Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

i-Human Case Study – Betty Burns Part 1 V3 PC (Basic DDx), 48-Year-Old Female with Self-Detected Breast Lump – Complete SOAP Note, HPI, PE, Ranked DDx, and Work-Up – Updated 2025/2026 – Full Pack Solutions

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
24
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
07-09-2025
Geschreven in
2025/2026

This document provides a complete, ready-to-use solution for the i-Human case “Betty Burns Part 1 V3 PC – Basic DDx,” featuring a 48-year-old patient who presents with a self-detected breast lump. It includes a fully formatted SOAP note, targeted HPI, focused breast and regional lymphatic physical exam, a comprehensive differential diagnosis list with ranking and rationale, and an evidence-based initial work-up (labs and imaging) linked to diagnoses. Also included are a concise problem statement, problem list, and a step-by-step approach mapped to the case scoring rubric (history, PE, DDx list, ranking, and test ordering). A quick “required key questions” checklist is provided to maximize interview completeness and avoid common scoring pitfalls.

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Vak

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

B e t t y B u rn s Pa r t 1 V 3 P C - K ( B a s i c D D x )
48 years
5' 6"
165 pounds




Betty Burns
Chief complaint:
Self-detected breast lump

Below are the instructions for playing this DDx. case and your grading rubric: Note you will be allowed
to push the Interview Progress Button and receive feedback on your history questions 10 times.

a) % required history questions you asked (30% of grade)

b) % required physical exam performed (30% of grade)

c) differential diagnoses list (15%)

d) ranking differential diagnosis list (10%)

e) laboratory tests ordered (15%)

Notice that getting the correct final diagnosis is not part of the graded case. This is because if you do
well in each of the other parts, you WILL get the correct diagnosis. The software platform is designed
to help you become proficient in the diagnostic reasoning process (all the steps prior to the final
diagnosis), so you can apply this process in the real clinic setting. Key to minimizing medical errors is
the clinical consideration of a broad differential diagnosis list and the selection of tests to either “rule
in” or “rule out” these diagnoses.

**** HELPFUL HINTS ****

The Avatars and cases in the IHP case library are based on “real patients”. If the Avatar provides
confusing information, this is intentional as we often what we find real patients provide incongruent
information. For example, the Avatar may use the term “rash” for skin lesions that are not by medical
definition a rash---just like real patients. Avatars may refuse to answer questions, just like real
patients. Phrasing of questions IS important. Asking a “similar” question that is less specific may not
be scored correct if it does not provide the clarity of information needed to narrow the differential. All
of these small nuances in the case design were intentional and replicate the challenges you will face
with real patients in a clinical setting. My recommendation is to pretend this is a real clinical patient
encounter and select a time so you can enjoy the process and not feel pressured for time. Remember,
you are not scored on whether you get the diagnosis correct, but rather have you mastered the
process. Mastery of the process will help you avoid making diagnostic errors throughout your clinical
career.

Detailed Instructions Below:

1. Take the patient's history.

 Decide of this is a patient that can be treated as an outpatient; focused case – fewer history
questions needed versus a comprehensive case where all components of a history.

 Document the chief complaint

, Document any abnormal history or complaints on your problem list
 The Interview Progress Button can be used up to 10 times on the practice cases only to give
you feedback on how close you are to asking all the authors “required questions”.

2. Proceed to perform a PHYSICAL EXAM.

 Assess vital signs and perform the examination appropriate for the type of case identified by
the above history. Remember the comprehensive cases require a comprehensive physical.
 Document abnormal findings in your problem list.

3. Be sure to complete the problem list exercise.

 The directions will tell you how many items should be chosen. DO NOT exceed that number
or your score will be zero.

4. Write a concise problem statement.

 Start with a demographic description of your patient and the chief complaint and MSAP. Try to
keep your problem statement below 100 words. Although this will not count towards your final case
score, it will allow you to practice learning to communicate patient information in a complete and
concise fashion.

5. Finalize your differential diagnosis list.

 You may start your differential diagnosis during the history taking section, but after completing
the problem statement, reflect and finalize your differential diagnosis list. Remember, this part of the
case will be scored on how comprehensive this list is. You will not lose points for having too many,
points are lost only if you have too few. The average list contains 5 diagnoses.

6. Order Tests

 Order each test and link it to a diagnosis. Some tests are ordered to “rule in” a diagnosis while
others are ordered to “rule out” a diagnosis.

