1|Page
HRER 501 FINAL EXAM (QUIZZES 5-8) | 2025-2026 LATEST UPDATED |
ACTUAL EXAM QUESTIONS WITH SOLUTIONS | 100% RATED
CORRECT | 100% VERFIED SOLTIONS | ALREADY GRADED A+
When a public employer conducts a workplace search, it must be: - (ANSWER)Only A and B
(Reasonable at inception.
Reasonable in scope)
Invasion of privacy claims for intrusion upon seclusion, public disclosure of private facts,
placement in a false light, and appropriation of name or likeness, are primarily based on: -
(ANSWER)Common law torts.
Prof. Miles opens a new sports drink company, but he knows nobody will buy "Miles Sports
Drink" because he has no athletic ability whatsoever. He comes up with a great idea. He will call
the drink "Jordan Juice" and put a picture of basketball legend Michael Jordan on every bottle
(without Jordan's permission). This is best classified as which kind of invasion of privacy: -
(ANSWER)Appropriation of name or likeness.
Do private sector employees have a right to view their personnel records? -
(ANSWER)Sometimes, depending on state law in the state in which the employer operates.
, 2|Page
Which of the following best describes the holding in Koeppel v. Speirs: - (ANSWER)A plaintiff
may establish an intrusion upon seclusion claim by showing that equipment used by a defendant
could have invaded her privacy.
An employer thinks Jane Doe is sending inappropriate email from her private gmail account
during working hours. The employer has its IT director, Mr. Robot, hack into the gmail servers to
retrieve all of the emails Jane Doe sent in the past year. That way, they can match the time
stamps on the emails to her work schedule. This most likely violates: - (ANSWER)The Stored
Communications Act.
The holding(s) in Ehling v. Monmouth-Ocean Hospital Service Corp. can best be described as: -
(ANSWER)Both (Non-public Facebook wall posts are covered by the Stored Communications
Act.
The authorized user exception applies to this case).
Setting aside the Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED) claim, the employer
(Defendant) in Dietz v. Finlay Fine Jewelry was entitled to summary judgment on which of the
following claims: - (ANSWER)Unknown? But it is NOT (None of the above)
Weingarten rights are best described as: - (ANSWER)Unionized employees have a right to have
a union representative present for interviews that are likely to result in discipline or discharge.
HRER 501 FINAL EXAM (QUIZZES 5-8) | 2025-2026 LATEST UPDATED |
ACTUAL EXAM QUESTIONS WITH SOLUTIONS | 100% RATED
CORRECT | 100% VERFIED SOLTIONS | ALREADY GRADED A+
When a public employer conducts a workplace search, it must be: - (ANSWER)Only A and B
(Reasonable at inception.
Reasonable in scope)
Invasion of privacy claims for intrusion upon seclusion, public disclosure of private facts,
placement in a false light, and appropriation of name or likeness, are primarily based on: -
(ANSWER)Common law torts.
Prof. Miles opens a new sports drink company, but he knows nobody will buy "Miles Sports
Drink" because he has no athletic ability whatsoever. He comes up with a great idea. He will call
the drink "Jordan Juice" and put a picture of basketball legend Michael Jordan on every bottle
(without Jordan's permission). This is best classified as which kind of invasion of privacy: -
(ANSWER)Appropriation of name or likeness.
Do private sector employees have a right to view their personnel records? -
(ANSWER)Sometimes, depending on state law in the state in which the employer operates.
, 2|Page
Which of the following best describes the holding in Koeppel v. Speirs: - (ANSWER)A plaintiff
may establish an intrusion upon seclusion claim by showing that equipment used by a defendant
could have invaded her privacy.
An employer thinks Jane Doe is sending inappropriate email from her private gmail account
during working hours. The employer has its IT director, Mr. Robot, hack into the gmail servers to
retrieve all of the emails Jane Doe sent in the past year. That way, they can match the time
stamps on the emails to her work schedule. This most likely violates: - (ANSWER)The Stored
Communications Act.
The holding(s) in Ehling v. Monmouth-Ocean Hospital Service Corp. can best be described as: -
(ANSWER)Both (Non-public Facebook wall posts are covered by the Stored Communications
Act.
The authorized user exception applies to this case).
Setting aside the Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED) claim, the employer
(Defendant) in Dietz v. Finlay Fine Jewelry was entitled to summary judgment on which of the
following claims: - (ANSWER)Unknown? But it is NOT (None of the above)
Weingarten rights are best described as: - (ANSWER)Unionized employees have a right to have
a union representative present for interviews that are likely to result in discipline or discharge.
