decisions that not only have life-altering consequences for patients but also raise profound moral
questions. These issues include:#### 2.1 **Patient Autonomy and Informed Consent**One of the
fundamental ethical principles in healthcare is respect for patient autonomy—the right of patients to make
decisions about their own bodies and medical treatments. This principle is enshrined in the legal concept
of informed consent. Informed consent requires healthcare providers to disclose all relevant information
about the risks, benefits, and alternatives to a medical treatment or procedure, allowing patients to make
informed decisions.However, challenges arise when patients are not fully capable of making informed
decisions (e.g., due to age, mental illness, or language barriers). In such cases, ethical
SOUTHERN REGIONAL COMMITTEE
BANGALORE
Minutes of the 226th Meeting of SRC held at the
Conference Hall of NCTE, Bangalore on 09-10th June, 2012
The following members attended the Meeting:-
1. Prof. K. Dorasami - I/c Chairman
2. Dr. M.P. Vijayakumar I.A.S - Member
3. Prof. Sandeep Ponnala - Member
4. Prof. M.S. Lalithamma - Member
5. Sri. Gangadharaiah - Convenor
The following members/Representative could not attend the Meeting
Sri. Sathyam.S IAS, Chairman, Prof. M.A. Khader. Member,and the Representatives of
the Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Tamilnadu, Kerala , U.T‘s of Lakshadweep,
Pondicherry & Andaman & Nicobar Islands.
, SOUTHERN REGIONAL COMMITTEE
NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION
BANGALORE
Minutes OF 226th MEETING OF SRC-NCTE
Sl. Brief Description Remarks of SRC
No.
1. Confirmation of Minutes of 225th Confirmed
Meeting held on 26th – 27th June,
2012.
2. Action Taken Report (ATR) on the Noted
Minutes of 224th Meeting of SRC
held on .14-17th June 2012.
Consideration of Court Cases: (Volume- 01
Sl. Code Remarks
No Course
Name of the
Institution
State
3. APS05442 A.S. Teacher Training Institute, Boys Town, Pulluthu Post, Ellis Nagar,
APS05255 Madurai District – 625010, Tamilnadu
D.T.Ed A.S. Teacher Training Institute, Boys Town, Pulluthu Post, Ellis Nagar, Madurai
B.Ed District – 625010, Tamilnadu submitted an application for grant of recognition
A.S Teacher for D.T.Ed course on 02.01.2006.
Training The application was processed and recognition order was issued to the
Institute and institution on 09.01.2007 at Boys Town, Pulluthu Post, Ellis Nagar, Madurai
A.S College of District-625010, Tamilnadu with the condition to shift to own premises within 3
edu, Madurai years.
District, Meanwhile the Directorate of Teacher Education, Research and Training
Tamilnadu. Chennai-600006 forwarded a copy of inspection report of the institutions
TN conducted by Principal, District Institute of Education and Training. As per the
Reports of inspection of the institution conducted by Directorate of Teacher
Education, Research and Training Chennai, the committee in its 202nd meeting
held on 14th-15th March 2011 decided to issue show cause notices. Accordingly
notice was issued to the institution on 15.04.2011. The institution submitted its
reply on 11.05.2011 for the following:
The deficiencies are:
The institution is functioning in leased roofing with fully asbestos sheet
building. Three years period has already been lapsed.
The management of the institute has not ready to shift to its own building.
A B.Ed College is also functioning in the same building.
,The institute has no adequate teaching staff as per NCTE norms. The
management of the institute has violated the Regulations, Norms and
Standards of the NCTE
The reply of the management to the show cause notice was duly considered.
The reply of the institution is not convincing and hence unsatisfactory.
Under the above grounds, the SRC in its 205th meeting held on 18-19th May
2011, decided to withdraw the recognition for D.T.Ed. course run by A.S.
Teacher Training Institute, Madurai District Tamilnadu, with effect from 2012-
13 to enable the present batch of student to complete the course.
Accordingly, order withdrawing recognition was issued to the institution on
27.06.2011.
The institution filed WP No. 16535 of 2011 before the Hon‘ble High Court of
Madras at Chennai and the court has passed orders in judgment dt.
