Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

PSYCHOTHERAPY MIDTERM EXAM (ACTUAL EXAM 2026) | ALL QUESTIONS AND CORRECT ANSWERS | VERIFIED ANSWERS | BRAND NEW VERSION, ALREADY GRADED A+,100% CORRECT

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
38
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
19-09-2025
Geschreven in
2025/2026

Prepare for the Psychotherapy Midterm Exam 2026 with this complete practice guide featuring 100 exam-style questions, verified answers, and detailed rationales. Designed for psychology and counseling students, this study pack covers psychodynamic therapy, CBT, DBT, ACT, IPT, family therapy, multicultural issues, ethics, neuroscience, and more. Each question includes a correct answer and explanation to strengthen your understanding and test-taking confidence. Whether you need a quick review or a full exam simulation, this resource provides a reliable way to master core psychotherapy concepts. Boost your exam performance with this trusted psychotherapy study guide.

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Vak

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

PSYCHOTHERAPY MIDTERM EXAM (ACTUAL EXAM 2026) | ALL

QUESTIONS AND CORRECT ANSWERS | VERIFIED ANSWERS | BRAND

NEW VERSION, ALREADY GRADED A+,100% CORRECT




Q1 — CBT: Cognitive Distortion Identification (MCQ)

A 28-year-old client says: “I bombed that one presentation — I’m hopeless at my job and
I’ll never be good enough.” Which cognitive distortion best fits this statement?

A. Personalization
B. Overgeneralization
C. Catastrophizing
D. Mind reading

Answer: B. Overgeneralization

Rationale:

 Why B: Overgeneralization occurs when a single event is taken as evidence of a
global, unchanging trait (e.g., “I failed once → I’m hopeless at my job, always”).
The client moves from one performance to a sweeping negative self-judgment.

 Why not A (Personalization): Personalization is attributing external events to
oneself (e.g., “They didn’t laugh because of me”), not generalizing from one
event to all.

 Why not C (Catastrophizing): Catastrophizing expects the worst possible
outcomes (e.g., “I’ll be fired, homeless”); the client’s statement is broad negative
self-labeling rather than forecasting disaster.

 Why not D (Mind reading): Mind reading assumes knowing others’ thoughts (e.g.,
“They think I’m incompetent”), which isn’t in this statement.

Clinical application: In CBT, therapist would help the client test the evidence, generate
balanced alternatives (e.g., “one poor presentation ≠ overall competence”), and use
behavioral experiments (prepare and rehearse, then review outcomes).

,Q2 — CBT Case Application (Short answer / applied)

A client reports persistent social anxiety. You plan a CBT intervention. Provide a brief
session plan (3 concrete steps) and justify each step.

Model answer (concise):

1. Psychoeducation & formulation (15 min): Explain CBT model for social
anxiety—linking anxious thoughts, bodily symptoms, avoidance, and safety
behaviors.

2. Behavioral experiment / graded exposure (20–25 min): Design a hierarchy of
social tasks (e.g., small talk → short group conversation → presenting) and do in-
session rehearsal or plan homework exposures.

3. Cognitive restructuring & homework (10–15 min): Identify automatic thoughts
(e.g., “I’ll appear stupid”), test evidence, generate alternative appraisals; assign
exposure + cognitive thought logs.

Rationale:

 Psychoeducation promotes collaborative formulation and reduces shame.

 Graded behavioral experiments target avoidance (the maintaining factor), produce
corrective experiences, and generate new evidence to update beliefs.

 Cognitive restructuring helps modify maladaptive beliefs that fuel anxiety;
homework integrates learning into daily life.



Q3 — Psychodynamic: Transference Interpretation (MCQ)

A client consistently reacts angrily whenever the therapist asks about their relationship
with their father. A psychodynamic therapist most likely conceptualizes this as:

A. Countertransference
B. Projection
C. Transference
D. Working alliance strengthening

Answer: C. Transference

Rationale:

,  Transference refers to the client projecting feelings, expectations, or patterns from
earlier relationships (often caregivers) onto the therapist. If anger toward topics
about the father emerges in relation to the therapist, this suggests the past
relational pattern is being re-experienced in the therapeutic relationship.

 Countertransference (A) would be the therapist’s emotional reaction to the client,
not the client’s.

 Projection (B) is a defense mechanism where the client attributes their feelings to
others; while related, the best psychodynamic description of the phenomenon in
therapy is transference.

 Working alliance strengthening (D) is not an explanation of the angry reaction.

Clinical note: The therapist would explore the transference carefully, linking present
feelings to past experiences and using insight to change repeating patterns.



Q4 — Humanistic Therapy: Core Conditions (Short answer)

List Carl Rogers’ three core therapist conditions and briefly explain how each supports
client change.

Model answer:

1. Unconditional Positive Regard — nonjudgmental acceptance of the client
fosters safety and self-exploration.

2. Empathic Understanding — deep, accurate empathy helps clients feel heard and
understood, enabling integration of experiences.

3. Congruence (Authenticity) — therapist genuineness models honest relating and
helps the client be authentic.

Rationale: These conditions create an environment where clients can reduce
incongruence between self-perception and experience, leading to self-actualization and
growth. Research links therapist empathy and alliance with outcome across therapies.



Q5 — Family Systems: Genogram & Identified Patient (MCQ)

In family systems theory, the family member who expresses the family’s underlying
dysfunction (often the focus of treatment) is called the:

, A. Identified patient
B. Family scapegoat
C. Systemic mediator
D. Triangulator

Answer: A. Identified patient

Rationale:

 Identified patient (sometimes called the “symptom-bearer”) is the family member
labeled as the problem, often diverting attention from systemic problems.

 Family scapegoat is similar, but the accepted clinical term for treatment focus is
identified patient.

 Systemic mediator / Triangulator are not standard family systems terms for this
role.

Clinical implication: Treatment targets family interaction patterns (boundaries, roles,
alliances) rather than just the identified patient.



Q6 — Motivational Interviewing (MI): Skill Application (MCQ)

Which response best reflects the MI spirit when a client expresses ambivalence about
quitting smoking?

A. “You should quit—think about your health.”
B. “Why are you so resistant to change?”
C. “On the one hand you enjoy smoking; on the other, you’re worried about your health.
Tell me more about both.”
D. “If you don’t quit now, you’ll regret it later.”

Answer: C.

Rationale:

 MI emphasizes expressing empathy, rolling with resistance, supporting self-
efficacy, and eliciting change talk. Option C reflects reflective listening and
exploration of ambivalence, inviting the client to voice both sides.

 Options A and D are directive/argumentative (confrontation), which often
increase resistance.

 B is blaming and likely escalates defensiveness.

Geschreven voor

Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
19 september 2025
Aantal pagina's
38
Geschreven in
2025/2026
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

$9.99
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
HealthStudyPro Johns Hopkins School Of Public Health
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
190
Lid sinds
1 jaar
Aantal volgers
16
Documenten
1411
Laatst verkocht
3 dagen geleden
HealthStudyPro

Welcome to HealthStudyPro – Your 24/7 Partner for Nursing & Healthcare Exam Success! At HealthStudyPro, we provide premium, A+ rated study materials to help nursing and healthcare students excel in their exams. Whether you're preparing for the HESI RN Exit Exam, ATI, NCLEX, or other critical assessments, we’ve got you covered with accurate, up-to-date, and verified resources.

4.3

58 beoordelingen

5
35
4
11
3
9
2
1
1
2

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen