Onequestion 4 6paragraphs orroughly 450600wordslong
how
about
Think these agreeordisagree inwhat
readings therelationships
they about say
between ideasof
the syntaxsemantics andfollowingarule
Studysheet
1 SyntaxvsSemantics
syntaxformalstructurehow
symbols
toeachother
relate
semantics meaninghow relate
symbols
towhatthey inthe
represent world
CentralDebatecan alone
syntax semantics
generate
saysNO
Searle Room
Chinese Argument
Hangeland YESinprinciple
says ifproperlygroundedinphysicalsystems
as than
u nderstandingrather
Bridgesreinterpretsmeaning p ragmatic meresymbolmanipulation
2 SearleTheRediscoveryoftheMind
c Computationalists
fight
gampermade
of
anything
Room
Chinese A rgument
beinterpretedasimplementing0sandi's
asitcan
aslong
Searle
i maginesaperson
followingEnglish to
i nstructions manipulateChinese
symbols
multiple
realizability rulefollowing
syntactic withoutunderstandingc hinese
universal
Claimsymbol
manipulation understanding
2 Multiplerealizability realizability
are
Programs are
syntacticminds semantic
iÉt impendenting
any computation
Mental
but
Conclusion computerss imulateunderstanding
i ntentionalitywhich
have
states
haveit
don't
lacks
syntax
3 syntaxisnot tophysics
intrinsic Implications strong AIisfalse alone
computation cannot yieldunderstanding orconsciousn
syntaxisan propertynot
relative
observer aphysicalproperty
no
1
states
computational
are the
notdiscoveredin p hysics
Theyare to
assigned the
physics
Whether
something isacomputerisnotascientificphysicalfact
Itisan by
made observers
decision
interpretive
4 computationalismcannotbeanaturalscience
Ifcomputationisobserver then
relative
Asystemisacomputer onlyifsomeone toit
assignsasyntax
Butnatural scienceseeksw hatis tothe
intrinsic world
c annot
computationalism beanaturalempiricalscienceofcognition
5 AttemptedEscape HomunculusFallacy
meat
i i.tiiiin i
amputation
in i
IiiSoInt at
still
haveapurely description
syntactic the
bottom
they you
youstillhaven'tmade intrinsic
computation
still an
require external
to the
interpreter read syntax
Homunculus collapses
argument
6 Searle'sFinalPoint
facts
i ntrinsic the
brain
I iii fit L Eta it.inatiatiaidinteretationanmant
ihÉÉ
É É litherical
headigitalcomputer
isadigitalcomputerthen is
rest
ntaisnot formalmanipulation it'sgroundedinphysicalsystemsthat
x just
toimplement
are
If everything nothing designed interpretations
thesyntaxsemanticsgapmay
Therefore
besmallerthansearle
thinks
A chess
Conclusion
rules
syntax
computer's m ean because
something ofitsroleinalargerpractice
The
mind
c omputer stillholdifweunderstandhow
can
analogy s emantics from
emerges cont
systemic
how
about
Think these agreeordisagree inwhat
readings therelationships
they about say
between ideasof
the syntaxsemantics andfollowingarule
Studysheet
1 SyntaxvsSemantics
syntaxformalstructurehow
symbols
toeachother
relate
semantics meaninghow relate
symbols
towhatthey inthe
represent world
CentralDebatecan alone
syntax semantics
generate
saysNO
Searle Room
Chinese Argument
Hangeland YESinprinciple
says ifproperlygroundedinphysicalsystems
as than
u nderstandingrather
Bridgesreinterpretsmeaning p ragmatic meresymbolmanipulation
2 SearleTheRediscoveryoftheMind
c Computationalists
fight
gampermade
of
anything
Room
Chinese A rgument
beinterpretedasimplementing0sandi's
asitcan
aslong
Searle
i maginesaperson
followingEnglish to
i nstructions manipulateChinese
symbols
multiple
realizability rulefollowing
syntactic withoutunderstandingc hinese
universal
Claimsymbol
manipulation understanding
2 Multiplerealizability realizability
are
Programs are
syntacticminds semantic
iÉt impendenting
any computation
Mental
but
Conclusion computerss imulateunderstanding
i ntentionalitywhich
have
states
haveit
don't
lacks
syntax
3 syntaxisnot tophysics
intrinsic Implications strong AIisfalse alone
computation cannot yieldunderstanding orconsciousn
syntaxisan propertynot
relative
observer aphysicalproperty
no
1
states
computational
are the
notdiscoveredin p hysics
Theyare to
assigned the
physics
Whether
something isacomputerisnotascientificphysicalfact
Itisan by
made observers
decision
interpretive
4 computationalismcannotbeanaturalscience
Ifcomputationisobserver then
relative
Asystemisacomputer onlyifsomeone toit
assignsasyntax
Butnatural scienceseeksw hatis tothe
intrinsic world
c annot
computationalism beanaturalempiricalscienceofcognition
5 AttemptedEscape HomunculusFallacy
meat
i i.tiiiin i
amputation
in i
IiiSoInt at
still
haveapurely description
syntactic the
bottom
they you
youstillhaven'tmade intrinsic
computation
still an
require external
to the
interpreter read syntax
Homunculus collapses
argument
6 Searle'sFinalPoint
facts
i ntrinsic the
brain
I iii fit L Eta it.inatiatiaidinteretationanmant
ihÉÉ
É É litherical
headigitalcomputer
isadigitalcomputerthen is
rest
ntaisnot formalmanipulation it'sgroundedinphysicalsystemsthat
x just
toimplement
are
If everything nothing designed interpretations
thesyntaxsemanticsgapmay
Therefore
besmallerthansearle
thinks
A chess
Conclusion
rules
syntax
computer's m ean because
something ofitsroleinalargerpractice
The
mind
c omputer stillholdifweunderstandhow
can
analogy s emantics from
emerges cont
systemic