27.07.2011, which reads as under:
“….The matter is remitted back to the second respondent (DTERT, Chennai)
to consider the explanation submitted by the petitioner Trust seeking time to
complete the construction as well as the approval of staff granted by the
second respondent and pass necessary orders within a period of eight weeks
from the date of receipt of this order.
Further, The DTERT, Chennai vide letter dt. 10.08.2011 has stated that the
Hon’ble High Court in their order dt. 27.07.2011 made in W.P. No. 16535/2011
held that ”For the above reasons, I am of the view that the impugned order is
unsustainable and the same is set aside. The matter is remitted back to the
second respondent to consider the explanation submitted by the petitioner
Trust seeking time to complete the construction as well as the approval of staff
granted by the second respondent, and pass necessary orders within a period
of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order”. The Hon‘ble court
has set aside orders passed by the SRC-NCTE, Bangalore.
In the circumstances, the DTERT, Chennai has requested SRC to intimate the
action to be taken by them.
The SRC in its 211th meeting held on 21-23 September 2011 has taken note
of the Hon‘ble High Court at Chennai and decided to inform the institution to be
prepared for inspection under Section 17 of NCTE Act after 8 weeks from the
date of receipt of Court orders. And also, DTERT be informed accordingly, and
action be taken without waiting for confirmation of minutes.
Accordingly, inspection of the institution was scheduled on 15-20 February
2011 and the status of the institution was intimated to DTERT on 13.01.2012.
The institution vide letter dt.18.02.2012 stated that the construction of the
building could not be completed due to consistent power failure and other
labour problems. Further, the institution has also stated that the 90% of the
building construction has been completed and the remaining 10% of the
construction will be completed. Ready for occupation. But outer plastering
, work painting elevation work and portico works are only pending. Separate
toilet blocks are ready for occupation. The institution has requested to
postpone the inspection of the institution after 14th of April.
In the meantime, DTERT Chennai vide letter dt.14.03.2012 had requested
SRC, NCTE to intimate the action to be taken by the DTERT as early as
possible since the time limit granted by the Hon‘ble High Court of Madras has
already been exhausted.
Accordingly, a letter has been written to the DTERT, Chennai stating the facts
of the case on 18.04.2012.
The SRC in its 221st meeting held on 19-20th April, 2012 considered the
request of institution vide letter dt. 18.02.2012 and other relevant documents
and decided to cause inspection to examine whether the institution fulfils all the
infrastructural and instructional requirements as per the norms, under Section
17 of NCTE Act.
Accordingly, the inspection of the institution was conducted on 25.05.2012.
The VT members have conducted inspection for both B.Ed and D.T.Ed
courses.
Further, the institution vide its letter dt. 10.05.2012 has submitted DD bearing
No. dt. 08.05.2012 for Rs. 40000/- and DD bearing No. 164548 dt. 09.05.2012
for Rs. 10000/- inspection fee.
The Committee considered the VT Report, VCD of the institution and all
the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show
cause Notice under NCTE Act, for the following:
As per VT report it is not clear whether Language Learning Lab is
available or not for D.T.Ed course.
FDRs are expired for D.T.Ed course. Original FDRs of Rs. 5 lacs and
Rs. 3 lacs in joint account is required for B.Ed and D.T.Ed courses.
Building completion certificate duly approved by the competent Govt.
authority is not submitted for B.Ed and D.T.Ed courses.
Original fresh affidavit on Rs. 100/- stamp paper in prescribed format
is required for B.Ed and D.T.Ed courses.
Notarised copy of CLU, issued by the competent authority alongwith
proceedings of Revenue Department is not submitted for B.Ed and
D.T.Ed courses.
Non-Encumbrance Certificate not submitted for B.Ed and D.T.Ed
courses.
Institution is required to submit staff list duly approved by the
affiliating body for B.Ed and D.T.Ed courses.
The institution was granted recognition on 09.01.2007, hence, the
institution should have been shifted to its own premises before
08.01.2010 itself. However, the institution has not submitted any
formal proposal for the same.
