1
The return of martin Questions and
Answers (100% Correct Answers)
Already Graded A+
What does Finlay accuse Davis of regarding
Bertrande's role?— Ans: He accuses her of
inventing aspects of Bertrande's role and lacking
support from historical evidence.
© 2025 Assignment
Guru01 - Stuvia
How does Finlay characterize Bertrande's
involvement in the case?— Ans: He sees her as a
Expert
passive victim of Arnaud du Tilh's deception
rather than an accomplice.
What is the 'Hawkeye Propositions'?— Ans: An
alternative theory suggesting widespread
awareness or collusion in Arnaud's imposture
among villagers.
What advantages did Martin's relatives and
friends gain from the imposture?— Ans: They
may have gained economic and legal advantages,
such as replacing Pierre's guardianship.
What led to the collapse of the arrangement
involving Arnaud?— Ans: Arnaud pressed for
property profits during Martin's absence, leading
to conflict with Pierre.
, 2
How does Davis evaluate the Hawkeye
Propositions compared to Finlay's theory?— Ans:
She finds the Hawkeye Propositions more
convincing, especially regarding legal and
strategic advantages.
What critique does Davis offer regarding the
evidence of collusion?— Ans: She points out the
lack of trial evidence showing accusations of
© 2025 Assignment
collusion among village witnesses.
Guru01 - Stuvia
What does Davis suggest about the nature of
Expert
complicity in the case?— Ans: She suggests
varying levels of 'knowing' complicity rather
than a completely orchestrated scheme.
What important values does Davis argue are
overlooked by the Hawkeye focus?— Ans: Values
like honor, legitimate succession, regional
customs, harmonious households, and religious
concerns.
What complexities does the Martin Guerre case
illustrate?— Ans: It illustrates complexities in
personal identity, social dynamics, and legal
systems of 16th-century rural France.
How do family and community interests
influence the acceptance of imposture?— Ans:
The return of martin Questions and
Answers (100% Correct Answers)
Already Graded A+
What does Finlay accuse Davis of regarding
Bertrande's role?— Ans: He accuses her of
inventing aspects of Bertrande's role and lacking
support from historical evidence.
© 2025 Assignment
Guru01 - Stuvia
How does Finlay characterize Bertrande's
involvement in the case?— Ans: He sees her as a
Expert
passive victim of Arnaud du Tilh's deception
rather than an accomplice.
What is the 'Hawkeye Propositions'?— Ans: An
alternative theory suggesting widespread
awareness or collusion in Arnaud's imposture
among villagers.
What advantages did Martin's relatives and
friends gain from the imposture?— Ans: They
may have gained economic and legal advantages,
such as replacing Pierre's guardianship.
What led to the collapse of the arrangement
involving Arnaud?— Ans: Arnaud pressed for
property profits during Martin's absence, leading
to conflict with Pierre.
, 2
How does Davis evaluate the Hawkeye
Propositions compared to Finlay's theory?— Ans:
She finds the Hawkeye Propositions more
convincing, especially regarding legal and
strategic advantages.
What critique does Davis offer regarding the
evidence of collusion?— Ans: She points out the
lack of trial evidence showing accusations of
© 2025 Assignment
collusion among village witnesses.
Guru01 - Stuvia
What does Davis suggest about the nature of
Expert
complicity in the case?— Ans: She suggests
varying levels of 'knowing' complicity rather
than a completely orchestrated scheme.
What important values does Davis argue are
overlooked by the Hawkeye focus?— Ans: Values
like honor, legitimate succession, regional
customs, harmonious households, and religious
concerns.
What complexities does the Martin Guerre case
illustrate?— Ans: It illustrates complexities in
personal identity, social dynamics, and legal
systems of 16th-century rural France.
How do family and community interests
influence the acceptance of imposture?— Ans:
