Law 2101 Final Exam: CASES

Law 2101 Final Exam: CASES

PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY V. BOOTS CASH CHEMISTS: In the society, the sale ...... - correct
answer ✔✔took place when the customer put the item in their basket.



PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY V. BOOTS CASH CHEMISTS: In the society, the offer is...... - correct
answer ✔✔The display of merchandise w/a price was an offer made by

Boots



PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY V. BOOTS CASH CHEMISTS: In the society, the acceptance is..... -
correct answer ✔✔the customer when they put the item in their basket



PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY V. BOOTS CASH CHEMISTS: In the society, the conculsion is.... -
correct answer ✔✔The sale was not under the supervision of a pharmacist since the pharmacist
could not refuse to accept the customers payment



PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY V. BOOTS CASH CHEMISTS: In the boots scenario, the sale..... -
correct answer ✔✔did not take place until the goods were paid for at the cash register.



PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY V. BOOTS CASH CHEMISTS: In the boots scenario, the invitation to
treat is.... - correct answer ✔✔The display of priced goods



PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY V. BOOTS CASH CHEMISTS: In the boots scenario, the offer is.... -
correct answer ✔✔made be the customer to the cashier



PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY V. BOOTS CASH CHEMISTS: In the boots scenario, the acceptance
is..... - correct answer ✔✔the cashier under the supervision of the pharmacist. Hence, the

,pharmacist could refuse to sell (not accept the offer of the customer to purchase) if there was a
problem



PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY V. BOOTS CASH CHEMISTS: The correct interrpretation is... - correct
answer ✔✔the interpretation put forward by Boots



PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY V. BOOTS CASH CHEMISTS: The incorrect interrpretation is... -
correct answer ✔✔the interpretation put forward by the Society



PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY V. BOOTS CASH CHEMISTS: The display of merchandise w/a price
(either in person, in an advertisement

or in a catalogue) is.... - correct answer ✔✔generally considered an invitation to treat rather
than an offer



CARLILL V CARBOLIC SMOKE BALL: The Defendants argument was.. - correct answer ✔✔• Too
vague

• It was a puff (Not to be taken seriously)

• No sane business person would make this "offer"

• Contract with the World

• No acceptance = not binding contract



CARLILL V CARBOLIC SMOKE BALL: Why would no sane business person make this "offer"? -
correct answer ✔✔Could lead to crushing liability, couldn't be a serious offer, no one would
make this decision in their right mind



What did the case between Carill and Carbolic Smoke Ball discuss? - correct answer ✔✔When is
an advertisement an offer capable of acceptance

, CARLILL V CARBOLIC SMOKE BALL/ BLACK LETTER LAW: A unilateral contract (promise for act)
is..... - correct answer ✔✔enforceable as a traditional

contract (promise for promise)



CARLILL V CARBOLIC SMOKE BALL/ BLACK LETTER LAW: It is legally... - correct answer
✔✔permissible to make an offer to the world



CARLILL V CARBOLIC SMOKE BALL/ BLACK LETTER LAW: It is w/in the power of the offeror
to....... - correct answer ✔✔dispense w/notification of acceptance



CARLILL V CARBOLIC SMOKE BALL/ BLACK LETTER LAW: Where the offer indicates.... - correct
answer ✔✔performance of the requested act can constitute notification of acceptance



CARLILL V CARBOLIC SMOKE BALL SUBSEQUENT HISTORY: Company - correct answer ✔✔o They
ran a new ad saying that only 3 people out of 1000s had claimed the reward.



They neglected to mention that Mrs. Carlill had only

recovered after legal action



She lived until the age of 96 &died of old age &the flu



LIVINGSTONE V EVANS: The History - correct answer ✔✔• E: I will sell my land to you for $1800



• L: Send lowest cash price. Will give $1600 cash



• E: Cannot reduce price



• L: I accept