Certified copy of original registered land documents is not submitted.
questions. These issues include:#### 2.1 **Patient Autonomy and Informed Consent**One of the
fundamental ethical principles in healthcare is respect for patient autonomy—the right of patients to make
decisions about their own bodies and medical treatments. This principle is enshrined in the legal concept
of informed consent. Informed consent requires healthcare providers to disclose all relevant information
about the risks, benefits, and alternatives to a medical treatment or procedure, allowing patients to make
informed decisions.However, challenges arise when patients are not fully capable of making informed
decisions (e.g., due to age, mental illness, or language barriers). In such cases, ethical
SOUTHERN REGIONAL COMMITTEE
BANGALORE
Minutes of the 226th Meeting of SRC held at the
Conference Hall of NCTE, Bangalore on 09-10th June, 2012
The following members attended the Meeting:-
1. Prof. K. Dorasami - I/c Chairman
2. Dr. M.P. Vijayakumar I.A.S - Member
3. Prof. Sandeep Ponnala - Member
4. Prof. M.S. Lalithamma - Member
5. Sri. Gangadharaiah - Convenor
The following members/Representative could not attend the Meeting
Sri. Sathyam.S IAS, Chairman, Prof. M.A. Khader. Member,and the Representatives of
the Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Tamilnadu, Kerala , U.T‘s of Lakshadweep,
Pondicherry & Andaman & Nicobar Islands.
, SOUTHERN REGIONAL COMMITTEE
NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION
BANGALORE
Minutes OF 226th MEETING OF SRC-NCTE
Sl. Brief Description Remarks of SRC
No.
1. Confirmation of Minutes of 225th Confirmed
Meeting held on 26th – 27th June,
2012.
2. Action Taken Report (ATR) on the Noted
Minutes of 224th Meeting of SRC
held on .14-17th June 2012.
Consideration of Court Cases: (Volume- 01
Sl. Code Remarks
No Course
Name of the
Institution
State
3. APS05442 A.S. Teacher Training Institute, Boys Town, Pulluthu Post, Ellis Nagar,
APS05255 Madurai District – 625010, Tamilnadu
D.T.Ed A.S. Teacher Training Institute, Boys Town, Pulluthu Post, Ellis Nagar, Madurai
B.Ed District – 625010, Tamilnadu submitted an application for grant of recognition
A.S Teacher for D.T.Ed course on 02.01.2006.
Training The application was processed and recognition order was issued to the
Institute and institution on 09.01.2007 at Boys Town, Pulluthu Post, Ellis Nagar, Madurai
A.S College of District-625010, Tamilnadu with the condition to shift to own premises within 3
edu, Madurai years.
District, Meanwhile the Directorate of Teacher Education, Research and Training
Tamilnadu. Chennai-600006 forwarded a copy of inspection report of the institutions
TN conducted by Principal, District Institute of Education and Training. As per the
Reports of inspection of the institution conducted by Directorate of Teacher
Education, Research and Training Chennai, the committee in its 202nd meeting
held on 14th-15th March 2011 decided to issue show cause notices. Accordingly
notice was issued to the institution on 15.04.2011. The institution submitted its
reply on 11.05.2011 for the following:
The deficiencies are:
The institution is functioning in leased roofing with fully asbestos sheet
building. Three years period has already been lapsed.
The management of the institute has not ready to shift to its own building.
A B.Ed College is also functioning in the same building.
,The institute has no adequate teaching staff as per NCTE norms. The
management of the institute has violated the Regulations, Norms and
Standards of the NCTE
The reply of the management to the show cause notice was duly considered.
The reply of the institution is not convincing and hence unsatisfactory.
Under the above grounds, the SRC in its 205th meeting held on 18-19th May
2011, decided to withdraw the recognition for D.T.Ed. course run by A.S.
Teacher Training Institute, Madurai District Tamilnadu, with effect from 2012-
13 to enable the present batch of student to complete the course.
Accordingly, order withdrawing recognition was issued to the institution on
27.06.2011.
The institution filed WP No. 16535 of 2011 before the Hon‘ble High Court of
Madras at Chennai and the court has passed orders in judgment dt.
