l201 Exam 3 cases Test Questions And Correct Answers.

Clark's Sales and Service, Inc. V. Smith p465 - Answer Noncomepte agreement overly broad clause and thus unenforceable not split up so court could enforce reasonable provisions Favor of Smtih Banks v Lockart p204 - Answer Battery punitive damages bc sudden act of passion favor of Lockart Durham v Mcdonalds p207 - Answer Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress Extreme and outrageous, and severe Favor of Durham Farrell v Macy's p210 - Answer False Imprisonment Macy's protected because probable cause In favor of Macy's Neumann v Liles p212 - Answer Defamation, pure opinion vs mixed opinion/fact Because of hyperbolic language and clear opinion tone In favor of Liles Bertrand v Mullin p218 - Answer Public Figure No actual malice though there is negligence In favor of Mullin Jordan v Jewel Food p228 - Answer Commercial Appropriation of Name and Likeness Jewel's ad qualified as commercial speech In favor of Jordan Kesner v Superior Court p247 - Answer Duty of Reasonable Care abestos