lOMoARcPSD|59658805
Juris essay T5 - Question: Is there a general moral obligation
to obey the law which extends
Jurisprudence (University of Oxford)
Scan to open on Studocu
Studocu is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university
Downloaded by olinder seth ()
, lOMoARcPSD|59658805
Is there a general moral obligation to obey the law which extends to all
persons and all laws in a given jurisdiction?
Introduction
The question of a general moral obligation to obey the law has been a central theme in
jurisprudence, shaping the discourse on legal authority and legitimacy. Several legal
theorists have presented divergent perspectives on this topic, yielding a rich discussion
about the scope and limitations of morally grounded, general obligations to obey the
law in each jurisdiction. On the surface, the notion that citizens have a moral duty to
follow the law seems intuitive and essential for maintaining social order and stability.
Laws, after all, are typically created through democratic processes to promote the
common good and protect individual rights therefore, disobeying the law could be
seen as a violation of one's responsibilities as a member of society. However, deeper
examination of the assertion that an absolute moral obligation to obey all laws
becomes problematic as history is replete with examples of unjust, oppressive, and
even evil laws that were legally valid in their jurisdictions from the Nuremberg Laws
in Nazi Germany to the apartheid regime in South Africa which supports the notion
that there exists a moral imperative to disobey the law to avoid grave injustice.
While acknowledging the importance of law in creating a stable and just society, this
essay will argue that an absolute moral duty to obey all laws in all circumstances is
untenable. Instead, the moral obligation to follow the law is prima facie - it holds
weight but can be overridden by competing moral considerations in certain situations
thus granting citizens a defeasible moral reason to obey the law which can be
outweighed when laws are significantly unjust or when disobedience is necessary to
prevent greater harms.
Natural Law theory and moral obligation
Natural law theorists posit that law derives its authority from divine and moral
principles that are universal and immutable thus suggesting perhaps a general moral
obligation to obey extending to all persons in a given jurisdiction, but not all laws
since there exists a moral obligation to obey the law as it is not only a social construct
but a reflection of a higher moral order. For example, Finnis believes that only the law
can resolve co-ordination problems of communities such as to set the framework
conditions within which we can pursue basic good for ourselves meaning that it is our
Downloaded by olinder seth ()
Juris essay T5 - Question: Is there a general moral obligation
to obey the law which extends
Jurisprudence (University of Oxford)
Scan to open on Studocu
Studocu is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university
Downloaded by olinder seth ()
, lOMoARcPSD|59658805
Is there a general moral obligation to obey the law which extends to all
persons and all laws in a given jurisdiction?
Introduction
The question of a general moral obligation to obey the law has been a central theme in
jurisprudence, shaping the discourse on legal authority and legitimacy. Several legal
theorists have presented divergent perspectives on this topic, yielding a rich discussion
about the scope and limitations of morally grounded, general obligations to obey the
law in each jurisdiction. On the surface, the notion that citizens have a moral duty to
follow the law seems intuitive and essential for maintaining social order and stability.
Laws, after all, are typically created through democratic processes to promote the
common good and protect individual rights therefore, disobeying the law could be
seen as a violation of one's responsibilities as a member of society. However, deeper
examination of the assertion that an absolute moral obligation to obey all laws
becomes problematic as history is replete with examples of unjust, oppressive, and
even evil laws that were legally valid in their jurisdictions from the Nuremberg Laws
in Nazi Germany to the apartheid regime in South Africa which supports the notion
that there exists a moral imperative to disobey the law to avoid grave injustice.
While acknowledging the importance of law in creating a stable and just society, this
essay will argue that an absolute moral duty to obey all laws in all circumstances is
untenable. Instead, the moral obligation to follow the law is prima facie - it holds
weight but can be overridden by competing moral considerations in certain situations
thus granting citizens a defeasible moral reason to obey the law which can be
outweighed when laws are significantly unjust or when disobedience is necessary to
prevent greater harms.
Natural Law theory and moral obligation
Natural law theorists posit that law derives its authority from divine and moral
principles that are universal and immutable thus suggesting perhaps a general moral
obligation to obey extending to all persons in a given jurisdiction, but not all laws
since there exists a moral obligation to obey the law as it is not only a social construct
but a reflection of a higher moral order. For example, Finnis believes that only the law
can resolve co-ordination problems of communities such as to set the framework
conditions within which we can pursue basic good for ourselves meaning that it is our
Downloaded by olinder seth ()
