1. What is the central argument of Karl Popper's The Poverty of Historicism? - Answers
Historicism is not viewed kindly; any attempt to predict the future is flawed.
1. According to Popper, why is historicism flawed as a methodology? - Answers It
misunderstands social sciences; can't be fixed.
1. What role does Popper believe the scientific method plays in the study of society? - Answers
Focus on prediction rather than falsifiability.
What does Popper mean by the term "piecemeal social engineering"? - Answers Gradual and
incremental changes by trial and error.
1. How does Popper suggest we should approach social change? - Answers By making small
incremental changes.
1. What is the main argument of Haidt and Lukianoff in "Why It's a Bad Idea to Tell Students
Words Are Violence"? - Answers A counter to another article that argues that controversial
speakers should be banned from campus.
1. According to Haidt and Lukianoff, what is one negative consequence of teaching students
that words are a form of violence? - Answers It makes students more anxious and less resilient
by reinforcing cognitive distortions, such as catastrophizing and emotional reasoning.
1. What psychological concept do the authors use to explain why avoiding difficult ideas can be
harmful? - Answers Individuals grow stronger by facing adversity; avoiding difficult ideas
deprives students of the opportunity to develop resilience.
1. What do Haidt and Lukianoff say about the relationship between speech and physical
violence? - Answers Implications of the word violence and that free speech is a cure for violence.
1. What impact do the authors argue speech restrictions have on academic environments? -
Answers They harm academic environments by limiting open debate, discouraging intellectual
diversity, and fostering a culture of fear.
1. How do Haidt and Lukianoff connect their argument to cognitive distortions? - Answers
Viewing words as violence reinforces cognitive distortions like catastrophizing and emotional
reasoning.
1. What do the authors propose as a healthier alternative to viewing words as violence? -
Answers Authors advocate for aligned 1st amendment; offensive speech is words rather than
violence.
1. According to Haidt and Lukianoff, what happens when people are shielded from offensive
speech? - Answers Makes people more fragile, less capable of handling adversity, and increases