DO NOT try to scam the system by just clicking on everything. The software tracks not only what is
done, but also keeps track of the order of completion. Clicking on the first opening question and then
just going down the list of questions in the history is viewed as “scamming” the system and can result
in a score of ZERO---same principle applies to each section. The time for completion of the case, as
well as time spent in each section of the case is also recorded. This data has been shown to correlate
with case performance. Very short times have lower scores as do very long times. The former is most
likely due to lack of effort while the latter may be because the user is receiving multiple interruptions.
The low score then most likely reflects “lack of continuity” of thought. Try to set aside enough time to
complete the case in its entirety in a single sitting.

This software is aimed at trying to help assess your critical thinking and diagnostic reasoning skills
with patients similar to those you will be seeing in the clinical setting. It is extremely important for you
to take these cases seriously as they will be used to determine how appropriate your interactions are
with patients and if your clinical decision making skills are appropriate for this level in the program.

HISTORY
You asked 66 questions. 10 (15%) were key questions suggested by the expert case author. You
asked an additional 56 questions (85%).

Missing


Oops. You didn't ask all important questions suggested by the expert author for this case. You missed
asking 11 of the 21 key questions. (Note: Sometimes there is more than one way to get similar

, information from your patient. Eliciting information in more than one way when interviewing a patient
can be useful.)
Missing questions are:
Associated Sx/Sx Characteristics:

 Do you have any breast lump or discharge?

Risk Factors:
PMH:

 Any new or recent change in medications?

HPI/ROS:

 Do you have any of the following problems: fatigue, difficulty sleeping, unintentional weight
loss or gain, fevers, night sweats?
 Do you have any problems with: headaches that don’t go away with aspirin or Tylenol
(acetaminophen), double or blurred vision, difficulty with night vision, problems hearing, ear pain, sinus
problems, chronic sore throats, difficulty swallowing?
 Do you experience: chest pain, discomfort, pressure, pain/pressure/dizziness with exertion or
getting angry, palpitations, decreased exercise tolerance, blue/cold fingers and toes?
 Do you experience: shortness of breath, wheezing, difficulty catching your breath, chronic
cough, sputum production?
 Do you have problems with: nausea, vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, coffee grounds in your
vomit, dark tarry stool, bright red blood in your bowel movements, early satiety, bloating?
 Have you noticed: any bruising, bleeding gums or other sites of increased bleeding?
 Do you have any of the following: heat or cold intolerance, increased thirst, sweating, frequent
urination, change in appetite?
 Do you have any of the following: dizziness, fainting, spinning room, seizures, weakness,
numbness, tingling, tremor?
 When you urinate, have you noticed: pain, difficulty starting or stopping, dribbling,
incontinence, urgency during day or night. Any changes in frequency? Any blood in your urine?



Reminder:
Be sure to fill out appropriate portions of the Patient Record before proceeding.


PHYSICAL EXAM

Vitals Documentation:
 Pulse: You did not complete documentation for this required exam. Incorrect rate, correct
is 80. Incorrect rhythm, correct is regular. Incorrect strength, correct is normal.
 Respiration: You did not complete documentation for this required exam. Incorrect rate,
correct is 16. Incorrect rhythm, correct is regular. Incorrect effort, correct is normal.
 BP: You did not complete documentation for this required exam. Incorrect systolic, correct
is 128. Incorrect diastolic, correct is 80. Incorrect assessment, correct is normal. Incorrect pulse
pressure, correct is normal.

Exam Documentation:
 Lung Auscultation: You did not complete documentation for this required exam.
Left: not documented. Correct is normal.
Right: not documented. Correct is normal.

Geschreven voor

Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
7 september 2025
Aantal pagina's
24
Geschreven in
2025/2026
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

$15.49
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
NurseAdvocate chamberlain College of Nursing
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
497
Lid sinds
2 jaar
Aantal volgers
77
Documenten
12046
Laatst verkocht
6 dagen geleden
NURSE ADVOCATE

I have solutions for following subjects: Nursing, Business, Accounting, statistics, chemistry, Biology and all other subjects. Nursing Being my main profession line, I have essential guides that are Almost A+ graded, I am a very friendly person: If you would not agreed with my solutions I am ready for refund

4.6

239 beoordelingen

5
193
4
14
3
15
2
6
1
11

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen