What population is less likely to receive analgesic pain medication, regardless of SES?
African Americans
Who gets prescribed opioids more easily?
patients with higher SES
Who is more likely to be uninsured or underinsured?
Impoverished individuals, minorities
2011 IOM Report's goal
Outline a plan addressing need for cultural transformation to prevent, assess,
understand and treat pain of all types
Significant barriers to adequate pain care includes
individual and systems level
What is the leading reason to seek medical care?
Acute pain
What is the significance of pain?
Interrupts your day-to-day activities
Quite alarming
Makes you want to change your behavior
Pain=reaction to noxious elements
Early 20th century: pain
Specific pain fibers, pathways, and a pain center in the brain
1950's pain
pain is related to extent of tissue damage/injury
1960's pain
changed to research related to pain and theories: gate control theory (wall and melzack)
1990's- present pain
pain neuromatrix proposed by melzack
Intensity theory
Plato (c. 428 to 347 B.C.): pain is defined not as a unique experience, but as an
"emotion" that occurs when a stimulus is intense and lasting
,Cartesian dualistic theory
Descartes (1596-1650): pain could be the result of physical injury or psychological
injury, but the two did not influence each other
Specificity theory
Early theory that proposed that injury activates specific pain receptors and fibers that
project pain along special pain pathways to pain center (eg: heat pain goes to heat pain
pathway)
Pattern theory
Early theory that proposed pain would result from patterned input from sense organs in
the skin
Gate control theory (melzack)
The spinal cord has a “gate” mechanism that can modulate pain signals before they
reach the brain.
Small nerve fibers (A-delta, C fibers) carry pain signals → their activity tends to open
the gate → more pain gets through.
Large nerve fibers (A-beta fibers) carry non-painful input like touch, pressure,
vibration → their activity tends to close the gate → less pain gets through.
The brain can also influence the gate → descending signals can either open it
(increasing pain, e.g., stress, fear) or close it (decreasing pain, e.g., distraction,
relaxation).
Club analogy for gate theory.
Think of the spinal cord gate like the bouncer at a nightclub.
Pain signals (small fibers: A-delta & C fibers) are like rowdy people trying to push into
the club.
If lots of them show up → the bouncer lets them in → the gate opens → you feel more
pain.
Touch/pressure signals (large fibers: A-beta fibers) are like calm VIPs who help keep
order.
When they show up, the bouncer listens to them → the gate closes → fewer rowdy
people get in → pain decreases.
The brain is like the club manager calling the bouncer.
If the manager says “let them in” (stress, anxiety, focus on pain) → the gate opens
more.
If the manager says “keep them out” (distraction, relaxation, positive mood) → the gate
closes more.
The big takeaway: pain isn’t just about how many “rowdy guests” (pain signals) show up
— it’s about how the bouncer (spinal gate) and the manager (brain) decide who gets
through.
What could the gate control theory not account for?
Phantom limb pain, chronic pain, pain variability between similar pain presentations
, Melzack and Pain Neuromatrix
The most notable theory of pain:
Neuromatrix = a large, widespread network of neurons that consists of loops between
the thalamus and cortex as well as between the cortex and limbic system
How many components of the neuromatrix theory
4
Body-self neuromatrix
Cyclical
The Brain
Activation of an action neuromatrix
Body-self neuromatrix component of the neuromatrix
neural network in the brain containing somatosensory, limbic, and thalamocortical
components; integrates multiple sources of input resulting in the cognitive, affective, and
sensory perceptions of pain
Cyclical component of the neuromatrix
processing and synthesis of stimuli which produces a neurosignature
The brain component of the neuromatrix
sentient neural hub: converts neurosignatures into awareness
Activation of action neuromatrix provides:
awareness of the output
overt action pattrn of morements to achieve desired goals
achieve homeostasis in face of stress
Analogy for Neuromatrix:
Neuromatrix = the whole nightclub operation (the staff, the crowd, the manager, and
the vibe of the place).
Four Components:
Cyclical processing and synthesis → “Club Atmosphere”
The club constantly takes in cues (music, lighting, crowd behavior) and creates
a unique vibe (neurosignature) each night.
Similarly, the brain constantly processes sensory, emotional, and cognitive inputs and
produces a neurosignature (your personal “pain fingerprint”).
The brain converts neurosignatures into awareness → “Club Experience”
Guests don’t just hear music separately or see lights separately — they experience
the whole atmosphere of the club.
Likewise, the brain integrates the neurosignature and turns it into a conscious
experience of pain (or not pain).
Action neuromatrix → “What the club does”The club responds to its vibe in 3 ways:
Awareness of output → The club knows if the vibe is good or bad (brain recognizes
pain is present).