27.07.2011, which reads as under:
“….The matter is remitted back to the second respondent (DTERT, Chennai)
to consider the explanation submitted by the petitioner Trust seeking time to
complete the construction as well as the approval of staff granted by the
second respondent and pass necessary orders within a period of eight weeks
from the date of receipt of this order.
Further, The DTERT, Chennai vide letter dt. 10.08.2011 has stated that the
Hon’ble High Court in their order dt. 27.07.2011 made in W.P. No. 16535/2011
held that ”For the above reasons, I am of the view that the impugned order is
unsustainable and the same is set aside. The matter is remitted back to the
second respondent to consider the explanation submitted by the petitioner
Trust seeking time to complete the construction as well as the approval of staff
granted by the second respondent, and pass necessary orders within a period
of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order”. The Hon‘ble court
has set aside orders passed by the SRC-NCTE, Bangalore.
In the circumstances, the DTERT, Chennai has requested SRC to intimate the
action to be taken by them.
The SRC in its 211th meeting held on 21-23 September 2011 has taken note
of the Hon‘ble High Court at Chennai and decided to inform the institution to be
prepared for inspection under Section 17 of NCTE Act after 8 weeks from the
date of receipt of Court orders. And also, DTERT be informed accordingly, and
action be taken without waiting for confirmation of minutes.
Accordingly, inspection of the institution was scheduled on 15-20 February
2011 and the status of the institution was intimated to DTERT on 13.01.2012.
The institution vide letter dt.18.02.2012 stated that the construction of the
building could not be completed due to consistent power failure and other
labour problems. Further, the institution has also stated that the 90% of the
building construction has been completed and the remaining 10% of the
construction will be completed. Ready for occupation. But outer plastering
, work painting elevation work and portico works are only pending. Separate
toilet blocks are ready for occupation. The institution has requested to
postpone the inspection of the institution after 14th of April.
In the meantime, DTERT Chennai vide letter dt.14.03.2012 had requested
SRC, NCTE to intimate the action to be taken by the DTERT as early as
possible since the time limit granted by the Hon‘ble High Court of Madras has
already been exhausted.
Accordingly, a letter has been written to the DTERT, Chennai stating the facts
of the case on 18.04.2012.
The SRC in its 221st meeting held on 19-20th April, 2012 considered the
request of institution vide letter dt. 18.02.2012 and other relevant documents
and decided to cause inspection to examine whether the institution fulfils all the
infrastructural and instructional requirements as per the norms, under Section
17 of NCTE Act.
Accordingly, the inspection of the institution was conducted on 25.05.2012.
The VT members have conducted inspection for both B.Ed and D.T.Ed
courses.
Further, the institution vide its letter dt. 10.05.2012 has submitted DD bearing
No. dt. 08.05.2012 for Rs. 40000/- and DD bearing No. 164548 dt. 09.05.2012
for Rs. 10000/- inspection fee.
The Committee considered the VT Report, VCD of the institution and all
the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show
cause Notice under NCTE Act, for the following:
As per VT report it is not clear whether Language Learning Lab is
available or not for D.T.Ed course.
FDRs are expired for D.T.Ed course. Original FDRs of Rs. 5 lacs and
Rs. 3 lacs in joint account is required for B.Ed and D.T.Ed courses.
Building completion certificate duly approved by the competent Govt.
authority is not submitted for B.Ed and D.T.Ed courses.
Original fresh affidavit on Rs. 100/- stamp paper in prescribed format
is required for B.Ed and D.T.Ed courses.
Notarised copy of CLU, issued by the competent authority alongwith
proceedings of Revenue Department is not submitted for B.Ed and
D.T.Ed courses.
Non-Encumbrance Certificate not submitted for B.Ed and D.T.Ed
courses.
Institution is required to submit staff list duly approved by the
affiliating body for B.Ed and D.T.Ed courses.
The institution was granted recognition on 09.01.2007, hence, the
institution should have been shifted to its own premises before
08.01.2010 itself. However, the institution has not submitted any
formal proposal for the same.
Certified copy of original registered land documents is not submitted.
