CBP Entrance Exam Study Guide
Study online at https://quizlet.com/_aqjag0
1. Some 480,000 immigrants were living in a certain D) Some of the engineers
country in 1999. Although most of these immigrants were immigrants
were not employed in professional occupations, many
of them were. For instance, many of them were en-
gineers and many of them were nurses. Very few of
these immigrants were librarians, another profession-
al occupation.
From the information given above, it can validly con-
cluded that, in 1999, in the country described above:
A) Most immigrants were either engineers or nurses
B) It is not the case that some of the nurses were
immigrants
C) None of the engineers were immigrants
D) Some of the engineers were immigrants
2. A trucking company can act as a 'common carrier' - C) If Claus Inc. can show
for hire to the general public at published rates. As a that it was not negligent,
common carrier, the trucking company is liable for any then it is not liable
cargo damage, unless the company can show that it
was not negligent. If the company can demonstrate
that it was not negligent, then it is not liable for cargo
damage. In contrast, a 'contract carrier' ( a trucking
company hired by a shipper under a specific contract)
is only responsible for cargo damage spelled out in
the contract. A Claus Inc. tractor-trailer, acting under
common carrier authority, was in a 5-vehivle accident
that damaged its cargo. A Nichlos Inc. tractor-trailer,
, CBP Entrance Exam Study Guide
Study online at https://quizlet.com/_aqjag0
acting under contract carrier authority, was involved in
the same accident, and its cargo was also damaged.
From the information given above, it can be validly
concluded that, in reference to the accident:
A) If Claus Inc. is liable, then it can show that it was not
negligent
B) If Claus Inc. cannot show that it was not negligent,
then it is not liable
C) If Claus Inc. can show that it was not negligent, then
it is not liable
D) If Nichols Inc. is liable, then it cannot show that it is
negligent
3. A rapidly changing technical environment in govern- A) Some e-mails messages
ment is promoting greater reliance on electronic mail that have been request-
(e-mail) systems. As this usage grows, there are in- ed as part of investigations
creasing chances of conflict between the users' expec- have contained messages
tations of privacy and public access rights. In some in- that would neve be said
vestigation, access to ALL e-mail, including those mes- face-to-face
sages stored in archival files and messages outside
the scope of the investigation, has been sought and
granted. In spite of this, some people send messages
through e-mail that would never be said face-to-face
or written formally.
From the information given above, it CANNOT be valid-
ly concluded that:
, CBP Entrance Exam Study Guide
Study online at https://quizlet.com/_aqjag0
A) Some e-mails messages that have been requested
as part of investigations have contained messages that
would neve be said face-to-face
B) Some messages that people would never say
face-to-face are sent in e-mail messages
C) Some e-mail messages have been requested as part
of investigations
D) E-mail messages have not been exempted from
investigations
4. Often, crimes are characterized as either "malum in B) Some jurisdictions
se"-inherently evil-or "malum prohibitum"-criminal be- still distinguish between
cause they are declared as offenses by a legislature. crimes "malum in se" and
Murder is an example of the former. Failing to file a "malum prohibitum"
tax return illustrates the later. Some jurisdictions no
longer distinguish between crimes "malum in se" and
"malum prohibitum", although many still do.
From the information given above, it can be validly
concluded that:
A) Many jurisdictions no longer distinguish between
crimes "malum in se" and "malum prohibitum"
B) Some jurisdictions still distinguish between crimes
"malum in se" and "malum prohibitum"
C) Some crimes characterized as "malum in se" are not
inherently evil
Study online at https://quizlet.com/_aqjag0
1. Some 480,000 immigrants were living in a certain D) Some of the engineers
country in 1999. Although most of these immigrants were immigrants
were not employed in professional occupations, many
of them were. For instance, many of them were en-
gineers and many of them were nurses. Very few of
these immigrants were librarians, another profession-
al occupation.
From the information given above, it can validly con-
cluded that, in 1999, in the country described above:
A) Most immigrants were either engineers or nurses
B) It is not the case that some of the nurses were
immigrants
C) None of the engineers were immigrants
D) Some of the engineers were immigrants
2. A trucking company can act as a 'common carrier' - C) If Claus Inc. can show
for hire to the general public at published rates. As a that it was not negligent,
common carrier, the trucking company is liable for any then it is not liable
cargo damage, unless the company can show that it
was not negligent. If the company can demonstrate
that it was not negligent, then it is not liable for cargo
damage. In contrast, a 'contract carrier' ( a trucking
company hired by a shipper under a specific contract)
is only responsible for cargo damage spelled out in
the contract. A Claus Inc. tractor-trailer, acting under
common carrier authority, was in a 5-vehivle accident
that damaged its cargo. A Nichlos Inc. tractor-trailer,
, CBP Entrance Exam Study Guide
Study online at https://quizlet.com/_aqjag0
acting under contract carrier authority, was involved in
the same accident, and its cargo was also damaged.
From the information given above, it can be validly
concluded that, in reference to the accident:
A) If Claus Inc. is liable, then it can show that it was not
negligent
B) If Claus Inc. cannot show that it was not negligent,
then it is not liable
C) If Claus Inc. can show that it was not negligent, then
it is not liable
D) If Nichols Inc. is liable, then it cannot show that it is
negligent
3. A rapidly changing technical environment in govern- A) Some e-mails messages
ment is promoting greater reliance on electronic mail that have been request-
(e-mail) systems. As this usage grows, there are in- ed as part of investigations
creasing chances of conflict between the users' expec- have contained messages
tations of privacy and public access rights. In some in- that would neve be said
vestigation, access to ALL e-mail, including those mes- face-to-face
sages stored in archival files and messages outside
the scope of the investigation, has been sought and
granted. In spite of this, some people send messages
through e-mail that would never be said face-to-face
or written formally.
From the information given above, it CANNOT be valid-
ly concluded that:
, CBP Entrance Exam Study Guide
Study online at https://quizlet.com/_aqjag0
A) Some e-mails messages that have been requested
as part of investigations have contained messages that
would neve be said face-to-face
B) Some messages that people would never say
face-to-face are sent in e-mail messages
C) Some e-mail messages have been requested as part
of investigations
D) E-mail messages have not been exempted from
investigations
4. Often, crimes are characterized as either "malum in B) Some jurisdictions
se"-inherently evil-or "malum prohibitum"-criminal be- still distinguish between
cause they are declared as offenses by a legislature. crimes "malum in se" and
Murder is an example of the former. Failing to file a "malum prohibitum"
tax return illustrates the later. Some jurisdictions no
longer distinguish between crimes "malum in se" and
"malum prohibitum", although many still do.
From the information given above, it can be validly
concluded that:
A) Many jurisdictions no longer distinguish between
crimes "malum in se" and "malum prohibitum"
B) Some jurisdictions still distinguish between crimes
"malum in se" and "malum prohibitum"
C) Some crimes characterized as "malum in se" are not
inherently evil
