1|Page
LSU BLAW 3201 FRY Final Version B Newest 2026
Complete 100 Questions And 100%Correct Answers
(Verified Answers) ||Already Graded A+|Brand New!!!
Performance that is incomplete but that does not defeat
the purpose of the contract; does not discharge the injured
party but entitles him to damages. - ANSWER-substantial
performance
When the assignee gives consideration, the assignor may
not revoke the assignment without the assignee's consent.
- ANSWER-revocability of assignment
Transfer of a portion of contractual rights to one or more
assignees. - ANSWER-partial assignment
,2|Page
Most contract rights are assignable, except? - ANSWER-1.
Assignments that materially increase the duty, risk, or
burden upon the obligor.
2. Assignments of personal rights.
3. Assignments expressly forbidden by the contract.
4. Assignments prohibited by law.
Rights That Are Not Assignable: Personal Rights: In Re
Magness: Why did the trustee in bankruptcy want to
assign the golf memeberships? - ANSWER-The trustee
sought to assign the golf memberships to recover value for
the bankruptcy estate by selling them to members on the
waiting list, other members, or the general public.
,3|Page
Rights That Are Not Assignable: Personal Rights: What did
the bankruptcy court decide regarding the assignment of
the golf memberships? - ANSWER-The bankruptcy court
found that the club's rules functioned as anti-assignment
provisions and ruled that the trustee could not assign the
memberships.
Rights That Are Not Assignable: Personal Rights: How did
the district court view the nature of the contract between
the club and its golfing members? - ANSWER-The district
court saw the contract as a personal, non-commercial
agreement, not a lease, involving social and recreational
relationships.
, 4|Page
Rights That Are Not Assignable: Personal Rights: What is
the significance of the waiting list in the court's decision? -
ANSWER-The waiting list represented individuals with
contractual expectations and financial investments based
on a defined selection process, which would be
undermined by allowing the trustee to assign
memberships.
Rights That Are Not Assignable: Personal Rights: Why did
the court refer to the contract as a "personal contract"? -
ANSWER-Because the membership involved personal
relationships and activities (like golfing and socializing),
under Ohio law, such contracts are not assignable without
consent due to the importance of the individuals involved.
LSU BLAW 3201 FRY Final Version B Newest 2026
Complete 100 Questions And 100%Correct Answers
(Verified Answers) ||Already Graded A+|Brand New!!!
Performance that is incomplete but that does not defeat
the purpose of the contract; does not discharge the injured
party but entitles him to damages. - ANSWER-substantial
performance
When the assignee gives consideration, the assignor may
not revoke the assignment without the assignee's consent.
- ANSWER-revocability of assignment
Transfer of a portion of contractual rights to one or more
assignees. - ANSWER-partial assignment
,2|Page
Most contract rights are assignable, except? - ANSWER-1.
Assignments that materially increase the duty, risk, or
burden upon the obligor.
2. Assignments of personal rights.
3. Assignments expressly forbidden by the contract.
4. Assignments prohibited by law.
Rights That Are Not Assignable: Personal Rights: In Re
Magness: Why did the trustee in bankruptcy want to
assign the golf memeberships? - ANSWER-The trustee
sought to assign the golf memberships to recover value for
the bankruptcy estate by selling them to members on the
waiting list, other members, or the general public.
,3|Page
Rights That Are Not Assignable: Personal Rights: What did
the bankruptcy court decide regarding the assignment of
the golf memberships? - ANSWER-The bankruptcy court
found that the club's rules functioned as anti-assignment
provisions and ruled that the trustee could not assign the
memberships.
Rights That Are Not Assignable: Personal Rights: How did
the district court view the nature of the contract between
the club and its golfing members? - ANSWER-The district
court saw the contract as a personal, non-commercial
agreement, not a lease, involving social and recreational
relationships.
, 4|Page
Rights That Are Not Assignable: Personal Rights: What is
the significance of the waiting list in the court's decision? -
ANSWER-The waiting list represented individuals with
contractual expectations and financial investments based
on a defined selection process, which would be
undermined by allowing the trustee to assign
memberships.
Rights That Are Not Assignable: Personal Rights: Why did
the court refer to the contract as a "personal contract"? -
ANSWER-Because the membership involved personal
relationships and activities (like golfing and socializing),
under Ohio law, such contracts are not assignable without
consent due to the importance of the individuals involved.
