1|Page
LSU BLAW 3201 FRY FINAL VERSION C LATEST 2025 ACTUAL EXAM
WITH COMPLETE QUESTIONS AND CORRECT DETAILED ANSWERS
(100% VERIFIED ANSWERS) |ALREADY GRADED A+| ||PROFESSOR
VERIFIED|| ||BRANDNEW!!!||
Nell gives Al $50 in return for Al's promise to defame Sara. Nell
hopes to ruin Sara's chances at a promotion. Nell finds out that Al
did not hold up his end of the agreement. Which of the following
statements is true?
a.
Nell can get the money back from Al through litigation.
b.
Nell can get the money back and force Al to do as he promised.
c.
Legally, Nell can neither get the money back nor force Al to do as
he promised.
d.
Nell can force Al to act through an appeal to the courts, but Al
gets to keep the $50. - ANSWER-c
Claudia sells her highly successful hair salon to Carl. In the sales
contract, Claudia agrees never to open a hair salon in the state.
Which of the following best describes this contract clause?
a.
Void as an illegal primary restraint
,2|Page
b.
Valid as a reasonable restraint on trade
c.
An unenforceable restraint of trade contrary to public policy
d.
Binding as fair protection - ANSWER-c
Don has an employment contract with Dunkirk Ice Cream. He
sells ice cream and novelty ice cream products. He has nine
children and doesn't make enough money, so he decides to see if
another dairy will hire him, too. "After all," he reasons, "most
stores carry four or five different brands." His employment
contract prohibits him from competing. If Don sells for another
dairy in addition to Dunkirk, will he be in trouble under his
contract?
a.
No, it is unenforceable as against public policy.
b.
Yes, it is likely to be enforceable during employment.
c.
No, the prohibition against competing is enforceable only after he
quits Dunkirk.
d.
,3|Page
A court would have to rule on the enforceability of the covenant
not to compete since courts are reluctant to enforce such
covenants during a period of employment. - ANSWER-b
William recently sold his successful business to Janice. The
contract for the sale contained an unreasonable restriction that
did not allow William to open a similar business for fifteen years.
The courts would, in this instance,
a.
reform the contract to make it reasonable and enforceable.
b.
require the parties to draft a new contract.
c.
enforce the contract as it is written.
d.
refuse to enforce the unreasonable restriction.
e.
Either (a) or (d). - ANSWER-e
Which of the following is true with regard to an exculpatory
clause?
a.
, 4|Page
An exculpatory clause excuses one party from liability for her own
tortious conduct.
b.
Where one party has a superior bargaining position that has
enabled him to impose an exculpatory clause upon the other, the
courts are inclined to nullify the provision.
c.
An exculpatory clause may be unenforceable for
unconscionability.
d.
All of the above are true. - ANSWER-d
If a restriction in an employment contract is found to be too harsh,
a court may do any of the following EXCEPT:
a.
change the terms of the contract.
b.
refuse to enforce the whole contract.
c.
refuse to enforce that part of the contract.
d.
refuse to void the restriction. - ANSWER-d
LSU BLAW 3201 FRY FINAL VERSION C LATEST 2025 ACTUAL EXAM
WITH COMPLETE QUESTIONS AND CORRECT DETAILED ANSWERS
(100% VERIFIED ANSWERS) |ALREADY GRADED A+| ||PROFESSOR
VERIFIED|| ||BRANDNEW!!!||
Nell gives Al $50 in return for Al's promise to defame Sara. Nell
hopes to ruin Sara's chances at a promotion. Nell finds out that Al
did not hold up his end of the agreement. Which of the following
statements is true?
a.
Nell can get the money back from Al through litigation.
b.
Nell can get the money back and force Al to do as he promised.
c.
Legally, Nell can neither get the money back nor force Al to do as
he promised.
d.
Nell can force Al to act through an appeal to the courts, but Al
gets to keep the $50. - ANSWER-c
Claudia sells her highly successful hair salon to Carl. In the sales
contract, Claudia agrees never to open a hair salon in the state.
Which of the following best describes this contract clause?
a.
Void as an illegal primary restraint
,2|Page
b.
Valid as a reasonable restraint on trade
c.
An unenforceable restraint of trade contrary to public policy
d.
Binding as fair protection - ANSWER-c
Don has an employment contract with Dunkirk Ice Cream. He
sells ice cream and novelty ice cream products. He has nine
children and doesn't make enough money, so he decides to see if
another dairy will hire him, too. "After all," he reasons, "most
stores carry four or five different brands." His employment
contract prohibits him from competing. If Don sells for another
dairy in addition to Dunkirk, will he be in trouble under his
contract?
a.
No, it is unenforceable as against public policy.
b.
Yes, it is likely to be enforceable during employment.
c.
No, the prohibition against competing is enforceable only after he
quits Dunkirk.
d.
,3|Page
A court would have to rule on the enforceability of the covenant
not to compete since courts are reluctant to enforce such
covenants during a period of employment. - ANSWER-b
William recently sold his successful business to Janice. The
contract for the sale contained an unreasonable restriction that
did not allow William to open a similar business for fifteen years.
The courts would, in this instance,
a.
reform the contract to make it reasonable and enforceable.
b.
require the parties to draft a new contract.
c.
enforce the contract as it is written.
d.
refuse to enforce the unreasonable restriction.
e.
Either (a) or (d). - ANSWER-e
Which of the following is true with regard to an exculpatory
clause?
a.
, 4|Page
An exculpatory clause excuses one party from liability for her own
tortious conduct.
b.
Where one party has a superior bargaining position that has
enabled him to impose an exculpatory clause upon the other, the
courts are inclined to nullify the provision.
c.
An exculpatory clause may be unenforceable for
unconscionability.
d.
All of the above are true. - ANSWER-d
If a restriction in an employment contract is found to be too harsh,
a court may do any of the following EXCEPT:
a.
change the terms of the contract.
b.
refuse to enforce the whole contract.
c.
refuse to enforce that part of the contract.
d.
refuse to void the restriction. - ANSWER-d
