



*Bias in peer-reviewed journals (EG: hiring ghostwriters)



*Medication/medical errors, ADRs, Nosocomial infections, bias in financial conflicts of interest



*inequalities (disparities)



*negligence/gaps in training (malprac system, lack of accountable certification)



*uncoordinated care (pcp < specialists)



*systemic errors



*high costs! w bad outcomes



*waste! (complex system = multiple payers, high admin costs)/fruad



*Unbalanced ratio b/w PCP and specialsits (rural << urban areas)



*Financial conflicts of interest

,*Biomed model --> patients/docs are uneducated



*malprac system



*underfunded public programs



*Slow diffusion of new evidence into patient care



Medical/Structural Issues (w quality) (4- FMND) - correct answer ✔✔1) FINANCIAL CONFLICTS
OF INTEREST

--Study found that 40% of practicing providers owned the services to which they referred
patients

--Physicians who benefit from referral to these labs/diagnostics referred 4x more than
physicians who didn't profit



2) MEDICAL ERRORS

--IOM: 44-98k deaths/year due to medical errors (3rd leading cause of death)

--Journals aren't trustworthy --> 52 cancer studies --> couldn't reproduce 47 of them



3) NOSOCOMIAL INFECTIONS (HAIs)

--Affects 5-10% of hospitlized patients ($20 billion HC costs)



4) DRUG COSTS AND ADRS

--Cost continues to increase, no price caps

--Drugs only have to be better than placebo

, --Trials -- frequently tested in young people, too brief to show side effects, hide negative results;
also run by drug companies; OVERDOSED AM: IN 2000: 2/3 of clinical trials were done by for-
profit research companies funded via drug industries



Cultural/Implicit Bias Issues in HC System (3) (wrt quality) (DID) - correct answer ✔✔1)
DISPROPORTIONATE ACCESS OF CARE

-- People from poor/underserved areas/POC/Homeless = higher morbidity/mortality, less
access, lower quality of care, incorrect/overtx

--STUDY: 228 million wrong predictions/med errors harm 1.3 mil ppl --> 100k die/year



2) IMPLICIT BIAS (combined w burnout = bad)

--Attitudes that lead doctors/researchers to unconsciously treat ppl differently based on race,
gender, etc

--Blacks are 2x less likely to receive pain meds for same injury than whites



3) DISCRIMINATION

--Black patients are systematically undertx

--EG: "race-based" estimates of GFR (indicates kidney function)-- under the assumption that Af-
Am have more muscle mass



Good quality consists of (CH. 10) - correct answer ✔✔-access, clear evidence-based guidelines,
correct evals (no over/underuse), organized system, well staffed specialists



IMPROVING QUaLITY (CH.10) (FMPPCCT (7)) - correct answer ✔✔-FINANCIAL SEP DECISIONS
FOR CLINICAL DECISION MAKING

-MEASURING PRAC PATTERNS (via outcomes + ind cases)

-PUBLIC REPORTING OF QUALITY

-P4P

-CLINICAL PRAC GUIDELINES (via Agency for HC Research and Quality)

Written for

Institution
USP 143
Course
USP 143

Document information

Uploaded on
July 10, 2025
Number of pages
29
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

$23.99
Get access to the full document:

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF


Also available in package deal

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
7Eleven nursing
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
306
Member since
3 year
Number of followers
209
Documents
14730
Last sold
2 weeks ago
Stuvia study hub

4.0

118 reviews

5
65
4
17
3
19
2
3
1
14

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions